LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

VERNEY v NEW YORK STATE LIQUOR AUTHORITY Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CourtCode: AP, CourtName: NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS, Plaintiff: VERNEY, State: NEW YORK, UniqueCaseRef: NE>AP>I99_0136, State Liquor Authority, Matter, York State Liquor, Appellant, Determination, Judge, Respondent, Memorandum, Costs, Violations, Premises, Ny2d, Findings, Non-renewal Determination, Disproportionate, Offense, Shocking, Fairness, Pell, Educ, Smithtown Lib, Trustees, Chief Judge Kaye, Judges Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley, Rosenblatt Concur , ContentID: 120251751

Case Documents
1   OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 125660
2 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 2 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
MATTER
YORK STATE LIQUOR
APPELLANT
DETERMINATION
JUDGE
RESPONDENT
MEMORANDUM
COSTS
VIOLATIONS
PREMISES
NY2D
FINDINGS
COURT
NON-RENEWAL DETERMINATION
DISPROPORTIONATE
OFFENSE
SHOCKING
FAIRNESS
PELL
EDUC
SMITHTOWN LIB
TRUSTEES
CHIEF JUDGE KAYE
JUDGES BELLACOSA
SMITH
LEVINE
CIPARICK
WESLEY
ROSENBLATT CONCUR


  IN THE MATTER OF JAMES J. VERNEY, DOING BUSINESS AS FOLEY'S SQUARE,
  RESPONDENT, v. NEW YORK STATE LIQUOR AUTHORITY, APPELLANT.

    94 N.Y.2d 779 (1999).
    October 19, 1999

   3 No. 150

   (99 NY Int. 0136)
   Decided October 19, 1999
     _________________________________________________________________

   This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication
   in the New York Reports.
     _________________________________________________________________

   Leslie W. Trebby, for appellant.
   Bruce D. Blatchly, for respondent.

   MEMORANDUM:

   The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the
   determination of the State Liquor Authority reinstated, without costs.

   The Administrative Law Judge found a substantial number of conscious
   violations over a period of several months, which included noise,
   disorder, unlawfully extending the premises, unlawfully exceeding the
   premises' occupancy, operating an unlicensed stand-up bar, and a
   history of complaints, police calls and official warnings followed by
   additional violations. These findings were adopted by the Authority
   and were unchallenged in court.

   Under the circumstances we cannot say that the non-renewal
   determination was arbitrary and capricious or that the penalty imposed
   was "so disproportionate to the offense, in light of all the
   circumstances, as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness" ( Matter
   of Pell v. Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222, 233 (internal quotations
   omitted); see also, Matter of Gillen v Smithtown Lib. Bd. of Trustees,
   ___ NY2d ___ (decided today)).

   Order reversed, without costs, determination of the New York State
   Liquor Authority reinstated and petition dismissed, in a memorandum.
   Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley
   and Rosenblatt concur.

   Decided October 19, 1999
SNIPPETS:
  • APPELLANT.
  • Bruce D. Blatchly, for respondent.
  • The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the determination of the State
  • The Administrative Law Judge found a substantial number of conscious violations over a period
  • These findings were adopted by the Authority and were unchallenged in court.
  • Under the circumstances we cannot say that the non-renewal determination was arbitrary and
  • Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222, 233; see also, Matter of Gillen v Smithtown Lib.
  • of Trustees,
  • Order reversed, without costs, determination of the New York State Liquor Authority
  • Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley and Rosenblatt concur.
  •    |