LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v SCORPION TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-17478, CourtName: RESOLUTION OF A RELATED CRIMINAL PROCEEDING IN THE DISTRICT COURT FOR, Defendant: Scorpion Technologies, Inc., et al., Plaintiff: SEC, State: NY New York, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-17478, Exchange Act, Freeland, Securities, District, Exchange Commission, Scorpion, Judgement, Dudley Mihran Freeland, Stock, California, Future Violations, Thereunder, Regulation, Disgorgement, Docket, Controlling, Meaning, Previously Disgorged Pursuant, Stipulation, Defunct Registered Broker-dealer, Fraudulent Scheme, Registered Offering, Shares, Scorpion Common Stock, Suspense Docket Pending, Docket Pending Resolution, Related Criminal Proceeding, District Court, Northern District, Active Docket , ContentID: 120252259

Case Documents
1 2002-04-18 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 127287
1 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 1 page.    CAUTION.    PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS IS A ONE PAGE CASE.
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
FREELAND
SECURITIES
DISTRICT
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SCORPION
JUDGEMENT
DUDLEY MIHRAN FREELAND
STOCK
CALIFORNIA
FUTURE VIOLATIONS
THEREUNDER
REGULATION
DISGORGEMENT
DOCKET
CONTROLLING
MEANING
PREVIOUSLY DISGORGED PURSUANT
STIPULATION
DEFUNCT REGISTERED BROKER-DEALER
FRAUDULENT SCHEME
REGISTERED OFFERING
SHARES
SCORPION COMMON STOCK
SUSPENSE DOCKET PENDING
DOCKET PENDING RESOLUTION
RELATED CRIMINAL PROCEEDING
DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT
ACTIVE DOCKET
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

LITIGATION RELEASE NO. 17478 / April 18, 2002

   SEC SETTLES CHARGES AGAINST DUDLEY MIHRAN FREELAND FOR FRAUD INVOLVING
   SALES OF SCORPION STOCK

   SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION V. SCORPION TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET
   AL., 96-CIV-1005 (S.D.N.Y.)

   The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that on April 15,
   2002, the Honorable Barbara S. Jones, United States District Judge for
   the Southern District of New York, entered a Final Judgment of
   Permanent Injunction and Other Equitable Relief by Consent against
   Dudley Mihran Freeland ("Freeland") of Los Angeles County, California.
   The Final Judgment enjoins Freeland from future violations of Section
   17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the
   Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and Rules
   101 and 102 of Regulation M promulgated under Section 10(b) of the
   Exchange Act, and as a controlling person within the meaning of
   Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act, from future violations of Sections
   10(b) and 15(c)(1) of the Exchange Act and Rules 10b-3, 10b-5, 15c1-2
   and 15c1-6 thereunder, and Rules 101 and 102 of Regulation M
   promulgated under Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act. The Final
   Judgment also provides that the Commission's claim for disgorgement
   against Freeland is satisfied by the assets previously disgorged
   pursuant to the Stipulation and Order, dated December 31, 1991, in SEC
   v. H.K. Freeland & Company, Inc., 91 Civ. 7986 (S.D.N.Y.). The
   Commission's Amended Complaint filed May 9, 1996 alleged that
   Freeland, through H.K. Freeland & Company, a now defunct registered
   broker-dealer, participated in a fraudulent scheme involving a
   registered offering of two million shares of Scorpion common stock.
   This case, which had been put on the suspense docket pending
   resolution of a related criminal proceeding in the District Court for
   the Northern District of California, was restored to the active docket
   in July 2001.
     _________________________________________________________________

Modified 04/18/2002
SNIPPETS:
  • U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • SEC SETTLES CHARGES AGAINST DUDLEY MIHRAN FREELAND FOR FRAUD INVOLVING SALES OF SCORPION STOCK
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that on April 15, 2002, the Honorable
  • The Final Judgment enjoins Freeland from future violations of Section 17of the Securities Act egulation M promulgated under Section 10of the Exchange Act.
  • The Final Judgment also provides that the Commission's claim for disgorgement against
  • The Commission's Amended Complaint filed May 9, 1996 alleged that Freeland, through H.K.
  • This case, which had been put on the suspense docket pending resolution of a related criminal
  •    |