LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

VIDEOLAN TECHNOLOGIES CLASS ACTION LITIGATION Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: VTCAL235542, CourtName: CLASS ACTION II, State: KY Kentucky, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>VTCAL235542, Videolan, Warrants, Securities, Common Stock, Complaint, Act, United States District, States District Court, Public Statements, Steven Shaw, Brent Berti, Class Period, Samsung Agreement, Videolan Technologies, United States, Representations, Rothenberg, Vernon Jackson, Federal Securities Laws, Exchange Act, Ted Ralston, Peter Beck, Louisville, Market Price, Misrepresentations, Times Relevant, Certification, Heyburn, Judge John, Entry, Dismiss, Motion, Docket, Dft, Conference , ContentID: 120251987

Case Documents
1   COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 126497
13 pages
TXT
2 1998-04-13 DOCKET
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 126498
13 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 2 documents , 26 pages
Price: $ 24.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . COMPLAINT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
VIDEOLAN
PLAINTIFFS
WARRANTS
SECURITIES
COMMON STOCK
COMPLAINT
ACT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT
STATES DISTRICT COURT
PUBLIC STATEMENTS
STEVEN SHAW
BRENT BERTI
MEMBERS
CLASS PERIOD
SAMSUNG AGREEMENT
VIDEOLAN TECHNOLOGIES
UNITED STATES
REPRESENTATIONS
ROTHENBERG
VERNON JACKSON
FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS
EXCHANGE ACT
TED RALSTON
PETER BECK
LOUISVILLE
MARKET PRICE
MISREPRESENTATIONS
TIMES RELEVANT
CERTIFICATION
                    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                        WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY
                            LOUISVILLE DIVISION

   -------------------------------------------------------
   BRENT BERTI and STEVEN SHAW,
   individually and on behalf of all others
   similarly situated,

                         Plaintiffs,

              - v. -

   VIDEOLAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
   JOHN HAINES, PETER BECK, STEVEN
   ROTHENBERG, VERNON JACKSON and
   TED RALSTON,

                         Defendants.
   -------------------------------------------------------

   :
   :
   :
   :
   :
   :
   :
   :
   :
   :
   :
   :
   :
   :

   Civil Action No. (97-CV-00296)
   CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
   JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
   MAY 9, 1997

   Plaintiffs, by their attorneys, for their Class Action Complaint (the
   "Complaint"), allege the following upon personal knowledge as to
   themselves and to their own acts and upon information and belief as to
   all other matters, based in part upon the investigation of Plaintiffs
   attorneys, including, among other things, the review and analysis of
   public statements, publicly-filed documents of Videolan Technologies,
   Inc. ("Videolan" or the "Company"), press releases and news articles.
SNIPPETS:
  • CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT JURY TRIAL DEMANDED MAY 9,
  • Plaintiffs, by their attorneys, for their Class Action Complaint, allege the following upon
  • This is a securities class action on behalf of public investors who purchased the common
  • This case involves false representations made by the Defendants to the investing public that
  • Defendants' misrepresentations regarding the Samsung Agreement created the illusion that
  • The misrepresentations caused the price of Videolan's stock to increase dramatically, and the
  • This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to Section 27 of the Securities
  • Videolan is headquartered in this District in Louisville, Kentucky, and many of the acts
  • In connection with the wrongs alleged herein, Defendants used the instrumentalities of
  • Plaintiff Brent Berti purchased Videolan Securities during the Class Period and was damaged
  • Plaintiff Steven Shaw purchased Videolan Securities during the Class Period and was damaged
  • At all times relevant to this action, Defendant Ted Ralston was the Chairman of Videolan's
  • At all times relevant to this action, Defendant Steven Rothenberg was the Vice President
  • Defendant Vernon Jackson was President of Videolan from May 1994 to January 1996.
  • At all times relevant to this action, Defendant Peter Beck was employed as Videolan's Chief
  • As officers, directors and/or controlling persons of a company which is registered with the ct any previously issued statements from any source which were materially misleading or untrue, so
  • The Defendants' representations during the Class Period violated these specific requirements
  • My transactions in the common stock and warrants of Videolan Technologies, Inc. during the
  • During the three years prior to the date of this Certificate, I have sought to serve as a

  • 2 . DOCKET

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    JUDGE JOHN
    PLAINTIFF
    ENTRY
    DISMISS
    MOTION
    COUNSEL
    DOCKET
    DFT
    CONFERENCE
    VIDEOLAN TECHNOLOGIE
    DEFENDANT
    CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINT
    RESPONSE
    DISM
    AGREED ORDER
    COURT
    DISTRICT
    MATTER
    TELEPHONE CONF
    ABATEMENT
    PLEADING
    MOT
    RESP
    EXTENDING
    EXTENTION
    REMARK AGREED ORDER
    PARRY
    RON
    CAPITAL LENDING NETWORKS
    
    Docket as of April 13, 1998 (retrieved 5/2/98)
    
    Proceedings include all events.                                          LEADTR
    3:97cv296     Berti, et al v. Videolan Technologie, et al         CSSTAY
                                                                             FILESB
                                                                LEADTR CSSTAY
                                                                FILESB
                           U.S. District Court
                Western District of Kentucky (Louisville)
    
                   CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 97-CV-296
    
    Berti, et al v. Videolan Technologie, et al                 Filed: 05/09/97
    Assigned to: Judge John G. Heyburn, II       Jury demand: Both
    Demand: $0,000                               Nature of Suit:  850
    Lead Docket: None                            Jurisdiction: Federal Question
    Dkt# in other court: None
    
    Cause: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
    
    
    BRENT BERTI                       Ron R. Parry
         plaintiff                    (COR LD NTC)
                                      Arnzen, Parry & Wentz
                                      128 E. Second Street
                                      P.O. Box 472
                                      Covington, KY 41012-0472
                                      606-431-6100
                                      FTS 431-3778
    
                                      Andrew M. Schatz
                                      (COR LD NTC)
                                      Jeffrey S. Nobel
                                      (COR LD NTC)
                                      Schatz & Nobel
                                      216 Main Street
                                      Hartford, CN 06106
                                      860-493-6292
    
                                      Mark C. Gardy
                                      (COR LD NTC)
                                      Karin E. Fisch
                                      (COR LD NTC)
                                      Abbey, Gardy & Squitieri
                                      212 E. 39th Street
                                      New York, NY 10016
                                      212-889-3700
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • Docket as of April 13,
  • U.S. District Court
  • Western District of Kentucky
  • Assigned to: Judge John G. Heyburn,
  • CAPITAL LENDING NETWORKS, INC. Ron R. Parry
  • 12/23/97 -- REMARK agreed order for extention
  • 12/23/97 13 AGREED ORDER by Judge John G. Heyburn II extending till
  • 1/23/98 for plaintiff to resp to mot to dism (cc:
  • counsel)
  • 1/23/98 14 RESPONSE by plaintiff to motion to dismiss plaintiffs
  • consolidated amended complaint; order tendered
  • (Entry date 01/26/98)
  • 1/23/98 -- BEGIN VOLUME # 2 with pleaDING # 14.
  • 2/12/98 15 REPLY by defendant to response to motion to dismiss
  • 2/23/98 -- FILE SUBMITTED to Judge Heyburn re: M. Dism.
  • 2/27/98 16 NOTICE OF ABATEMENT by Videolan Technologie
  • 2/27/98 17 ORDER by Judge John G. Heyburn II; telephone conf.
  • 3/13/98 18 ORDER ON CONFERENCE by Judge John G. Heyburn II,
  • STAYED as to dft Videolan Technologies, Inc.,;
  • This matter stands
  •    |