LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v COMMERCIAL EXPRESS, LLC, et al Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-17466, CourtCode: DIS, CourtName: THAT THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO HAS ENTERED, Defendant: Commercial Express, LLC, et al., Plaintiff: SEC, State: CO Colorado, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-17466, Securities, Judgments, Commission, Exchange Commission, District Court, Relief Defendants, Civil, Colorado, Permanent, Violating, Act, Disgorgement, Prejudgment, Registration Provisions, Securities Laws, Offering, Selling Commercial Securities, Misleading, Incomplete Information, Nexgen Financial Corporation, Permanently Enjoin, Thereunder, Impose Civil Penalties, Santa Monica, California, Received Funds, Fraudulent Scheme, Delray Beach, Florida , ContentID: 120252271

Case Documents
1 2002-04-11 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 127299
1 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 1 page.    CAUTION.    PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS IS A ONE PAGE CASE.
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
JUDGMENTS
COMMISSION
DEFENDANTS
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
DISTRICT COURT
RELIEF DEFENDANTS
CIVIL
COLORADO
PERMANENT
VIOLATING
ACT
DISGORGEMENT
PREJUDGMENT
REGISTRATION PROVISIONS
SECURITIES LAWS
OFFERING
SELLING COMMERCIAL SECURITIES
MISLEADING
INCOMPLETE INFORMATION
NEXGEN FINANCIAL CORPORATION
PERMANENTLY ENJOIN
THEREUNDER
IMPOSE CIVIL PENALTIES
SANTA MONICA
CALIFORNIA
RECEIVED FUNDS
FRAUDULENT SCHEME
DELRAY BEACH
FLORIDA
United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Litigation Release No. 17466 / April 11, 2002

Civil Action No. 98-M-2014, U.S. District Court, Colorado.

   The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") announced today
   that the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado has entered
   final judgments imposing permanent injunctive and other relief against
   Commercial Express, LLC ("Commercial") and Progressive Financial, Inc.
   ("Progressive") in a case the Commission filed against these and other
   defendants in September of 1998. The Commission alleged that
   Commercial and Progressive violated the antifraud and registration
   provisions of the securities laws by offering and selling Commercial
   securities by way of false, misleading and incomplete information. The
   Court also entered a final judgment against Nexgen Financial
   Corporation ("Nexgen"), one of the relief defendants in the action.

   The final judgments against Commercial and Progressive were entered by
   default on March 18, 2002, and permanently enjoin these defendants
   from violating Sections 17(a)(1), (2) and (3) of the Securities Act of
   1933 and Sections 10(b) and 15(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
   1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The judgments further order that
   Commercial and Progressive are jointly and severally liable for
   disgorgement of $15,545,959.73 and prejudgment interest of
   $6,386,910.74, and they impose civil penalties of $550,000 on each of
   Commercial and Progressive. Commercial and Progressive were based in
   Santa Monica, California.

   The final judgment against relief defendant Nexgen was entered by
   default on March 18, 2002. The Commission alleged that Nexgen had
   received funds from Commercial and Progressive that were generated by
   the fraudulent scheme. The judgment orders that Nexgen is liable for
   disgorgement of $1,754,597.85 and prejudgment interest of $720,859.96.
   Nexgen was located in Delray Beach, Florida.

     _________________________________________________________________

Modified 04/11/2002
SNIPPETS:
  • Civil Action No. 98-M-2014, U.S. District Court, Colorado.
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission announced today that the U.S. District Court for the
  • The Commission alleged that Commercial and Progressive violated the antifraud and
  • The Court also entered a final judgment against Nexgen Financial Corporation, one of the
  • 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder.
  • The judgments further order that Commercial and Progressive are jointly and severally liable
  • Commercial and Progressive were based in Santa Monica, California.
  • The Commission alleged that Nexgen had received funds from Commercial and Progressive that
  • The judgment orders that Nexgen is liable for disgorgement of $1,754,597.85 and prejudgment
  • Nexgen was located in Delray Beach, Florida.
  •    |