 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
PETITIONERS BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
SHARES PEAPOD PETITIONERS MERGER EXHIBIT RESPONDENT JUDGEMENT PURCHASE COMMITTEE COURT CONTROLLING VALUATION DIRECTORS JANIS MEIJA ENTITLING PRICE DISCLOSE SPECIAL COMMITTEE RECOMMEND MEMBERS CONFLICT CHAIRMAN CHANCERY DELAWARE OUTSTANDING SHARES DEL FUTURE PROSPECTS SUPR FACTS |
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
lN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY /
JANIS MEIJA JR. & ASSOC., P.C.
and JANIS MEIJA SEP-IRA,
Petitioners, HON. JUDGE LAMB
v Civil Action No. 19179-NC `~~.
PEAPOD, INC.
Respondent.
Janis Meija (P17593) Glenn Kurtz
Janis Meija, Jr. & Assoc., P.C. White & Case, LLP
Attorney for Petitioners 1155 Avenue of the Americas
321 W. Lake Lansing Road, Ste. 100 New York, NY 10036-2797
East Lansing, MI 48823
(517) 336-7115
Samuel A. Nolen
Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.
One Rodney Square
P.O. Box 551
Wilmington, Delaware 19899
I
PETITIONERS' BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF
APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
A. Background
On July 16,2001, Peapod, an online grocer, announced it had signed a definitive
merger agreement with Royal Ahold, a large international food concern. At the time of
the merger agreement, Royal Ahold already owned a controlling interest in Peapod.
r--t--------
SNIPPETS:
|
|
2
.
RESPONSE TO APPRAISAL PETITION
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
JANIS MEIJA PARAGRAPH ALLEGATIONS PEAPOD PETITION COURT DELAWARE JANIS MEIJA SEP-IRA HEREBY RESPONDENT LACKS KNOWLEDGE INFORMATION SUFFICIENT ADMIT FEES CHANCERY ASSOC DENY LAW PLEADING EXPENSES CONNECTION LANSING BEAN ACQUISITION CORPORATION STOCKHOLDERS HERETOFORE WITHDRAWN CHARLES SCHWAB CUST AFFIANT SAYEM SWORN |
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
JANIS MEIJA JR. & ASSOC., P.C. and
JANIS MEIJA SEP-IRA,
Petitioners, i Civil Action No. 19179-NC
V. i
>
PEAPOD, INC.,
;
Respondent. 1 -
,~
RESPONSE TO APPRAISAL PETITION
Respondent Peapod, Inc. ("Respondent") hereby responds to the Petition of Janis MZ?ja
& Assoc., P.C. and Janis Meija SEP-IRA ("Petitioners"), as follows: I--
_ .~
1 . Respondent lacks knowledge or information sufficient to enable it to admit
the allegations of paragraph 1.
2 . Admitted.
3 . Respondent lacks knowledge or information sufficient to enable it to admit or
the allegations of paragraph 3.
4. Respondent lacks knowledge or information sufficient to enable it to admit or
the allegations of paragraph 4.
5. Admitted.
6 . The allegations of paragraph 6 state a conclusion of law as to which no
pleading is required.
7 . Denied, except admitted that in paragraph 7, Petitioners state that they make
assertions.
8. Denied.
RLFl-2393913-1
SNIPPETS:
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
