LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

IN THE MATTER OF THE SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CourtCode: AP, CourtName: NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS, State: NEW YORK, UniqueCaseRef: NE>AP>I99_0126, Art, Museum, Subpoena Duces Tecum, Cultural Affairs Law, York, Grand Jury, City, Matter, Statute, Seizure, Paintings, Civil, Nazi, Nonresident, Artwork, Bar, Modern Art, Ny2d, Grand Jury Investigation, Exhibition, District Attorney, Committee, Legislature, Legislation, Leopold Foundation, Possession, Art Gallery, Cultural Institutions, United States, Cpl , ContentID: 120251757

Case Documents
1 1999-09-21 OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 125666
17 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 17 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
MUSEUM
SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM
CULTURAL AFFAIRS LAW
YORK
GRAND JURY
CITY
MATTER
STATUTE
SEIZURE
PAINTINGS
CIVIL
NAZI
NONRESIDENT
ARTWORK
BAR
MODERN ART
NY2D
GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION
EXHIBITION
DISTRICT ATTORNEY
COMMITTEE
LEGISLATURE
LEGISLATION
LEOPOLD FOUNDATION
POSSESSION
ART GALLERY
CULTURAL INSTITUTIONS
UNITED STATES
CPL


  IN THE MATTER OF THE GRAND JURY SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM, &C.
  ---------------------------------
  THE PEOPLE &C., RESPONDENT, v. THE MUSEUM OF MODERN ART, APPELLANT.

    93 N.Y.2d 729 (1999).
    September 21, 1999

   1 No. 139 (99 NY Int. 0126)
   Decided September 21, 1999
     _________________________________________________________________

   This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication
   in the New York Reports.
     _________________________________________________________________

   Evan A. Davis, for appellant.
   Mark Dwyer, for respondent.
   Albright-Knox Art Gallery, et al.; Association of the
   Bar of the City of New York, Committee on Art Law; American
   Section, International Association of Jewish Lawyers and Jurists,
   amici curiae.

   WESLEY, J.:

   More than half a century ago, Nazis confiscated Jewish-owned artwork
   throughout Europe. Much of this artwork vanished during the war, but
   ultimately found its way into museums around the world; other pieces
   became part of private collections.

   In this case we must determine whether Arts and Cultural Affairs Law
   section 12.03, which protects the artwork of nonresident lenders from
   "any kind of seizure" while on exhibit in New York State, encompasses
   a subpoena duces tecum requiring production of two paintings by Egon
   Schiele on loan to the Museum of Modern Art in New York from the
   Leopold Foundation in Vienna. The subpoena was issued by the New York
   County District Attorney's office pursuant to a Grand Jury
   investigation into the theft of those paintings during the German
   annexation of Austria. The statute's language and history lead us to
   conclude that the protection of section 12.03 -- which in the past has
   been used in the context of civil actions -- applies under the
   circumstances of this case.

                                     I.

   In October 1997, the Leopold Foundation in Vienna loaned more than 150
   works by Egon Schiele, the renowned Austrian expressionist, to the
SNIPPETS:
  • THE MUSEUM OF MODERN ART,
  • This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York
  • Albright-Knox Art Gallery, et al.; Association of the Bar of the City of New York, Committee
  • Much of this artwork vanished during the war, but ultimately found its way into museums
  • In this case we must determine whether Arts and Cultural Affairs Law section 12.03, which
  • The subpoena was issued by the New York County District Attorney's office pursuant to a Grand
  • The statute's language and history lead us to conclude that the protection of section 12.03
  • "Portrait of Wally" and "Dead City III" were among the paintings exhibited.
  • On December 31, 1997, five days before the exhibition was to close, the Museum received two
  • Bondi inquired as to the requirements for proof of inheritance and ownership, and requested
  • The Reifs also demanded that the Museum turn "Dead City III" over to the them; take no steps
  • The Appellate Division reversed, holding that the statute applied only to civil disputes and
  • While section 12.03 delineates certain types of civil process, the unconditional language
  • The essence of this legislation is perhaps best captured in Governor Rockefeller's Memorandum
  • to insulate nonresident lenders from seizures via legal process and, concomitantly, to
  • The Attorney General's Supplemental Memorandum to the Governor, precipitated by a letter by
  • It is well settled that legislative intent may be inferred from the omission of proposed
  • While this Court has not had occasion to comment upon the meaning of "seizure" in a property
  • a subpoena duces tecum is a process of a court (CPL 610.10(2)).
  • The District Attorney has a constitutional responsibility to identify and prosecute criminal
  •    |