IN THE MATTER OF JAMES J. VERNEY, DOING BUSINESS AS FOLEY'S SQUARE,
RESPONDENT, v. NEW YORK STATE LIQUOR AUTHORITY, APPELLANT.
94 N.Y.2d 779 (1999).
October 19, 1999
3 No. 150
(99 NY Int. 0136)
Decided October 19, 1999
_________________________________________________________________
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication
in the New York Reports.
_________________________________________________________________
Leslie W. Trebby, for appellant.
Bruce D. Blatchly, for respondent.
MEMORANDUM:
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the
determination of the State Liquor Authority reinstated, without costs.
The Administrative Law Judge found a substantial number of conscious
violations over a period of several months, which included noise,
disorder, unlawfully extending the premises, unlawfully exceeding the
premises' occupancy, operating an unlicensed stand-up bar, and a
history of complaints, police calls and official warnings followed by
additional violations. These findings were adopted by the Authority
and were unchallenged in court.
Under the circumstances we cannot say that the non-renewal
determination was arbitrary and capricious or that the penalty imposed
was "so disproportionate to the offense, in light of all the
circumstances, as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness" ( Matter
of Pell v. Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222, 233 (internal quotations
omitted); see also, Matter of Gillen v Smithtown Lib. Bd. of Trustees,
___ NY2d ___ (decided today)).
Order reversed, without costs, determination of the New York State
Liquor Authority reinstated and petition dismissed, in a memorandum.
Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley
and Rosenblatt concur.
Decided October 19, 1999
SNIPPETS:
APPELLANT.
Bruce D. Blatchly, for respondent.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the determination of the State
The Administrative Law Judge found a substantial number of conscious violations over a period
These findings were adopted by the Authority and were unchallenged in court.
Under the circumstances we cannot say that the non-renewal determination was arbitrary and
Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222, 233; see also, Matter of Gillen v Smithtown Lib.
of Trustees,
Order reversed, without costs, determination of the New York State Liquor Authority
Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley and Rosenblatt concur.
|