LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

IN RE PHILIP SERVICES CORP SECURITIES LITIGATION Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: IRPSCSL251470, CourtName: MISC 2, State: NY New York, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>IRPSCSL251470, Registration Statement, Philip Common Stock, Philip, Common Stock, Financial Statements, Paragraphs, Offering, Misleading, Inventory, Act, Pursuant, Gaap, Serv-tech Registration Statement, Deloitte, Violations, Materially False, Audit, Accordance, Shares, Sub-classes, Underwriter, Securities Act, Exchange Act, Earnings, Price, Allwaste Registration Statement, Class Period, Disclosure, Backwardation, United States, Class Action, Management, Cmp, Accounting, Underwriter Defendants , ContentID: 120252036

Case Documents
1   AMENDED COMPLAINT II
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 126647
67 pages
PDF
2 1996-02-28 AMENDED COMPLAINT I
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 126646
111 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 2 documents , 178 pages
Price: $ 24.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . AMENDED COMPLAINT II

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INVENTORY
ACT
PARAGRAPHS
MISLEADING
GAAP
DELOITTE
PLAINTIFFS
DEFENDANTS
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
VIOLATIONS
AUDIT
ACCORDANCE
SECURITIES ACT
EXCHANGE ACT
SERV-TECH REGISTRATION STATEMENT
COMMON STOCK
CLASS PERIOD
DISCLOSURE
BACKWARDATION
MANAGEMENT
CMP
ACCOUNTING
UNDERWRITER DEFENDANTS
AUDIT OPINIONS
PROSPECTUS
COMMISSION
CONNECTION
ALLWASTE MERGER
       1.      As discussed below in paragraphs 320 through 323,

Philip repeatedly undertook massive inventory builds during

periods of backwardation.


                                     X.

                    VIOLATIONS OF GAAP AND SEC REGULATIONS

       2.      The SEC requires that publicly-traded companies present

their financial statements in accordance with GAAP. 17 C.F.R.

210.4-01(a)(1).

       3.      Financial statements filed with the SEC which are not

prepared in accordance with GAAP "will be presumed to be

misleading or inaccurate, despite footnote or other disclosures,

unless the Commission has otherwise provided." 17 C.F.R.

210.4-01(a)(1).

       4.      Item 303 of Regulation S-K, promulgated by the SEC

under the Exchange Act, imposes a duty on public companies to

disclose in periodic reports filed with the SEC "known trends or

any known demands, commitments, events or uncertainties" that are

reasonably likely to have a material impact on a company's

revenues, income or liquidity, or to cause previously reported

financial information not to be indicative of future operations

results. 17 C.F.R. § 220.303(a)(1)-(3) and Instruction 3.

       5.      In addition to the period reports required under the

Exchange Act, management of a public company has a duty "to make

full and prompt announcement of material facts regarding the

SNIPPETS:
  • As discussed below in paragraphs 320 through 323,
  • Philip repeatedly undertook massive inventory builds during
  • VIOLATIONS OF GAAP AND SEC REGULATIONS
  • their financial statements in accordance with GAAP.
  • Financial statements filed with the SEC which are not
  • misleading or inaccurate, despite footnote or other disclosures,
  • Exchange Act, management of a public company has a duty "to make
  • and the Serv-Tech Registration Statement that Philip's
  • exchange has taken place (Statement of Financial Accounting
  • As described below in paragraph 358, Philip
  • Disclosure is
  • 1292 / CMP / 00029342.WPD v1 103
  • the Management Defendants deliberately caused Philip to
  • Class Period were presented in a manner which violated GAAP in
  • Deloitte served as the Company's outside auditors since
  • McSorely and Hoey were therefore well versed in Deloitte's audit
  • These unqualified audit opinions were materially false and
  • Section 13or 15of the Securities Exchange Commission Act
  • In connection with the November 1997 Offering,
  • jointly and severally liable to plaintiffs and the other members
  • market was in a backwardation condition.
  • The Company's 1993 Prospectus, issued in connection
  • 17,250,000 shares of common stock (including the exercise of the
  • Underwriter Defendants, in turn, sold the common stock directly

  • 2 . AMENDED COMPLAINT I

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    PHILIP COMMON STOCK
    COMMON STOCK
    PLAINTIFFS
    OFFERING
    PURSUANT
    PARAGRAPHS
    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
    DEFENDANTS
    MISLEADING
    MATERIALLY FALSE
    SHARES
    SUB-CLASSES
    UNDERWRITER
    EARNINGS
    PRICE
    ALLWASTE REGISTRATION STATEMENT
    SERV-TECH REGISTRATION STATEMENT
    UNITED STATES
    CLASS ACTION
    MISREPRESENTATIONS
    GAAP
    METALS RECOVERY
    RELEVANT TIMES
    RESTATEMENT
    MISSTATEMENTS
    LEAD PLAINTIFF
    SECURITIES
    INVESTMENT BANKING FIRM
    TOTAL PROCEEDS
    
    27343_1.wp
    
                          UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                         SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
    
    ------------------------------x:             Civil Action No.
    IN RE: PHILIP SERVICES CORP. :               98 CV 835 (MBM)
    SECURITIES LITIGATION            ::
    ------------------------------x:             CONSOLIDATED AND AMENDED
    THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:        :           CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
    ALL ACTIONS                      ::          JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
    ------------------------------x
    
            Plaintiffs, individually and on behalf of all other persons
    
    similarly situated, by their undersigned attorneys, for their
    
    consolidated and amended class action complaint, allege upon
    
    personal knowledge as to themselves and their own acts, and upon
    
    information and belief as to all other matters, based upon, inter
    
    alia, the investigation, as detailed in paragraph 14 below, made
    
    by and through their attorneys:
    
    
                                           I.
    
                                NATURE OF ACTION
    
            1.    Plaintiffs bring this lawsuit as a class action on
    
    behalf of themselves and all purchasers of Philip Services Corp.
    
    ("Philip" or the "Company") common stock and call options during
    
    the period February 28, 1996 through and including May 7, 1998
    
    (the "Class Period"), and on behalf of sub-classes consisting of:
    
     a) all purchasers of Philip common stock issued in the secondary
    
    public offering (the "November 1997 Offering") pursuant to the
    
    Registration Statement declared effective by the Securities and
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • Plaintiffs, individually and on behalf of all other persons
  • Plaintiffs bring this lawsuit as a class action on
  • and on behalf of sub-classes consisting of:
  • all purchasers of Philip common stock issued in the secondary
  • public offering pursuant to the
  • Registration Statement dated November 6,
  • Philip common stock, pursuant to the Registration Statement dated
  • persons whose shares of Serv-Tech,
  • defendants' violations of the federal securities laws.
  • defendants caused Philip to
  • publicly reported revenues, earnings, assets and liabilities.
  • the defendants issued a false and misleading
  • of both Canadian and United States Generally Accepted Accounting
  • disclosure regarding its previous misstatements in a press
  • by the former Chief Financial Officer of the Metals Recovery
  • the price of Philip common stock plunged to $6
  • Statement, the Allwaste Registration Statement, the Serv-Tech
  • Lead Plaintiff Gabriel DiRienzo made the following
  • misstatements and misrepresentations:
  • pursuant to the Serv-Tech Registration Statement.
  • materially false and misleading November 1997 Registration
  • at all relevant times hereto,
  • $0.66 per share or total proceeds of approximately $2,174,000.
  • Merrill was a co-lead underwriter in a syndicate
  • a national brokerage and investment banking firm.
  • and misleading by virtue of the restatement of its financial
  •    |