![]() |
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
OPINION
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
EDUCATION LAW PRIVATE SCHOOL DISTRICTS PLAINTIFFS LEGISLATURE SCOLIOSIS STATUTE SCREENING INFANT PLAINTIFF PUBLICATION ENFORCEMENT PURPOSE EXAMINATION LIABILITY NY2D CONSISTENT COURT SUPRA PRONG APPELLATE DIVISION COMMON LAW NEGLIGENCE AUTHORIZES PARENTS SCHEME EVIDENCE IMMUNITY COMMISSIONER BILL JACKET COST |
EMILY R. UHR, AN INFANT, &C., ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. EAST GREENBUSH CENTRAL
SCHOOL DISTRICT ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
94 N.Y.2d 32 (1999).
October 21, 1999
3 No. 140
(99 NY Int. 0138)
Decided October 21, 1999
_________________________________________________________________
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication
in the New York Reports.
_________________________________________________________________
Michael W. Kessler, for appellants.
Leslie B. Neustadt, for respondents.
New York State School Boards Association, Inc.,
amicus curiae.
ROSENBLATT, J.:
Education Law § 905(1) requires school authorities in the State of
New York to examine students between eight and sixteen years of age
for scoliosis at least once in each schoolyear. The principal issue on
this appeal is whether the statute authorizes a private right of
action.
During the 1992-1993 school year, the infant plaintiff was a seventh
grade student at the Goff Middle School, operated by defendant East
Greenbush Central School District. In October 1992, as part of a
school program, a nurse screened her for scoliosis. The results were
negative. She was examined during the following school year
(1993-1994) by a school nurse who checked her height, weight and
vision but allegedly did not screen her for scoliosis. (n.1)
In March 1995, when the infant plaintiff was a ninth grader during the
1994-1995 school year at Columbia High School (also operated by the
East Greenbush Central School District), a school nurse screened her
for scoliosis and the examination proved positive. Her parents, who
are also plaintiffs in this action, then had her examined by an
orthopedic doctor who concluded that her scoliosis had progressed to
the point that surgery was required instead of the braces that often
can be utilized when the condition is diagnosed earlier. The infant
plaintiff underwent surgery in July 1995.
SNIPPETS:
|
| | | |