LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

OXENHORN v FLEET TRUST CO Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CourtCode: AP, CourtName: NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS, Plaintiff: OXENHORN, State: NEW YORK, UniqueCaseRef: NE>AP>I99_0148, Medicaid, Trust, Social Services, Paid, Social Services Law, Recover, Correctly Paid, Payments, Eligibility, Decedent, Determination, Trustee, Statutes, Appellate Division, County, Judson, Misrepresentation, Fraud, Supreme Court, Matter, Assistance, Reverse, Death, Incorrectly Paid, Regard, Usc, Ny2d, Overpayment , ContentID: 120251733

Case Documents
1 1999-11-18 OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 125642
5 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 5 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
TRUST
SOCIAL SERVICES
PAID
SOCIAL SERVICES LAW
RECOVER
CORRECTLY PAID
COURT
PAYMENTS
ELIGIBILITY
DECEDENT
DETERMINATION
TRUSTEE
STATUTES
APPELLATE DIVISION
COUNTY
JUDSON
DEFENDANTS
MISREPRESENTATION
FRAUD
SUPREME COURT
MATTER
ASSISTANCE
REVERSE
DEATH
INCORRECTLY PAID
REGARD
USC
NY2D
OVERPAYMENT


    94 N.Y.2d 110 (1999).
    November 18, 1999

   (99 NY Int. 0148)
   Decided November 18, 1999
     _________________________________________________________________

   This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication
   in the New York Reports.
     _________________________________________________________________

   WESLEY, J.:

   WESLEY, J.:

   Plaintiff, Commissioner of the Department of Social Services for
   Columbia County, seeks to recover Medicaid benefits paid to decedent
   Marion F. Judson, the named beneficiary of a self-settled, irrevocable
   trust. The parties acknowledge that had the Department included the
   trust principal in its eligibility determination, decedent would not
   have been eligible for Medicaid benefits. Defendants contend, however,
   that because the Department made an administrative error that was not
   due to misrepresentation or fraud, the benefits should be deemed
   "correctly paid" to decedent within the meaning of Social Services Law
   § 369(2)(b)(i) and are therefore not recoverable. We disagree, reverse
   the order of the Appellate Division andreinstate the order of Supreme
   Court.

                                     I.

   Marion Judson resided in a nursing home from May 1, 1989 until her
   death on December 26, 1995. She initially was admitted as a
   private-pay resident. On May 1, 1991 one of her sons submitted an
   application for Medicaid benefits on her behalf to the Columbia County
   Department of Social Services. The application disclosed that Judson
   was the named beneficiary of a self-settled, irrevocable trust; a copy
   of the trust instrument was provided. The trust instrument stipulated
   that the trustee was to pay decedent the trust income and gave the
   trustee discretion to apply "all or such part of the principal of this
   trust * * * for the support, care and maintenance of (decedent) during
   (her) lifetime." The initial application was denied.

   A second application, submitted on September 4, 1991, also contained
   the trust information. This time, the Department determined that
   Judson was eligible for Medicaid benefits. The Department included the
   trust income in determining her eligibility for Medicaid, but did not
SNIPPETS:
  • The parties acknowledge that had the Department included the trust principal in its
  • Defendants contend, however, that because the Department made an administrative error that
  • reverse the order of the Appellate Division andreinstate the order of Supreme Court.
  • Marion Judson resided in a nursing home from May 1, 1989 until her death on December 26, 1995.
  • 1991 one of her sons submitted an application for Medicaid benefits on her behalf to the
  • The trust instrument stipulated that the trustee was to pay decedent the trust income and
  • The second cause of action against only the co-executors was premised on a theory that they
  • The court granted partial summary judgment to the Department on its third cause of action on
  • The court held that the Medicaid payments were incorrectly paid and relied on SocialServices
  • The court relied on Matter of Akullian to support its determination, reasoning that because
  • The court noted that the regulation in question did not create a right of recovery after an
  • Medicaid is a jointly funded Federal and State program that pays for necessary medical care
  • The Legislature has enacted a series of "recovery statutes" that define the terms under which
  • %Notwithstanding any inconsistent provision of this chapter or other law, no adjustment or
  • %social services official shall * * * take all necessary steps to correct any overpayment * *
  • v City of New York, 71 NY2d 274, 282; Morley v Arricale, 66 NY2d 665, 667).
  •    |