LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v HAWA CORPORATION, et al Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-17412, CourtName: INJUNCTION AND OTHER RELIEF WHICH THE COURT ENTERED ON NOVEMBER 30,, Defendant: Hawa Corporation, et al., Plaintiff: SEC, State: IN Indiana, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-17412, Hawa, Mandelbaum, Securities, Complaint, Exchange Commission, Hawa Corporation, Civil, Judgement, Hawacom, Hurley, Settles, Ilona Alexis Mandelbaum, Injunction, Permanent, Act, Disgorgement, Penalty, Investors, South America, Hawa Communications, Sale, Shares, Doctors, Marketing Brochures, Internet Website, Combined Assets, Acquisitions, Telecommunications, Technology Firms, Reality , ContentID: 120252325

Case Documents
1 2002-03-14 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 127353
1 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 1 page.    CAUTION.    PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS IS A ONE PAGE CASE.
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
MANDELBAUM
SECURITIES
COMPLAINT
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
HAWA CORPORATION
CIVIL
JUDGEMENT
HAWACOM
HURLEY
SETTLES
ILONA ALEXIS MANDELBAUM
INJUNCTION
PERMANENT
ACT
DISGORGEMENT
PENALTY
INVESTORS
SOUTH AMERICA
HAWA COMMUNICATIONS
SALE
SHARES
DOCTORS
MARKETING BROCHURES
INTERNET WEBSITE
COMBINED ASSETS
ACQUISITIONS
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
TECHNOLOGY FIRMS
REALITY
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Litigation Release No. 17412 / March 14, 2002

   SEC v. Hawa Corporation, et al., Case No. 01-8220-CIV- Hurley (S.D.
   Fla.)(filed March 15, 2001)

   SEC SETTLES CASES AGAINST ILONA ALEXIS MANDELBAUM

   The Securities and Exchange Commission (Commission) announced today
   that it settled the civil injunctive action against Defendant Ilona
   Alexis Mandelbaum ("Mandelbaum") in the matter of . Mandelbaum,
   without admitting or denying the allegations in the Commission's
   Complaint, consented to the entry of a Final Judgment of Permanent
   Injunction and Other Relief which the Court entered on November 30,
   2001. The Final Judgment permanently enjoins Mandelbaum from violating
   Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Section
   10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5,
   thereunder. The Final Judgment also orders Mandelbaum to pay
   disgorgement and imposes a civil money penalty. The amount of
   disgorgement and civil penalty will be determined at a later date.

   According to the Commission's Complaint, from at least December 1999
   to March 2001, Hawa Corporation (Hawa), Hawa Communications, Inc.
   (HawaCom), and Hawa Med, Inc. (Hawa Med) raised approximately $6
   million from the sale of shares to investors throughout the U.S., most
   of whom are doctors. The Complaint also alleged that Mandelbaum, among
   others, represented to investors, orally, through marketing brochures,
   and in an Internet website, that Hawa, HawaCom, and Hawa Med had
   combined assets of $160 million attributable to the companies'
   acquisitions of three "well-established telecommunications and
   technology firms" based in South America. The Commission's Complaint
   further alleged that, in reality, neither Hawa, HawaCom, nor Hawa Med
   actually owned any interest in the South American companies. (SEC v.
   Hawa Corporation, et al., Case No. 01-8220-CIV- Hurley (S.D.
   Fla.)(filed March 15, 2001)).
     _________________________________________________________________

Modified 03/19/2002
SNIPPETS:
  • SEC SETTLES CASES AGAINST ILONA ALEXIS MANDELBAUM
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission announced today that it settled the civil injunctive
  • Mandelbaum, without admitting or denying the allegations in the Commission's Complaint,
  • The Final Judgment permanently enjoins Mandelbaum from violating Sections 5, 5and 17of the
  • The Final Judgment also orders Mandelbaum to pay disgorgement and imposes a civil money
  • According to the Commission's Complaint, from at least December 1999 to March 2001, Hawa
  • The Complaint also alleged that Mandelbaum, among others, represented to investors, orally,
  • The Commission's Complaint further alleged that, in reality, neither Hawa, HawaCom, nor Hawa
  • (SEC v. Hawa Corporation, et al., Case No. 01-8220-CIV- Hurley (S.D.
  •    |