U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Litigation Release No. 17385 / February 27, 2002
SEC v. TRANS ENERGY, INC., LOREN E. BAGLEY, AND WILLIAM F. WOODBURN,
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, Civil Action No.
1-01-CV-02060
On February 26, 2002, the United States District Court for the
District of Columbia entered a permanent injunction against Trans
Energy, Inc. (Trans Energy), its former president, Loren E. Bagley
(Bagley), and its former vice president and principal financial
officer, William F. Woodburn (Woodburn), permanently enjoining them
from future violations of Sections 10(b) and 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) and Rules 10b-5, 12b-20, 13a-1,
and 13a-13 thereunder. The Court's order further enjoins Bagley and
Woodburn from aiding and abetting violations of Section 13(a) of the
Exchange Act and Rules 12b-20, 13a-1, and 13a-13 thereunder and orders
Bagley and Woodburn to each pay a $20,000 civil penalty. Trans Energy,
Bagley, and Woodburn consented to entry of the permanent injunction
and the imposition of civil penalties without admitting or denying the
Commission's allegations.
The Commission's Complaint alleged that from 1998 through 2000, Trans
Energy, at the direction of Bagley and Woodburn, disseminated a number
of false and misleading statements to the investing public through
press releases, wesbite postings, and Commission filings.
Specifically, Trans Energy issued press releases in October 2000
touting a supposed $612 million worth of oil reserves. The Complaint
alleged that Trans Energy had no reasonable basis to value the
potential reserves at that amount. The Complaint further alleged that
in a November 2000 posting on its website, Trans Energy inaccurately
minimized the significance of the "going concern statement" included
in its most recent filing with the Commission at a time when Trans
Energy's ability to continue as a going concern was greatly in doubt.
Additionally, the Commission claimed that in a December 2000 press
release about its Chapter 7 bankruptcy, Trans Energy misled the
investing public by failing to disclose that the bankruptcy arose from
Trans Energy's inability to pay a $600,665.36 consent judgment entered
earlier that year, and that a Chapter 7 trustee had been appointed.
Finally, the Complaint alleged that Trans Energy's Commission filings
from 1998 through 2000 misrepresented the status of, or failed to
disclose the existence of, material lawsuits that resulted in over $1
million in consent judgments against the company. The Complaint
alleged that Bagley and Woodburn, as Trans Energy's only officers,
knew or were reckless in not knowing that the above statements were
false and misleading.
_________________________________________________________________
SNIPPETS:
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SEC v. TRANS ENERGY, INC., LOREN E. BAGLEY, AND WILLIAM F. WOODBURN, U.S. District Court for
On February 26, 2002, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia entered a
The Court's order further enjoins Bagley and Woodburn from aiding and abetting violations of
Trans Energy, Bagley, and Woodburn consented to entry of the permanent injunction and the
The Commission's Complaint alleged that from 1998 through 2000, Trans Energy, at the
Trans Energy issued press releases in October 2000 touting a supposed $612 million worth of
Additionally, the Commission claimed that in a December 2000 press release about its Chapter
Finally, the Complaint alleged that Trans Energy's Commission filings from 1998 through 2000
|