LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

DRAPER v GEORGIA PROPERTIES Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CourtCode: AP, CourtName: NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS, Plaintiff: DRAPER, State: NEW YORK, UniqueCaseRef: NE>AP>I99_0159, Primary Residence, Apartment, Landlord, Summary Judgment, Rent Stabilization, Tenant, Appellant, Discovery, Lease, Prior, Rent Stabilization Law, Support, Correspondence, Bills, Judges, Respondent, Georgia Properties, York, Memorandum, Appellate Division, Review, Statutory, Representation, Housing Accommodation, Nycrr, Prohibitions, City, Private, Submission, Affidavit , ContentID: 120251726

Case Documents
1 1999-11-23 OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 125635
2 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 2 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
APARTMENT
LANDLORD
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
RENT STABILIZATION
TENANT
APPELLANT
DISCOVERY
LEASE
PRIOR
RENT STABILIZATION LAW
SUPPORT
CORRESPONDENCE
BILLS
JUDGES
RESPONDENT
GEORGIA PROPERTIES
YORK
MEMORANDUM
APPELLATE DIVISION
REVIEW
STATUTORY
REPRESENTATION
HOUSING ACCOMMODATION
NYCRR
PROHIBITIONS
CITY
PRIVATE
SUBMISSION
AFFIDAVIT


  PAMELA A. DRAPER, RESPONDENT, v. GEORGIA PROPERTIES, INC., APPELLANT.

    94 N.Y.2d 809 (1999).
    November 23, 1999

   1 No. 190

   (99 NY Int. 0159)
   Decided November 23, 1999
     _________________________________________________________________

   This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication
   in the New York Reports.
     _________________________________________________________________

   Scott E. Mollen, for appellant.
   Peter A. Schwartz, for respondent.

   MEMORANDUM:

   The judgment appealed from and the order of the Appellate Division
   brought up for review should be affirmed, withcosts.

   This is a rent overcharge proceeding in which the plaintiff tenant
   seeks recovery of rents paid in excess of the prior stabilized rate,
   and accompanying statutory damages. The appeal, as of right on a
   two-Justice dissent from the prior nonfinal order, is brought by the
   defendant landlord, Georgia Properties, Inc.

   The landlord argues that the tenant was wrongly awarded summary
   judgment. It complains that it was not given an opportunity to conduct
   discovery concerning the tenant's primary residence status, especially
   since their lease stated that the tenant would not use the apartment
   as her primary residence. The tenant counters that the landlord
   proposed that she had to sign the lease and rider in the form the
   landlord presented to her, which included the false representation
   that the apartment would not be her primary residence.

   Rent Stabilization Code § 2525.3(b) prohibits an owner from requiring
   a prospective tenant "to represent or agree as a condition of renting
   a housing accommodation that the housing accommodation shall not be
   used as the * * * prospective tenant's primary residence" (9 NYCRR
   2525.3(b)). Moreover, Rent Stabilization Code § 2520.13 provides that
   "(a)n agreement by the tenant to waive the benefit of any provision of
   the (Rent Stabilization Law) or this Code is void" (9 NYCRR 2520.13).

SNIPPETS:
  • Scott E. Mollen, for appellant.
  • Peter A. Schwartz, for respondent.
  • The judgment appealed from and the order of the Appellate Division brought up for review
  • This is a rent overcharge proceeding in which the plaintiff tenant seeks recovery of rents
  • The appeal, as of right on a two-Justice dissent from the prior nonfinal order, is brought by
  • It complains that it was not given an opportunity to conduct discovery concerning the
  • The tenant counters that the landlord proposed that she had to sign the lease and rider in
  • Rent Stabilization Code § 2525.3prohibits an owner from requiring a prospective tenant "to
  • Rent Stabilization Code § 2520.13 provides that "n agreement by the tenant to waive the
  • these prohibitions bar a landlord fromsecuring a lease on the condition of a tenant's
  • De-regulation of apartments is otherwise available through regular, officially authorized
  • Here, however, the tenant's submission of evidence as to her use of the apartment as a
  • In particular, the tenant's affidavit in support of her motion for summary judgment stated
  • Attached to the affidavit were copies of correspondence from the landlord directed to her at
  • Judgment appealed from and order of the Appellate Division brought up for review affirmed,
  • Judges Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley and Rosenblatt concur.
  •    |