Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C.
Litigation Release No. 17431 / March 22, 2002
Civil Action No. C2-00 622, (S.D. OH)
On December 5, 2001 the Honorable James L. Graham of the U.S. District
Court for the Southern District of Ohio, permanently enjoined
defendant Seth Miller for his role in the World Vision Entertainment,
Inc. ("World Vision") Ponzi scheme. On March 6, 2002, the Court
entered a Final Judgment of Equitable Relief against defendant Seth
Miller, ordering him to pay disgorgement and prejudgment interest of
$327,192, but waiving payment and not imposing a civil penalty based
on Miller's demonstrated inability to pay. Miller processed the notes
and acted as an unregistered broker-dealer in a nationwide Ponzi
scheme involving the offer and sale of unregistered nine-month
promissory notes issued by World Vision, a company located in
Altamonte Springs, Florida.
Specifically, the Commission's Complaint, filed on June 1, 2000,
alleged that from June 1996 to August 1999, Miller, Jamie P.
Piromalli, Steven Brewer, A. Michael Jaillett and Richard Mann
(collectively, "the Defendants"), through World Vision, raised at
least $64 million from approximately 1,200 investors in 33 states from
the sale of promissory notes. The Defendants offered and sold
securities in the form of nine-month promissory notes without
registering them with the Commission. In furtherance of the scheme,
the Defendants, directly and indirectly, through a nationwide sales
network, made numerous false and misleading statements to investors
about the World Vision notes. For example, the Defendants
misrepresented that the notes were unconditionally guaranteed and
insured and that all of the proceeds of the offering would be used to
develop World Vision's products. In reality, the notes were not
guaranteed and the Defendants used the proceeds of the note offering
to pay for the personal and business expenses of company officers and
directors, to cover interest and principal payments to investors and
to pay large, undisclosed commissions to the sales network. As a
result, when World Vision filed for bankruptcy protection in September
1999, investors lost approximately $52 million.
On December 5, 2001, the Court permanently enjoined Miller from
violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act of
1933 ("Securities Act"), and Sections 10(b), 15(a) and 15(c) of the
Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") and Rules 10b-5 and 15c1-2
thereunder. The Court had previously permanently enjoined Piromalli
from future violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the
Securities Act, Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
SNIPPETS:
On December 5, 2001 the Honorable James L. Graham of the U.S. District Court for the Southern
On March 6, 2002, the Court entered a Final Judgment of Equitable Relief against defendant
Miller processed the notes and acted as an unregistered broker-dealer in a nationwide Ponzi
Specifically, the Commission's Complaint, filed on June 1, 2000, alleged that from June 1996
The Defendants offered and sold securities in the form of nine-month promissory notes without
In furtherance of the scheme, the Defendants, directly and indirectly, through a nationwide
the Defendants misrepresented that the notes were unconditionally guaranteed and insured and
In reality, the notes were not guaranteed and the Defendants used the proceeds of the note
On December 5, 2001, the Court permanently enjoined Miller from violations of Sections 5,
The Court had also previously permanently enjoined Brewer, Jaillett and Mann for the same
|