LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

ANDREA L WIRTH et al v ELECTION SYSTEMS & SOFTWARE INC Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: ALWEAVESSI264277, CourtName: MISC 2, Plaintiff: ANDREA L WIRTH et al, State: IL Illinois, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>ALWEAVESSI264277, Votomatic System, Election, Votes, Voters, Voting, Card, Common, Ballots, Injunctive Relief, Registered Voters, United States, Unfair Competition, Chad, Punch Card, Competition Common Law, Declaratory, Deceptive Acts, Card Reader, Representations, Consumer Protection, Disenfranchisement, Hanging Chad, West Melbourne, Circuit Court, Demand Judgment, Manufacturing, General Election , ContentID: 120252648

Case Documents
1   COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 127702
49 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 49 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . COMPLAINT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
ELECTION
VOTES
VOTERS
PLAINTIFFS
VOTING
CARD
DEFENDANTS
COMMON
BALLOTS
INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
REGISTERED VOTERS
UNITED STATES
ATTORNEYS
UNFAIR COMPETITION
CHAD
PUNCH CARD
COMPETITION COMMON LAW
DECLARATORY
DECEPTIVE ACTS
CARD READER
REPRESENTATIONS
CONSUMER PROTECTION
DISENFRANCHISEMENT
HANGING CHAD
WEST MELBOURNE
CIRCUIT COURT
DEMAND JUDGMENT
MANUFACTURING
GENERAL ELECTION
         IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
                               ST. CLAIR COUNTY, ILLINOIS

ANDREA L. WIRTH,                                 )
JUDY M. KENT, and                                )
LEE R. BRIGHT,                                   )
on behalf of themselves and all others           )                                        :
similarly situated,                              )
                                                 )
               Plaintiffs                        )
                                                 )
                                                 )
                                                 )              Civil Action No.  _______________
                                                 )
                                                 )              CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
                                                 )                     FOR DECLARATORY
                                                 )                AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
       vs.                                       )
                                                 )
                                                 )
                                                 )
                                                 )
ELECTION SYSTEMS &                               )
       SOFTWARE, INC.                            )
11208 John Galt Boulevard                        )
Omaha, Nebraska  68137                           )
                                                 )
  Registered Agent:   Paul C. Jessen             )
                       Suite 800                 )
                       1125 S. 103rd Street      )
                       Omaha, NE  68124          )
                                                 )
                                                 )
SEQUOIA PACIFIC SYSTEMS                          )
1030 North Anderson Road                         )
Exeter, California  93221                        )
                                                 )
 Registered Agent:     Corporation Trust Company )
                       1209 Orange Street        )
                       Bloomington, DE  19801    )
                                                 )
                                                 )


FIDLAR AND CHAMBERS                                     )
(a/k/a Fidlar Doubleday, Inc.)                          )
4450 48th Avenue Court                                  )
Rock Island, Illinois 61201                             )
                                                        )
SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
  • CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
  • Plaintiffs, by and through their attorneys, bring this Complaint, on behalf of themselves
  • This is a class action brought by registered voters nationwide in counties using the
  • counties in 28 states used the Votomatic system for the casting of non-absentee votes in
  • Approximately 29 percent of all registered voters in the United States,
  • persons, are registered in these counties, making the Votomatic the most common voting system
  • "Votomatic" means all punch card voting systems in which a
  • The Defendants are companies that have designed, marketed, advertised,
  • and consistently disenfranchising large numbers of voters in election
  • the fact that the Votomatic does not perform as intended, i.e., does not accurately count
  • promoting, manufacturing, servicing, selling, and/or distributing services or products for the
  • engage in actions that are and will result in the ongoing disenfranchisement of voters across
  • Plaintiffs were required to use the Votomatic system to cast such ballots.
  • congressional primaries for which they are eligible and the general election.
  • corporation with its principal place of business in West Melbourne,
  • card reader machines.
  • At all times pertinent to the Complaint, Melbourne serviced card reader
  • meant to remove the chad from the computer card and leave a hole when the voter pushes the
  • Hanging chad also frequently prevent the card reader machines from accurately
  •    |