![]() |
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
OPINION
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
ELECTION LAW APPELLATE DIVISION DESIGNATING PETITION BALLOT RESPONDENTS CONSERVATIVE PARTY SIGNATURES INVALID CHEMUNG COUNTY PUBLICATION VOTERS CHRISTOPHER BARTON THOMAS SPARGO MEMORANDUM COSTS SUPPORTERS DISTRICT ATTORNEY CONSERVATIVE NOMINATION FAILURE REQUIRED CERTIFICATE AUTHORIZATION RULING INASMUCH VOTERS SIGNING ELECTED THERETO BALLOT NECESSARILY IMPLIES VOTE |
IN THE MATTER OF LOUIS F. DECICCO ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. CHEMUNG COUNTY
BOARD OF ELECTIONS, RESPONDENT, AND DANIEL J. CHAPMAN, ET AL., APPELLANTS.
93 N.Y.2d 1008 (1999).
August 25, 1999
3 No. 157
(99 NY Int. 0122)
Decided August 25, 1999
_________________________________________________________________
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication
in the New York Reports.
_________________________________________________________________
Christopher A. Barton, for appellants.
Thomas J. Spargo, for respondents.
MEMORANDUM:
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed,
without costs.
In this case supporters of John Trice simultaneouslycirculated a
petition designating him as Conservative Party candidate for District
Attorney of Chemung County and a petition for an opportunity to ballot
for the Conservative nomination for that office. Both petitions
contained the same signatures and were executed on the same date. The
designating petition was invalidated for failure to receive the
required certificate of authorization from the Conservative Party (
see, Election Law § 6-120(3)).
The Appellate Division was correct in ruling that the petition for an
opportunity to ballot was also invalid under Election Law
6-134(3) inasmuch as all of the voters signing that petition had also
signed the designating petition on the same date.
Election Law § 6-134(3) provides that if on the same date a voter
signs "any petition or petitions designating a greater number of
candidates for public office * * * than the number of persons to be
elected thereto (the voter's signatures) * * * shall not be counted."
As it is clear that the opportunity to ballot necessarily implies a
vote in the primary for someone other than the person named in the
designating petition ( see, Election Law § 8-308(2)), the Appellate
SNIPPETS:
|
| | | |