LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

RODRIGUEZ v WING Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CourtCode: AP, CourtName: NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS, Plaintiff: RODRIGUEZ, State: NEW YORK, UniqueCaseRef: NE>AP>I99_0170, Social Services, Social Services Law, Assistance, Petitioner, Dss, Shelter, Housing Assistance, Payments, Temporary Housing, Income, Net Assistance, Safety Net Assistance, Receiving, Public Assistance, Cost, Standard, Homeless, Entitlement, Ssi, Appellate Division, Respondent, Federal Disability Benefits, Home Relief, Matter, Commissioner, County, Statutory, Security Income, Temporary Emergency, Resources , ContentID: 120251720

Case Documents
1 1999-12-02 OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 125629
5 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 5 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
SOCIAL SERVICES LAW
ASSISTANCE
PETITIONER
DSS
SHELTER
HOUSING ASSISTANCE
PAYMENTS
TEMPORARY HOUSING
INCOME
NET ASSISTANCE
SAFETY NET ASSISTANCE
RECEIVING
PUBLIC ASSISTANCE
COST
STANDARD
HOMELESS
ENTITLEMENT
SSI
APPELLATE DIVISION
RESPONDENT
FEDERAL DISABILITY BENEFITS
HOME RELIEF
MATTER
COMMISSIONER
COUNTY
STATUTORY
SECURITY INCOME
TEMPORARY EMERGENCY
RESOURCES


  IN THE MATTER OF ELIAS RODRIGUEZ, APPELLANT, v. BRIAN J. WING, &C., ET AL.,
  RESPONDENTS.

    94 N.Y.2d 192 (1999).
    December 2, 1999

   2 No. 187

   (99 NY Int. 0170)
   Decided December 2, 1999
     _________________________________________________________________

   This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication
   in the New York Reports.
     _________________________________________________________________

   Michael D. Hampden, for appellant.
   Mark Gimpel, for respondent State Commissioner.
   Marguerite R. Wiess, for respondent County
   Commissioner.

   LEVINE, J.:

   Respondent Commissioner of the Westchester County Department of Social
   Services (DSS) contracted with a privatenon-profit agency to provide
   shelter for petitioner Elias Rodriguez, a homeless person who is
   permanently disabled by mental illness. As a condition of continued
   receipt of that housing assistance, DSS required petitioner to use a
   portion of his Federal disability benefits to contribute to the cost
   of the shelter. DSS allowed petitioner to retain, out of his Federal
   benefits, a sum equal to the statutory standard of monthly need apart
   from shelter to which petitioner was found to be entitled under Social
   Services Law § 131-a(2). The issue in this case is whether DSS could
   legally require petitioner to assign all but the retained portion of
   Federal benefits as a condition for the continued provision of housing
   assistance by way of direct payments to the residence on petitioner's
   behalf. We agree with Supreme Court and the Appellate Division that it
   can.

   Petitioner began receiving the temporary shelter assistance in 1986.
   DSS paid Westhab, Inc., which operated the New Windham Residence in
   Yonkers, $1,800 per month to house petitioner. While residing at New
   Windham, petitioner began receiving $564 per month in Supplemental
   Security Income (SSI; see, 42 USC § 1382) and Social Security
   Disability (SSD; see, 42 USC § 423) from the Federal government. He
   also received food stamps.
SNIPPETS:
  • Mark Gimpel, for respondent State Commissioner.
  • Marguerite R. Wiess, for respondent County Commissioner.
  • Respondent Commissioner of the Westchester County Department of Social Services (DSS)
  • As a condition of continued receipt of that housing assistance, DSS required petitioner to
  • DSS allowed petitioner to retain, out of his Federal benefits, a sum equal to the statutory
  • The issue in this case is whether DSS could legally require petitioner to assign all but the
  • We agree with Supreme Court and the Appellate Division that it can.
  • Petitioner began receiving the temporary shelter assistance in 1986.
  • While residing at New Windham, petitioner began receiving $564 per month in Supplemental
  • As a threshold matter, DSS argues that this appeal is moot because petitioner is no longer
  • Moreover, it will typically evade review because of the relatively short time period in which
  • the issue is both novel and substantial; it has significance for the administration of
  • The State and County DSS determined that the payments were a form of "safety net assistance"
  • Petitioner's opposing position is premised on the contention that Social Services Law § 131-v
  • Public assistance isrequired to be awarded "less any available income or resources" ).
  • The sponsor's memorandum explained that emergency shelter to the homeless was already being
  •    |