LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

CFTC v DEWEY WILES Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: CVDW91362, CourtName: MISC 2, Plaintiff: CFTC, State: TX Texas, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>CVDW91362, Trading, Wiles, Act, Futures, Commodity, Investors, Funds, Customers, Profits, Contract, Fec, Exchange Company, Texas, Northern District, Trades, Trading System, Equitable Relief, Civil Penalties, Misrepresentations, Commission, Transaction, Commodity Trading Advisor, Capacity Requiring Registration, Written Statements, Commission Regulation, Paragraphs, Unregistered Commodity Trading, Interstate Commerce, Solicitation , ContentID: 120252667

Case Documents
1 1998-04 COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 127725
15 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 15 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . COMPLAINT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
WILES
ACT
FUTURES
COMMODITY
INVESTORS
FUNDS
CUSTOMERS
PROFITS
CONTRACT
FEC
DEFENDANTS
EXCHANGE COMPANY
TEXAS
NORTHERN DISTRICT
TRADES
TRADING SYSTEM
EQUITABLE RELIEF
CIVIL PENALTIES
MISREPRESENTATIONS
COMMISSION
TRANSACTION
COMMODITY TRADING ADVISOR
CAPACITY REQUIRING REGISTRATION
WRITTEN STATEMENTS
COMMISSION REGULATION
PARAGRAPHS
UNREGISTERED COMMODITY TRADING
INTERSTATE COMMERCE
SOLICITATION
                               UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                           FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS


                                                 )
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING                        )          Civil Action No. 3-02CV 0951G
COMMISSION,                                      )
                                                 )
Plaintiff,                                       )
                                                 )
v.                                               )
                                                 )
DEWEY V. WILES                                   )
and                                              )
FUTURES EXCHANGE COMPANY,                        )
INC.,                                            )
                                                 )
Defendants.                                      )
                                                 )
                                                 )


       COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND OTHER EQUITABLE RELIEF AND FOR
                 CIVIL PENALTIES UNDER THE COMMODITY EXCHANGE ACT


                                         I.  SUMMARY

          1.      From approximately April 1998 through October 2001, Dewey V. Wiles ("Wiles"),

through his company, Futures Exchange Company, Inc. ("FEC"), solicited and accepted more than

$773,000 from approximately 80 persons who invested funds for the purpose of trading commodity

futures contracts.  Wiles solicited prospective investors by falsely claiming to be a successful

commodity futures trader who had a trading system that could predict trades with 90-95% accuracy.

Wiles implied that trading futures was safe, and claimed that he could help investors --

senior citizens-- make substantial commodity futures trading profits.  Wiles, however, traded only a

portion of the customers' funds, and lost money as a result of that trading.  Nevertheless, Wiles

investors numerous written statements falsely reporting that the trading was profitable.  Such

misrepresentations served both to solicit new money and to keep existing investors from


SNIPPETS:
  • FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
  • CIVIL PENALTIES UNDER THE COMMODITY EXCHANGE ACT
  • through his company, Futures Exchange Company, Inc., solicited and accepted more than
  • Wiles solicited prospective investors by falsely claiming to be a successful
  • commodity futures trader who had a trading system that could predict trades with 90-95%
  • Wiles implied that trading futures was safe, and claimed that he could help investors --
  • portion of the customers' funds, and lost money as a result of that trading.
  • investors numerous written statements falsely reporting that the trading was profitable.
  • In collecting the investor funds, Defendants purported to offer joint ventures
  • FEC acted as an unregistered Commodity
  • Commission brings this action to enjoin such acts and practices, and to compel compliance
  • and such other equitable relief as the Court may deem necessary and appropriate.
  • Wiles, who is nearly 80 years, owns Defendant Futures Exchange Company.
  • A commodity trading advisor is defined in Section 1aof the Act,
  • value of or the advisability of trading in: any contract of sale of a commodity for future
  • transaction execution facility; any commodity option authorized under section 4c; or any
  • An associated person is defined in Commission Regulation 1.3,
  • in any capacity that involves: the solicitation of a client's or prospective client's
  • False Guarantees of Profits
  • Acting as an Unregistered Commodity Trading Advisor and Unregistered Associated Person
  • Wiles was associated with FEC in a capacity requiring registration as an associated
  • FRAUD BY MISAPPROPRIATION, MISREPRESENTATIONS
  • Paragraphs 1 through 29 are realleged and incorporated herein.
  • instrumentalities of interstate commerce, Defendants violated Section 4b-of the Act, 7
  •    |