LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

CFTC v CHARLES MADY et al Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: CVCMEA116015, CourtName: MISC 2, Plaintiff: CFTC, State: MI Michigan, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>CVCMEA116015, Funds, Commodity, Customer, Act, Account, Commodity Futures, Commission, Trading, Commodity Options, Commodity Pool, Mady, Receiver, Relevant Time, False Account Statements, Relief, Pool Participant, Assets, Commission Regulation, Nlv, Misappropriating, Possession, Eastern District, Accounts, Llc, Commodity Pool Operator, Control, Complaint, Connection, Order Requiring Defendant, Lind-waldock, Paragraphs, Directs, Investment Trust, Monthly Distributions, Power, Receivership Estate, Authority , ContentID: 120252665

Case Documents
1   ORDER
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 127722
1 pages
PDF
2 2002-06-11 AGREED ORDER APPOINTING RECEIVER
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 131126
10 pages
PDF
3 1999-10 COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 127721
19 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 3 documents , 30 pages
Price: $ 29.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . ORDER

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
No key words
found in document.
--------------
This indicates that
document is an image.
--------------
Images in PDF files
often contain text
readable by persons
but not by scanners.













SNIPPETS:

2 . AGREED ORDER APPOINTING RECEIVER

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DEFENDANTS
ASSETS
FUNDS
COURT
POSSESSION
ACCOUNTS
CONTROL
COMPLAINT
COMMISSION
COMMODITY POOL
DIRECTS
POWER
MADY
RECEIVERSHIP ESTATE
BUSINESS
AUTHORITY
PREMISES
INVESTORS
RELIEF
COMPENSATION
PAYMENTS
CUSTODY
COMMODITY POOL PARTICIPANTS
PARTIES
ENTRY
ALLEGES
ENFORCING
DUTIES
PERSONNEL
                         IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                        FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Commodity Futures Trading Commission,                 Civil Action No.: 02-73294
  Plaintiff,
vs.

Charles G. Mady,                                      Judge Arthur J. Tarnow
  Defendant,                                          Magistrate Judge Pepe
and

Mady Funding Company LLC,                             Agreed Order Appointing
Mady Futures, Inc.,                                   Receiver
  Relief
                        Defendants.




        WHEREAS,  on June 11, 2002, Plaintiff, Commodity Futures Trading Commission

("Commission"), filed a complaint against Defendant Charles G. Mady ("Mady") and Relief

Defendants Mady Funding Company, LLC and Mady Futures, Inc., ("collectively Defendants"),

seeking injunctive and other equitable relief and civil monetary penalties for Defendant's

violations of the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended ("Act"), 7 U.S.C. §§ 1 et seq (2001),

and Commission Regulations, 17 C.F.R. §§ 1 et seq (2001).  The Commission alleges that

Defendant misappropriated investor funds, issued false reports and statements, operated as a

commodity pool operator ("CPO") without benefit of registration, committed fraud while acting

as a CPO, and commingled pool funds with his own funds.  The Commission further alleges that

the Relief Defendants may have received funds or otherwise benefited from funds that are

directly traceable to the Defendant's alleged fraudulent schemes and that the Relief Defendants

have no legitimate interest in those funds.

        WHEREAS,  simultaneously with the filing of the Complaint, the Commission and

Mady, on his own behalf and as agent for the Relief Defendants agreed to the entry of a Consent



SNIPPETS:
  • WHEREAS, on June 11, 2002, Plaintiff, Commodity Futures Trading Commission
  • filed a complaint against Defendant Charles G. Mady
  • and Relief
  • Defendants Mady Funding Company, LLC and Mady Futures, Inc.,,
  • commodity pool operator without benefit of registration,
  • and commingled pool funds with his own funds.
  • The Commission further alleges that
  • on his own behalf and as agent for the Relief Defendants agreed to the entry of a Consent
  • Order of Preliminary Injunction and Other Ancillary Relief by this Court.
  • Defendants' assets and directs the Defendants to provide the Court with an accurate
  • This Order is issued upon agreement of the parties.
  • Young of Young and Susser, P.C., is appointed as temporary equity Receiver, with
  • for all funds, properties, premises, accounts and other assets of, in the possession of,
  • funds belonging to investors and commodity pool participants as described in the
  • Take exclusive custody, control, and possession of all the funds, property, mail
  • shall have full power to sue for, collect, receive and take possession of all goods,
  • Take all steps necessary to secure the business premises of the Defendants,
  • except that no powers or authority granted in this Order
  • or necessary in the performance of duties and responsibilities under the authority
  • designated accounts and shall make all payments and disbursements from the
  • receivership estate from such accounts, except that the power to make payments
  • Accelerating the due date of any obligation or claimed obligation, enforcing any
  • Receiver's Report to the Court and Compensation
  • IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Receiver and all personnel hired by the Receiver

  • 3 . COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    COMMODITY
    FUNDS
    CUSTOMER
    ACT
    ACCOUNT
    COMMODITY FUTURES
    TRADING
    COMMISSION
    COMMODITY OPTIONS
    MADY
    COMMODITY POOL
    RELEVANT TIME
    FALSE ACCOUNT STATEMENTS
    RELIEF
    POOL PARTICIPANT
    COMMISSION REGULATION
    NLV
    MISAPPROPRIATING
    EASTERN DISTRICT
    LLC
    COMMODITY POOL OPERATOR
    CONNECTION
    ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANT
    LIND-WALDOCK
    PARAGRAPHS
    INVESTMENT TRUST
    MONTHLY DISTRIBUTIONS
    OPTIONS TRANSACTIONS
    COMMODITY EXCHANGE ACT
    
                               In The United States District Court
                              For The Eastern District Of Michigan
    
    Commodity Futures Trading Commission,  Civil Action No: 02-72364
      Plaintiff,
    vs.
    
    Charles G. Mady,
                   Defendant,
    and                                                    Complaint For Injunctive And
                                                           Other Equitable Relief And
    Mady Funding Company LLC,                              Civil Monetary Penalties Under
    Mady Futures, Inc.,                                    The Commodity Exchange Act
      Relief
                           Defendants.
    
    
    
                                              I.  Summary
    
            1.     From at least October 1999 to the present ("relevant time period"), Charles G.
    
    Mady ("Defendant") has solicited and accepted customer funds for use in trading in commodity
    
    futures and commodity options.  He has misappropriated some of those funds and has issued
    
    false account statements that misrepresented the profitability of his trading.  He also has acted as
    
    a commodity pool operator ("CPO") without the benefit of registration and has defrauded at least
    
    one commodity pool participant.  Finally, Defendant has commingled funds of the pool with his
    
    own funds and the funds of at least one other person.
    
            2.     Specifically, Defendant has engaged, is engaging, or is about to engage in acts or
    
    practices which violate the anti-fraud sections of the Commodity Exchange Act ("Act"),
    
    7 U.S.C. §§ 1 et seq. (2001), and Commission Regulations thereunder, 17 C.F.R. §§ 1 et seq.
    
    (2002).  Defendant has violated Sections 4c(b) and 4o(1) of the Act, 7 U.S.C. § 6c(b), and
    
    Commission Regulation 33.10, 17 C.F.R. § 33.10, by misappropriating customer funds and by
    
    
    
    making false reports and statements to at least one customer in connection with commodity
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • For The Eastern District Of Michigan
  • Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Civil Action No:
  • From at least October 1999 to the present ("relevant time period"),
  • Mady has solicited and accepted customer funds for use in trading in commodity
  • false account statements that misrepresented the profitability of his trading.
  • a commodity pool operator without the benefit of registration and has defrauded at least
  • Defendant has commingled funds of the pool with his
  • practices which violate the anti-fraud sections of the Commodity Exchange Act,
  • making false reports and statements to at least one customer in connection with commodity
  • options transactions and by defrauding at least one commodity pool participant.
  • Finally, Defendant has violated Commission Regulation 4.20, 17 C.F.R
  • and such other equitable relief as the Court may deem necessary or appropriate under the
  • Defendant Charles G. Mady is 31 years old and resides in Northville,
  • Relief Defendant Mady Funding Company, LLC is a Michigan
  • § 4.10, as any investment trust, syndicate or similar form of enterprise engaged in the
  • business of investing its pooled funds in trading commodity futures and/or commodity options.
  • A "commodity pool operator" is defined in Section 1aof the Act,
  • As described in paragraphs 19 to 40 below,
  • activity in Defendant's futures account at Lind-Waldock.
  • The letters "NLV" appeared on the upper right side of the page, just to the right of the
  • In June and July 2001, Defendant submitted two more false account statements,
  • At the end of each quarter, after Customer's monthly distributions had been made, Defendant
  • Violations of the Commodity Exchange Act
  • deceive Customer by misappropriating Customer's funds entrusted to Defendant for trading
  • E. Enter an order requiring Defendant and the Relief Defendants to disgorge to any
  •    |