LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

BRIAN BARRY et al v EDISON SCHOOLS INC ET AL Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: BBEAVESIEA208455, CourtName: MISC 2, Plaintiff: BRIAN BARRY et al, State: NY New York, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>BBEAVESIEA208455, Edison, Schools, Securities, Class Action, York, Fraud, Pricewaterhousecoopers Llp, Adam Feild, Exchange Act, Common Stock, Bloomberg, Bloomberg Report, Revenue, Misleading, Material Facts, Market Price, School Districts, Financial Statements, Reported Revenues, Glancy, Plaintiff Brian Barry, Christopher, Paragraph, Personal Knowledge, Federal Securities Laws, Accounting , ContentID: 120252658

Case Documents
1   COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 127712
14 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 14 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . COMPLAINT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DEFENDANTS
PLAINTIFF
SCHOOLS
SECURITIES
CLASS ACTION
MEMBERS
YORK
FRAUD
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
ATTORNEYS
ADAM FEILD
EXCHANGE ACT
COMMON STOCK
BLOOMBERG
BLOOMBERG REPORT
REVENUE
MISLEADING
MATERIAL FACTS
MARKET PRICE
SCHOOL DISTRICTS
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
REPORTED REVENUES
GLANCY
PLAINTIFF BRIAN BARRY
CHRISTOPHER
PARAGRAPH
PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE
FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS
ACCOUNTING
IRA M. PRESS (IP 5313)
KIRBY MCINERNEY & SQUIRE, LLP
830 Third Avenue, 10th Floor
New York, New York  10022
Telephone: (212) 371-6600
Facsimile:            (212) 751-2540

LIONEL Z. GLANCY
GLANCY & BINKOW LLP
1801 Avenue of the Stars Suite 311
Los Angeles, California  90067
Telephone: (310) 201-9150
Facsimile:            (310) 201-9160

Attorneys for Plaintiff Brian Barry and
The Barry Family LP

Additional Counsel listed on signature page

                                       UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                                 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK



BRIAN BARRY, On Behalf of the Barry                        Case No.
Family LP, individually, and on behalf of all
others similarly situated,                                 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR
                                                           VIOLATIONS OF THE FEDERAL
                                                           SECURITIES LAWS
            Plaintiff,

     v.                                                    JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

EDISON SCHOOLS INC.,
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP;
ADAM FEILD, and CHRISTOPHER
WHITTLE,

            Defendants.


                      Plaintiff, by plaintiff's undersigned attorneys, alleges, upon information and

belief (said information and belief being based, in part, upon the investigation conducted

                                                      1


SNIPPETS:
  • New York, New York 10022 Telephone:
  • LIONEL Z. GLANCY GLANCY & BINKOW LLP
  • Attorneys for Plaintiff Brian Barry and
  • EDISON SCHOOLS INC., PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP;
  • ADAM FEILD, and CHRISTOPHER
  • Plaintiff, by plaintiff's undersigned attorneys, alleges, upon information and
  • by and through plaintiff's attorney), except with respect to paragraph 5, which is alleged
  • upon personal knowledge, as follows:
  • This is a securities fraud class action brought on behalf of investigators
  • of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. Section 78j,
  • This Court has personal jurisdiction over defendants pursuant to Section
  • Plaintiff purchased shares of Edison common stock during the Class
  • Edison develops medium and large school districts.
  • PWC audited Edison's financial statements for fiscal1999 that were
  • Defendant Adam Feild is the Company's executive vice
  • As a result, and according to the SEC Order,"the review of accounting
  • materially false and misleading, as Edison's restatement acknowledges.
  • The Company reported approximately $376 million of revenue.
  • would learn at the end of the Class Period, approximately half of the reported revenues were
  • report by the Bloomberg News Service.
  • The Bloomberg report quoted Walter Schuetze,
  • The members of the Class are so numerous that joinder of all members
  • Whether the federal securities laws were violated by defendants' acts
  • FRAUD ON THE MARKET DOCTRINE
  • failed to disclose material facts,
  • entitled to a presumption of reliance upon the integrity of the market price for the Company's
  •    |