LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

THE MENTAL HYGIENE LEGAL SERVICE ON BEHALF OF ALIZA K. v FORD Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CourtCode: AP, CourtName: NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS, Plaintiff: THE MENTAL HYGIENE LEGAL SERVICE ON BEHALF OF ALIZA K., State: NEW YORK, UniqueCaseRef: NE>AP>I98_0159, Patient, Aliza, Facility, Nycrr, Medication, Mpc, Judicial Hearing, Hospitals, Secure, Omh, Kirby, Security, Appellate Division, Treatment, Savastano, Staff, Prior, Mental Hygiene, Protection, Mental Hygiene Law, Commissioner, Regulations, Commitment, Proceeding, Reason, Judgement, Risk, Nurnberg, Professionals , ContentID: 120251686

Case Documents
1 1998-12-03 OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 125595
7 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 7 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
ALIZA
FACILITY
NYCRR
MEDICATION
MPC
JUDICIAL HEARING
HOSPITALS
SECURE
OMH
KIRBY
COURT
SECURITY
APPELLATE DIVISION
TREATMENT
SAVASTANO
STAFF
PRIOR
MENTAL HYGIENE
PROTECTION
MENTAL HYGIENE LAW
COMMISSIONER
REGULATIONS
COMMITMENT
PROCEEDING
REASON
JUDGEMENT
RISK
NURNBERG
PROFESSIONALS


  THE MENTAL HYGIENE LEGAL SERVICE ON BEHALF OF ALIZA K., RESPONDENT, v.
  MICHAEL FORD, M.D., &C., APPELLANT.

    92 N.Y.2d 500, 705 N.E.2d 1191, 683 N.Y.S.2d 150 (1998).
    December 3, 1998

   1 No. 150

   (98 NY Int. 0159)
   Decided December 3, 1998
     _________________________________________________________________

   This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication
   in the New York Reports.
     _________________________________________________________________

   Thomas D. Hughes, for appellant.
   Karen Gomes Andreasian, for respondent.

   LEVINE, J.:

   Aliza K. is an involuntarily committed civil patient hospitalized at
   Manhattan Psychiatric Center (MPC), a civil mental health facility of
   the State Office of Mental Health(OMH). She was charged with
   aggravated harassment after having already served two sentences for
   stalking, threatening and harassing her former employer (with whom she
   apparently at one time had a romantic involvement) and the staff of
   his business. The new charges were dismissed after she was found unfit
   to proceed to trial. Aliza K. was then transferred from the criminal
   detention facility at Riker's Island pursuant to Criminal Procedure
   Law § 730.40. On March 14, 1994, she was admitted into MPC pursuant to
   Mental Hygiene Law § 9.33. She was diagnosed as suffering from an
   erotomanic delusional disorder, which caused her to believe that her
   former employer still loved her and to compulsively seek contact with
   him. The employer had to obtain an order of protection against her,
   and despite the order, at MPC Aliza K. repeatedly stated that she
   would never stop pursuing him. Following some physical altercations
   with hospital staff, she was transferred to the Intensive Psychiatric
   Service unit of MPC, a locked ward which is reserved for the most
   violent patients.

   On May 3, 1995, MPC requested that Aliza K. be transferred to Kirby
   Forensic Psychiatric Center (Kirby), one of the two secure OMH
   facilities in the State ( see, 14 NYCRR 57.1). Aliza K.%s treating
   psychiatrist prepared a clinical summary giving the medical reasons
   for the transfer application. According to that summary, Aliza K. had
SNIPPETS:
  • Aliza K. is an involuntarily committed civil patient hospitalized at Manhattan Psychiatric
  • She was charged with aggravated harassment after having already served two sentences for
  • On March 14, 1994, she was admitted into MPC pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law § 9.33.
  • On May 3, 1995, MPC requested that Aliza K. be transferred to Kirby Forensic Psychiatric
  • On May 5, 1995, the OMH Commissioner authorized the transfer to Kirby and, as required by 14
  • On May 10, 1995, Aliza K. commenced this proceeding byserving MPC with a writ of habeas
  • Supreme Court converted the proceeding into a declaratory judgment action and consolidated
  • The court, after enjoining the transfer, granted her motion for summary judgment on both due
  • The Appellate Division rejected petitioner's equal protection argument but agreed on due
  • The Appellate Division concluded that since the primary motivation for the transfer was not a
  • That statute and its implementing regulations require frequent periodic review of a patient's
  • Under those regulations, the director of the transferring hospital is required to submit a
  • Also, because a high percentage of the patients at Kirby aretransferred from the criminal
  • In Savastano v Nurnberg, the Court reviewed the regulatory criteria for a transfer under 14
  • Whether security concerns also play a role in the transfer decision is irrelevant since "such
  • Patients whose behavior is such as to raise the likelihood of their causing harm to others
  • Here, as in Savastano, we conclude that shifting from mental health professionals to judges
  • As the Supreme Court has noted, "ommon human experience and scholarly opinions suggest that
  • As already noted, the report of the treating psychiatrist in support of the transfer
  •    |