LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

JEFFREY ALEXANDER STERLING v GEORGE TENET Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: JASVGT210830, CourtName: MISC 2, Plaintiff: JEFFREY ALEXANDER STERLING, State: NY New York, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>JASVGT210830, Cia, Complainant, Security, Employment, American, Participation, Eeo Process, Mgmt, Requircmurt, Declare, Disparate Treatment, Cl4, Award Complainant, Alexander Sterling, Basis, Protect4, Retaliation, Race, Operatioprll, Certifioation, Serving, Duties, Tenure, Management, Mame, Non-african, Career , ContentID: 120252039

Case Documents
1 2001-08-28 COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 126650
5 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 5 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . COMPLAINT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COMPLAINANT
SECURITY
EMPLOYMENT
AMERICAN
PARTICIPATION
EEO PROCESS
MGMT
REQUIRCMURT
DECLARE
DISPARATE TREATMENT
CL4
ATTORNEY
COUNSEL
AWARD COMPLAINANT
ALEXANDER STERLING
BASIS
MEMBER
PROTECT4
RETALIATION
RACE
OPERATIOPRLL
CERTIFIOATION
SERVING
DUTIES
TENURE
MANAGEMENT
MAME
NON-AFRICAN
CAREER
UNITED  STATES  DM'RICT              COURT
SOIJTHERN        IbISTRIm       OF  NEW  YORK
                                                        X            Case No.

J&y  Alexander Sterling
(ah  PAME  MDACTED  BY CIA])
                 -plaintifF

       -against-

George Tenet
Director, Central Intelligence Agency
John Doe (1-M) -defendants-
                                                        X
                                               COMPLAlNT

I.  It is hereby compkined that J&i&y  Alexander Stertig  (&a  PAME  REDACTED  BY CLA];
   h&nafter  referred to as Complainant) was subje&d  to employment discrhnination on t,he
   basis of me  (African  America)  as a member of (1) a protect4  category; and (2) treated

   differ&  than no#-African  American of&era  Complainant was also subjected to
   retaliation for participation in the Equal Employmat  Opportunity (hereinafter referred to as

   EEO) ~roccss.
PLAINTIFF:
2,  An employee with the Central Intelligence Agency  (hereinafkr  referred to as CIA)  as an

   Opemiions Officer  (hereinafter  referred to as 00).
DEFENDANTS

3.  Cbrge  Tenet is the birector  of the CIA  and is responsible for  actions of the CIA.  The John
   Does indicated are c;overt employees of the CIA who participated in the dis~rimUion  ahd
   ret&Yion  against Complainant,



4.  The United St&s  District Court for the Southern District of New York has jdction        over
   New York County [ % LINE  REDACTED  BY CIA].

                                           ALLEGATIONS
5.  compl*r         joined  the CIA in May 1993 as an 00.  Complainant successfully completed

   required trainiag  and obtained certifioation as an 00  in December 1994. After  certification,
   Complainant served ia the Wastigton,  bc  area; au oversa  posting; and [l/2  LINE

   REDAC'fEb  BY CIA].  Complainaut was serving in the capacity of an 00  in the [ONE
   WORD REDACTED  BY CIA] when he was subjected to disc&i&ion  on the basis of race

   @ican  American) and retaliation for  participation in the EEO process.
SNIPPETS:
  • (ah PAME MDACTED BY CIA])
  • It is hereby compkined that J&i&y Alexander Stertig (&a PAME REDACTED BY CLA]; h&nafter
  • required trainiag and obtained certifioation as an 00 in December 1994.
  • Complainaut was serving in the capacity of an 00 in the when he was subjected to disc&i&ion
  • @ican American) and retaliation for participation in the EEO process.
  • Complam@ arrived ia New York January 1999* Complainant%- duties were to iuclude those
  • Complainant's tenure at the,
  • management included: COS NAME REDACTED BY CIA]; DCOS; C/OPS mAME REDACTED BY CIA]; and C/SIB
  • Complainant was therefore efF&vely pre&ded f10m career advancement poteatial89 em
  • Unequd working ewironment whereby he was lmable to compete with non-African American 00s.
  • was subjected to from the start of his tour at the, Complainant was rqxakdly passed over for
  • REDACTED BY CL4].
  • Mgmt subjected Compk&nt to retaliation for his
  • Security processing is an arbitraty regime within the CIA that is
  • Complaiu&nt's participation in the EEO process when q&&d security processing was
  • The disparate treatment that CompIaiuant underwent at the [ONE WORD REDACTED BY
  • CIA interfered with Complainant's Constitutional right to access to an attorney.
  • Complainant firlly complied with this requircmurt and did not have substantive discussions
  • Complainant was effectively de&d the access to or benefit of counsel during the EEO PrOcesS.
  • Complainaut Jefsay Alexander Sterling (aka [NAME REbACTED BY
  • kated differently than officers not in the same protected category; Declare that the CIA
  • Award Complainant the costs of the action and reaso&le attorney's fees under ti
  •    |