LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

VISION TWENTY-ONE CLASS ACTION LITIGATION Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: VTOCAL220080, CourtName: CLASS ACTION II, State: FL Florida, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>VTOCAL220080, Vision, Common Stock, Gillette, Class Action, Block Vision, Damages, Affiliates, Eye Care, Business Units, Acquisitions, Accounting System, District, Lads, Incorrect Financial Information, Market Prices, Material Facts, Exchange Act, Misleading, Public Filings, Vision Buying Group, Block Vision Buying, Management, Sustained Damages, Allegations, States District Court, Managed Care, Integration, Entry, Jlg, Assignment, Docket, Filing Fee, Magistrate, Michael, Welch, Richard, Theodore , ContentID: 120251989

Case Documents
1 1999-02-12 DOCKET
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 126501
3 pages
TXT
2 1997-12-05 COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 126500
34 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 2 documents , 37 pages
Price: $ 24.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . DOCKET

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
ENTRY
JLG
ASSIGNMENT
VISION
DOCKET
FILING FEE
MAGISTRATE
MICHAEL
WELCH
RICHARD
GILLETTE
THEODORE
SECURITIES
DEMAND
JURY
JUDGE
COURT
DISTRICT
JLH
CTC
LOCAL RULE
DESIGNATION
JNB
CONSENTS
FILING FEE PAID
ATTACHMENTS
CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
SECURITIES CLASS ACTION
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
Docket as of February 12, 1999 (retrieved 3/4/99)

Proceedings include all events.
8:99cv138 McBride v. Vision Twenty-One, et al
                                                                         MSS
                                                            MSS
                       U.S. District Court
               Middle District of Florida (Tampa)

               CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 99-CV-138

McBride v. Vision Twenty-One, et al                         Filed: 01/22/99
Assigned to: Judge Henry L. Adams, Jr.       Jury demand: Plaintiff
Demand: $0,000                               Nature of Suit:  850
Lead Docket: None                            Jurisdiction: Federal Question
Dkt# in other court: None

Cause: 15:0078m(a) Securities Exchange Act


TAD MCBRIDE                       Jules Brody
     plaintiff                    (COR LD NTC)
                                  Aaron Brody
                                  (COR LD)
                                  Tzvia Brody
                                  (COR LD)
                                  Stull, Stull & Brody
                                  6 East 45th Street
                                  New York, NY 10017
                                  212/687-7230

                                  Mark J. Heise
                                  (COR LD)
                                  Michael E. Criden
                                  (COR LD NTC)
                                  Hanzman, Criden, Korge &
                                  Chaykin, P.A.
                                  200 S. Biscayne Blvd.
                                  2100 1st Union Financial Center
                                  Miami, FL 33131
                                  305-579-1222

                                  Stanley M. Grossman
                                  (COR LD NTC)
                                  Patrick V. Dahlstrom
                                  (COR LD)
                                  Linda P. Nussbaum
                                  (COR LD)
SNIPPETS:
  • Docket as of February 12,
  • U.S. District Court
  • Middle District of Florida
  • Judge Henry L. Adams,
  • Jury demand: Plaintiff
  • Cause: 15:0078mSecurities Exchange Act
  • VISION TWENTY-ONE, INC. defendant
  • 1/22/99 1 SECURITIES CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT and jury trial demanded
  • filed with attachments
  • 1/22/99 -- MAGISTRATE JUDGE CASE ASSIGNMENT Magistrate assigned:
  • Mary S. Scriven (jlg) (Entry date 01/25/99)
  • 1/22/99 -- FILING FEE PAID.
  • 1/28/99 -- SUMMONSissued for Vision Twenty-One, Theodore N.
  • Gillette, Richard T. Welch, Michael P.
  • Consents
  • 2/12/99 2 NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - TRACK 2.

  • 2 . COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DEFENDANTS
    COMMON STOCK
    PLAINTIFF
    GILLETTE
    CLASS ACTION
    BLOCK VISION
    DAMAGES
    AFFILIATES
    EYE CARE
    MEMBERS
    BUSINESS UNITS
    ACQUISITIONS
    ACCOUNTING SYSTEM
    DISTRICT
    LADS
    INCORRECT FINANCIAL INFORMATION
    MARKET PRICES
    MATERIAL FACTS
    EXCHANGE ACT
    MISLEADING
    PUBLIC FILINGS
    VISION BUYING GROUP
    BLOCK VISION BUYING
    MANAGEMENT
    SUSTAINED DAMAGES
    ALLEGATIONS
    STATES DISTRICT COURT
    MANAGED CARE
    INTEGRATION
    
                      UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                   FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
                             TAMPA DIVISION
    
    -----------------------------------x
                                       :
                                       :   CASE NO. 99-171-CIV-T-26A
    ROBERT ROSEN,                      :
                                       :
                        Plaintiff,     :
                                       :
         v.                            :   CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
                                       :
    VISION TWENTY-ONE, INC., THEODORE  :
    N. GILLETTE, and RICHARD T. WELCH, :
                                       :
                        Defendants.    :   Jury Trial Demanded
                                       :
    -----------------------------------x
    
              Plaintiff individually and on behalf of all others
    
    similarly situated, alleges as follows upon information and
    
    belief, except as to those allegations concerning Plaintiff, which
    
    are alleged upon personal knowledge.  Plaintiff's information and
    
    belief is based, inter alia, on the investigation made by and
    
    through his attorneys, which investigation included, without
    
    limitation, a review and analysis of various articles about, and
    
    public filings of, Vision Twenty-One, Inc. ("Vision Twenty-One" or
    
    the "Company").
    
                           NATURE OF THE CASE
    
              1.   This is a class action on behalf of all persons,
    
    other than Defendants and their affiliates, who purchased Vision
    
    Twenty-One common stock during the period December 5, 1997,
    
    through November 5, 1998, inclusive (the "Class Period"), and who
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
  • FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
  • VISION TWENTY-ONE, INC., THEODORE:
  • Plaintiff individually and on behalf of all others
  • This is a class action on behalf of all persons,
  • other than Defendants and their affiliates,
  • Twenty-One common stock during the period December 5, 1997,
  • series of materially false and misleading public statements about
  • its earnings, revenues expenses, accounting system, and the
  • integration of its numerous acquisitions.
  • members of the Class who purchased the Company's stock.
  • its business units had not been operating on
  • matter of this action pursuant to Section 27 of the Exchange Act,
  • Largo, Florida, provides management and administrative services to
  • According to the Company's most recent public filings,
  • Theodore N. Gillette was Chairman of the
  • CLASS ACTION ALLEGATIONS
  • members sustained damages arising out of Defendants' wrongful
  • duty to convey material facts or to correct
  • whether the market prices of Vision Twenty-One common stock during the Class Period were
  • , providing eye care services.
  • Block Vision 458,365 shares
  • upon its ability to negotiate managed care contracts with Health
  • Company's LADS.
  • Block Vision Buying Group and the LADs.
  •    |