LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

ALBERT FADEM TRUST v DUKE ENERGY CORP Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: AFTVDEC187208, CourtName: MISC 2, Plaintiff: ALBERT FADEM TRUST, State: NY New York, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>AFTVDEC187208, Duke, Material Facts, Class Period, Report, Common, Securities, Energy, Financial Statements, Exchange, Connection, Omissions, Common Law, Misrepresentations, Price, Common Stock, Defendant Deloitte, Federal Securities Laws, Misstatements, Misleading, Simultaneous Purchases, Exchange Act, Inter Alia, Annual Report, United States, Financial Statement Schedule, Dissemination, Consolidated Financial Statements, Accounting Principles , ContentID: 120252647

Case Documents
1   COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 127701
26 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 26 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . COMPLAINT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DUKE
PLAINTIFFS
MATERIAL FACTS
CLASS PERIOD
REPORT
COMMON
SECURITIES
ENERGY
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
EXCHANGE
CONNECTION
OMISSIONS
COMMON LAW
MISREPRESENTATIONS
PRICE
COMMON STOCK
DEFENDANT DELOITTE
FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS
MISSTATEMENTS
MISLEADING
SIMULTANEOUS PURCHASES
EXCHANGE ACT
INTER ALIA
ANNUAL REPORT
UNITED STATES
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE
DISSEMINATION
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES
                               UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                              SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
________________________________________________
THE ALBERT FADEM TRUST and LLOYD R.                              X
FADEM, as Trustee, on behalf of themselves and all               :      No.
others similarly situated,                                       :
                                                                 :      CLASS ACTION
                                       Plaintiffs,               :      COMPLAINT
                                                                 :
                       against                                   :      JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
                                                                 :
DUKE ENERGY CORP.,                                               :
RICHARD PRIORY, ROBERT BRACE,                                    :
WILLIAM COLEY, FRED FOWLER,                                      :
HARVEY PADEWER,                                                  :
and DELOITTE & TOUCHE, LLP,                                       :
                                       Defendants.               :
________________________________________________X


       Plaintiffs, by their undersigned attorneys, individually and on behalf of the Class described


below, upon information and belief, based upon, inter alia, the investigation of counsel, which


includes, among other things, a review of public announcements made by defendants, Securities and


Exchange Commission ("SEC") filings made by defendants, press releases, reports of securities


analysts, and media reports, except as to the paragraph applicable to the named plaintiffs which is


alleged upon personal knowledge, bring this complaint (the "Complaint") against defendants named


herein, and allege as follows:




                                   SUMMARY OF ALLEGATIONS


       1.    This is a securities class action alleging violations of the federal securities laws


SNIPPETS:
  • Plaintiffs, by their undersigned attorneys, individually and on behalf of the Class described
  • Exchange Commission filings made by defendants, press releases, reports of securities
  • the common law in connection with misstatements and omissions of material fact regarding Duke
  • Energy Corp. ("Duke" or the "Company") by the defendants named herein.
  • simultaneous purchases and sales of power with at the same price;
  • power at the same price.
  • Defendant Deloitte & Touche, LLP violated the common law by either
  • intentionally or negligently certifying Duke's financial statements as incorporated in Duke's
  • Report for the years 2000 and 2001.
  • low as $32.89 on May 21, 2002, down from a class period high of $47.74.
  • the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 28 U.S.C. § 1331.
  • misleading financial statements and either intentionally or negligently certified such
  • exchanged or otherwise acquired the common stock of Duke between April
  • whether the federal securities laws were violated by defendants' acts as
  • Dissemination of False and Misleading Financial Information
  • Duke's Annual Report on Form 10K for the year ending December 31,
  • These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of Duke
  • We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the
  • An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
  • Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the
  • Such Annual Report also included the consent of Deloitte to, inter alia, the incorporation of
  • MISSTATEMENTS AND OMISSIONS OF MATERIAL FACTS
  • public misrepresentations or failed to disclose material facts during the Class Period
  •    |