LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

ANDREW CICCHILLO v ARCHDIOCESE OF LOS ANGELES Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: ACVAOLA219929, CourtName: MISC 2, Plaintiff: ANDREW CICCHILLO, State: MN Minnesota, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>ACVAOLA219929, Defendant Archdiocese, Abuse, Mahony, Plaintiff Andrew Cicchillo, Defendant Priest, Plaintiff Andrew, Bishop, Sexual Abuse, Stockton, Enterprise, Paul, Minnesota, Plaintiff Joseph Cicchillo, Loss, Roman Catholic Church, Fraudulent Representations, Los Angeles, California, Emotional Distress, Sexual Misconduct, Counseling, Law Enforcement Authorities, Psychological Treatment, Earning Capacity, Controlling, Archbishop, Daily Activities, Interstate Wire Service , ContentID: 120252649

Case Documents
1   COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 127703
33 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 33 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . COMPLAINT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
PLAINTIFFS
DEFENDANT ARCHDIOCESE
ABUSE
MAHONY
PLAINTIFF ANDREW CICCHILLO
DEFENDANT PRIEST
PLAINTIFF ANDREW
BISHOP
SEXUAL ABUSE
STOCKTON
ENTERPRISE
PAUL
MINNESOTA
PLAINTIFF JOSEPH CICCHILLO
LOSS
ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH
FRAUDULENT REPRESENTATIONS
LOS ANGELES
CALIFORNIA
EMOTIONAL DISTRESS
SEXUAL MISCONDUCT
COUNSELING
LAW ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITIES
PSYCHOLOGICAL TREATMENT
EARNING CAPACITY
CONTROLLING
ARCHBISHOP
DAILY ACTIVITIES
INTERSTATE WIRE SERVICE
 1  Lawrence  E.  Drivon,  Cal. # 46660
       Drivan  &  Tabak
 2  215 N.  San Joaquin  Street
       Stockton,  CA  95202
 3  (209)  466-0982
       Fax (209)  463-7668
 4  Jeffrey  R. Anderson
 5  E- 1000 First  National  Bank Bldg.
       332 Minnesota  Street
 6  St. Paul, Minnesota  55 101
       (65 1) 227-9990
 7

 8                             SUPERIOR  COURT  OF THE  STATE  OF  CALIFORNIA
                                 LOS ANGELES  COUNTY,  CENTRAL  DISTRICT
 9

10  ANDREW  CICCHILLO,
       JOSEPH  CICCHILLO
11                                               .
                      Plaintiffs,
12  vs.
13                                                                     Case No.

14  ARCHDIOCESE  OF LOS  ANGELES,  A                                                    COMPLAINT  
       CORPORATION  SOLE.  CARDINAL  ROGER                                             RACKETEERING,
15  Mahony,  FR. CARL  SUTPHIN,  AND                                                PERSONAL 
       DOES  ONE  THROUGH  ONE HUNDRED                                       NEGLIGENCE         AND
16
                      Defendants.
17
                                                       PARTIES
18
               1.     Plaintiff  Andrew  Cicchillo  is an adult  man who  was a minor  at the time 
19  abuse, alleged  herein, occurring  between  1962 through  1970.
20
               2.     Plaintiff  Joseph Cicchillo  is an adult man who  was a minor  at the time 
21  abuse, alleged  herein, occurring  in approximately  1968.
22
               3.     Defendant  Archdiocese  of  Los Angeles,  a corporation  sole, is a non-profit
23  religious  organization  with  its principal  place of  business in Los Angeles,  California 
24  "Archdiocese").
25
               4.     Defendant  Cardinal  Roger  Mahony  (hereafter  "Mahony")  is the Cardinal  of
26  Defendant  Archdiocese  and by virtue  of his office,  Defendant  Mahony  is empowered  to, and
27  fact, represents the Defendant  Archdiocese  in this litigation.  Defendant  Mahony  is sued
28  individually  and in his capacity as Cardinal  of the Archdiocese.


SNIPPETS:
  • Plaintiff Andrew Cicchillo is an adult man who was a minor at the time of the
  • 19 abuse, alleged herein, occurring between 1962 through 1970.
  • Plaintiff Joseph Cicchillo is an adult man who was a minor at the time of the
  • Defendant Archdiocese of Los Angeles, a corporation sole, is a non-profit
  • 23 religious organization with its principal place of business in Los Angeles, California
  • Defendant Cardinal Roger Mahony is the Cardinal of
  • At all times material, Defendant Priest was under the direct supervision, employ
  • Archdiocese (hereafter the "Enterprise I") constitutes an association in fact enterprise
  • U.S.C. 5 1961 and the persons controlling or directing the affairs of Enterprise I have
  • 15 public scandal in the Roman Catholic Church.
  • 21 including law enforcement authorities,
  • 24 Guidelines, and other Considerations in Pedophilia Cases," Bishop Quinn stated:
  • confidentiality provisions that required victims of sexual abuse to preserve the Bishop's
  • Catholic priest employed by the Catholic Bishop for the Diocese of Winona in Minnesota.
  • acting in concert with the Archbishop for the Archdiocese of St Paul and Minneapolis,
  • 10 Archbishop of the Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis as a parish priest in various
  • 16 U.S. Postal Service and interstate wire service to perform the fraudulent acts described
  • 10 while he was the Bishop for the Diocese of Stockton,
  • 25 these deceitful and fraudulent representations by the Defendant Mahony,
  • 26 Enterprises I, II, and/or III fraudulently misrepresented the facts of known sexual
  • 12 directing the affairs of Enterprises I, II, and/or III, thousands of children, including
  • 16 Enterprise I, II, and/or III, Plaintiffs and many others suffered damage in the loss of
  • 22 Cicchillo with the costs of counseling.
  • 28 manifestations of emotional distress, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, disgrace,
  • psychological treatment, therapy, and counseling.
  • 28 their daily activities and obtaining the full enjoyment of life; has sustained loss of
  • earning capacity; and/or has incurred and will continue to incur expenses for medical and
  •    |