LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

BENEDETTO HASSAN et al v ASIAINFO HOLDINGS INC Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: BHEAVAHI223870, CourtName: MISC 2, Plaintiff: BENEDETTO HASSAN et al, State: PA Pennsylvania, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>BHEAVAHI223870, Asiainfo, Securities, Act, Commissions, Prospectus, Exchange, Underwriter Defendants, York, Offering, Stock, Shares, Price, Reports, Dissemination, Public Offering, Executives, Material Facts, Individual Defendants, Misleading, Ipo, Shareholders, Common Stock, Southern District, Regulation, Registration Statement, Class Period, Materially False, Violations , ContentID: 120252655

Case Documents
1   CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 127709
45 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 45 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
ASIAINFO
SECURITIES
PLAINTIFF
ACT
COMMISSIONS
PROSPECTUS
EXCHANGE
UNDERWRITER DEFENDANTS
YORK
OFFERING
STOCK
SHARES
PRICE
REPORTS
DISSEMINATION
PUBLIC OFFERING
EXECUTIVES
MATERIAL FACTS
INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS
MISLEADING
IPO
SHAREHOLDERS
COMMON STOCK
SOUTHERN DISTRICT
REGULATION
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
CLASS PERIOD
MATERIALLY FALSE
VIOLATIONS
MILBERG WEISS BERSHAD HYNES                AsiaInfo Holdings, Inc.
 & LERACH, LLP
One Pennsylvania Plaza
New York, New York 10119-0165
(212) 594-5300

BERNSTEIN LIEBHARD & LIFSHITZ, LLP
10 East 40th Street
New York, New York 10016
(212) 779-1414

Co-Liaison Counsel for Plaintiff on
behalf of Plaintiffs' Executive Committee
listed on signature pages


                        UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                   SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-----------------------------------X
BENEDETTO HASSAN, on behalf                : 01-CV-10901 (SAS)
of himself and all others                  :
similarly situated,                : 21 MC 92 (SAS)
                                   :
                    Plaintiff,     :
                                   : CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
            -against-                      : FOR VIOLATIONS OF
                                       : FEDERAL SECURITIES LAW
                                           :
ASIAINFO HOLDINGS, INC., MORGAN            :
STANLEY DEAN WITTER & CO., INC.,           :
DEUTSCHE BANC ALEX. BROWN INC.,            : JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
DONALDSON, LUFKIN & JENRETTE               :
SECURITIES CORPORATION, LOUIS LAU, :
JAMES DING and YING HAN,                                :
                                   :
                   Defendants.     :
-----------------------------------X


          Plaintiff, by and through by his attorneys, as

and for his Class Action Complaint, alleges upon personal

knowledge as to his own acts and as to all other matters

upon information and belief based upon, inter alia, the


investigation made by and through his attorneys, which
SNIPPETS:
  • One Pennsylvania Plaza New York,
  • Co-Liaison Counsel for Plaintiff on behalf of Plaintiffs' Executive Committee listed on
  • SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------X
  • herein as "AsiaInfo" or the "Company") with the Securities
  • and Exchange Commission or disseminated to AsiaInfo's
  • Form 10-Q's, proxy statements, Quarterly Reports to
  • Shareholders, the Prospectus and Registration Statement
  • 12 and 15 of the Securities Act of
  • including the preparation and dissemination
  • during the Class Period (including the trading of AsiaInfo
  • stock based upon misleading information).
  • other wrongs complained of herein, the defendants, directly
  • Plaintiff purchased shares of AsiaInfo as
  • AsiaInfo described itself in its IPO
  • initial public offering of 5,000,000 shares of common stock
  • of the common stock of AsiaInfo.
  • Company's initial public offering.
  • Each of the Individual Defendants was provided
  • press releases alleged herein to be materially false and/or
  • AsiaInfo and the Offering price to the public
  • excessive and undisclosed commissions from
  • customers agreed to and did pay the Underwriter Defendants
  • offering, according to the executives.
  • regarding violations of NASD rules connected with the sale
  • Due to the undisclosed material facts
  • including, inter alia, Regulation S-K.
  •    |