LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

HALL v GIMMEABID.COM Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 19,284, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff: HALL, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00019284, Demand Letter, Request, Form Sb-2, Exhibit, Inspection, Shareholders, Del, Securities, Exchange Commission, Delaware, Amendment, Complaint, Copying, Permit, Offering Price, Document Speaks, Pursuant, Texas, Mismanagement, Decrease, Payment, Tantamount, Denying Plaintiff, Paid, Investment, Franchise Tax, Internet Site, Written Contracts Showing, Thomas, Hall, Registered Agent, Plaintiff Fails, Relief, Proper, Certificate, Filings, Second Affirmative Defense, Proper Purpose, Unclean Hands , ContentID: 120252128

Case Documents
1 2001-12-21 ANSWER
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 127228
3 pages
PDF
2 2001-11-06 COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 126834
7 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 2 documents , 10 pages
Price: $ 24.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . ANSWER

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COMPLAINT
DEFENDANT
EXHIBIT
DOCUMENT SPEAKS
COURT
THOMAS
HALL
REGISTERED AGENT
DELAWARE
PLAINTIFF FAILS
RELIEF
PROPER
CERTIFICATE
FILINGS
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
PROPER PURPOSE
DEL
UNCLEAN HANDS
WHEREFORE
DEFENDANT GIMMEABIDCOM
REQUESTS JUDGMENT
AWARD
COSTS
ATTORNEYS
FEES
COURT DEEMS
HEREBY CERTIFY
                 IN THE COURT  OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

                               IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY


     THOMAS J. HALL,

                                      Plaintiff,          1

                 v.                                       i    C.A. No. 19284-NC                 y:~
                                                                                          .~~

     GIMMEABID.COM,  INC.,                                i                                        
                                                                                                   
                                      Defendant.          I



                 1.    Paragraph  1  ofthe  Complaint states a legal conclusion to which no response

     is  reqired.  It is admitted that attached to the Complaint as Exhibit A is a copy of a letter

     dated August 13, 2001, from Plaintiff Thomas J. Hall ("Plaintiff') to Defendant

     GimmeaBid.com,  Inc. ("Defendant"), which document speaks for itself

                 2.    Admitted that Plaintiff is a shareholder of Defendant.

                 3.    Admitted that Defendant is a corporation organized under the laws of the

     StateofDelaware,  doingbusiness at  2100NorthMainStreet,  Suite215,  Box22,Fort Worth,

     Texas 76106. Further admitted that the Corporation Trust Company, 1209 Orange Street,

     Wilmington, Delaware  lOSO  ("Registered Agent") is Defendant's registered agent.

                 4.    Denied, except admitted that attached to the Complaint as Exhibit A is a copy

     of a letter dated  August  13,2001,  from Plaintiff to Defendant, which document speaks for

     itself.
,i,`"z'w\vP,~



         5 .      Denied, except admitted that attached to the Complaint as Exhibit B is a copy

of an envelope, which document speaks for itself.

SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • It is admitted that attached to the Complaint as Exhibit A is a copy of a letter
  • dated August 13, 2001, from Plaintiff Thomas J. Hall to Defendant
  • GimmeaBid.com, Inc., which document speaks for itself
  • Admitted that Plaintiff is a shareholder of Defendant.
  • Delaware lOSO ("Registered Agent") is Defendant's registered agent.
  • is stated in Defendant's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
  • Plaintiff fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
  • SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
  • Plaintiff fails to state a proper purpose as required by 8 Del,
  • unclean hands.
  • WHEREFORE, Defendant GimmeaBidcom, Inc. requests judgment in its favor with
  • an award of costs, attorneys' fees, and any other relief the Court deems just and proper.
  • CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
  • HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 21st day of December, 2001, two copies of the

  • 2 . COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DEFENDANT
    DEMAND LETTER
    REQUEST
    FORM SB-2
    INSPECTION
    SHAREHOLDERS
    DEL
    SECURITIES
    EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    AMENDMENT
    COURT
    COPYING
    EXHIBIT
    PERMIT
    OFFERING PRICE
    DELAWARE
    PURSUANT
    TEXAS
    MISMANAGEMENT
    DECREASE
    BUSINESS
    PAYMENT
    TANTAMOUNT
    DENYING PLAINTIFF
    PAID
    INVESTMENT
    FRANCHISE TAX
    INTERNET SITE
    WRITTEN CONTRACTS SHOWING
    
                                                                                         .--
                                                                                      RIGINA,L /J
          IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                           IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    THOMAS J. HALL
    
                   Plaintiff
    
                                                  Civil Action No.  /yg  Tq  /vc
    
    GIMMEABID.COM,  INC.
           A Delaware corporation
    
                   Defendant
    
    
                          COMPLAINT UNDER 8 DEL. C. 8 220(c)
    
           Plaintiff Thomas J. Hall ("Plaintiff'), pro se, for his Complaint against
    
    GimmeaBid.com, Inc. (`Defendant") alleges as follows:
    
           1.      This action, brought pursuant to 8 Del. C. $220(c),  seeks relief in the form
    
    of an order compelling the Defendant to make certain records available for inspection and
    
    copying by Plaintiff, as demanded by Plaintiff in a notarized demand letter dated August
    
    13. 2001, (the "Demand Letter"). A copy of the Demand Letter which is attached as
    
    Exhibit A.
    
           2       At all times relevant to this action, Plaintiff has been a shareholder of
    
    Defendant.
    
           3.      At all times relevant to this action, Defendant was a general corporation
    
    organized under the laws of the State of Delaware (DE Corp. No. 209 1190). Defendant can
    
                                                -l-
    
    
    
    be served through the Corporation Trust Company, 1209 Orange Street, Wilmington, DE
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • Plaintiff Thomas J. Hall, pro se, for his Complaint against
  • brought pursuant to 8 Del.
  • of an order compelling the Defendant to make certain records available for inspection and
  • copying by Plaintiff, as demanded by Plaintiff in a notarized demand letter dated August
  • requesting that Defendant permit inspection of certain records of Defendant as set forth in
  • is attached as Exhibit B.
  • request, the Demand Letter to Corporate Trust Company, 1209 Orange Street, Wilmington,
  • Defendant's shareholders as of November 13,2000, but demands the payment of $500.00
  • A current list of shareholders is an ordinary and necessary business
  • said list of shareholders is not readily available, this is evidence of mismanagement by the
  • $500.00 for a current list of shareholders and such demand is tantamount to denying
  • Plaintiff paid $500.00 for a current list of shareholders that Plaintiff would not be allowed
  • Defendant's restriction on copying is tantamount to denying Plaintiff the right
  • investment in Defendant.
  • Defendant's Form SB-2 dated May 1:
  • Securities and Exchange Commission on May 16,2000, listed an offering price of $19.00
  • Exchange Commission on August 18, 2000, listed an offering price of $19.00 per share.
  • Defendant's Form SB-2, Amendment No. 2, `riled with the Securities and Exchange
  • from $19.00 per share to $7.00 per share represents a decrease of approximately 63%.
  • Defendant had not filed its 2000 annual franchise tax return nor
  • Accounts Internet site, Defendant was not listed as a foreign corporation qualified to do
  • business in Texas as of the date of the Demand Letter,
  • Form SB-2 written contracts showing Defendant's address as being in Texas;
  • wrongfully refused to permit said inspection after Plaintiffhad articulated a proper purpose
  •    |