![]() |
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
OPINION
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
PAYMENT CONTRACTOR WINDSOR BOND GENERAL ACCIDENT STATE FINANCE LAW STATUTE EBERHARD LIMITATIONS PROVISIONS ARBITRATION TERMINATION CONSTRUCTION SURETY BILL APPELLATE DIVISION PURSUANT COURT CLAIMANT DEMAND ASSERTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT SUE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT REPORT CONTROVERSY PRIME CONTRACT ACCORDANCE LABOR |
WINDSOR METAL FABRICATIONS, LTD., RESPONDENT, v. GENERAL ACCIDENT INSURANCE
COMPANY OF AMERICA, APPELLANT.
94 N.Y.2d 124 (1999).
November 30, 1999
2 No. 186
(99 NY Int. 0162)
Decided November 30, 1999
_________________________________________________________________
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication
in the New York Reports.
_________________________________________________________________
Armen Shahinian, for appellant.
Sol Kodsi, for respondent.
General Building Contractors of New York State, Inc.;
Trataros Construction Inc.; Surety Association of America et al.,
amici curiae.
BELLACOSA, J.:
This case presents the puzzle of when the one year limitation period
for suing a surety on a public improvementconstruction bond begins to
run, within the meaning of State Finance Law § 137(4)(b). Also
implicated is whether contractual provisions in a subcontract can
effectively toll the statutory time period.
We conclude that the one year period starts to be counted as of the
time when a subcontractor has demanded final payment from the general
contractor with whom it contracted, and ninety days have passed since
the subcontractor ceased work on the project. This timeframe may not
be extended or overridden by any provisions of the subcontract.
I.
This controversy arises out of a public improvement contract for the
construction of a health care facility at Greenhaven Correctional
Facility. Eberhard Construction Company, general contractor, held the
prime contract with the State of New York. Plaintiff Windsor
subcontracted with Eberhard to provide and erect all structural steel
for the project, at a cost of $404,000.
Defendant General Accident provided the statutory payment bond for the
SNIPPETS:
|
| | | |