5601d No. 25
Anthony Roberts et al.,
Respondents,
v.
General Electric Company,
Appellant, et al.,
Defendant, UE&C Catalytic, a Division of Raytheon Constructors Inc.,
Third-Party Appellant, et al., Third-Party Defendant.
_________________________________________________________________
2002 NY Int. 29
March 19, 2002
This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before
publication in the New York Reports.
Peter S. Marlette, for appellants.
Lawrence D. Lissauer, for respondents.
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM:
The judgment appealed from and the order of the Appellate Division
brought up for review should be reversed, with costs, and the Labor
Law § 240(1) cause of action dismissed.
This is an action brought pursuant to Labor Law § 240(1).
Plaintiff, an employee of an asbestos removal company, was injured
when a piece of asbestos, which had been cut and deliberately dropped
from a chemical tank approximately 12 feet above ground, fell on him.
Plaintiff and his wife brought this action against General Electric
Company, the owner of the premises, alleging, among other things,
absolute liability under section 240(1) of the Labor Law. Supreme
Court granted partial summary judgment to plaintiffs as to liability
on the section 240(1) cause of action. The Appellate Division
affirmed, with two justices dissenting. Defendant now appeals as of
right to this Court pursuant to CPLR 5601(d) from the ensuing
Supreme Court judgment awarding damages to bring up for review the
prior Appellate Division order.
Here, the asbestos "that fell on plaintiff was not a material being
hoisted or a load that required securing for the purposes of the
undertaking at the time it fell, and thus Labor Law § 240(1) does
not apply. * * * * This was not a situation where a hoisting or
SNIPPETS:
Anthony Roberts et al., Respondents, v.
General Electric Company, Appellant, et al., Defendant, UE&C Catalytic, a Division of
This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York
The judgment appealed from and the order of the Appellate Division brought up for review
Plaintiff, an employee of an asbestos removal company, was injured when a piece of asbestos,
Plaintiff and his wife brought this action against General Electric Company, the owner of the
Defendant now appeals as of right to this Court pursuant to CPLR 5601from the ensuing Supreme
Here, the asbestos "that fell on plaintiff was not a material being hoisted or a load that
* * * * This was not a situation where a hoisting or securing device of the kind enumerated
there was no basis for liability pursuant to Labor Law § 1).
Judges Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley, Rosenblatt and Graffeo concur.
Chief Judge Kaye took no part.
|