LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

STRINGFELLOWS OF NEW YORK, LTD. v THE CITY OF NEW YORK Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CourtCode: AP, CourtName: NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS, Plaintiff: STRINGFELLOWS OF NEW YORK, LTD., State: NEW YORK, UniqueCaseRef: NE>AP>I98_0014, City, Adult, York, Districts, Adult Establishments, Times Square, Times Square Business, Intervenors-respondents, Amendments, Zoning, Adult Businesses, Amsterdam Video, State Constitution, Supra, Respondents, Secondary Effects, Ny2d, Square Business Improvement, Dcp, Playtime Theatres, City Council, Negative Secondary Effects, Free Expression, Cpc, Residential Development, Amended Zoning Resolution, Provisions , ContentID: 120251685

Case Documents
1 1998-02-24 OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 125594
15 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 15 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
ADULT
YORK
DISTRICTS
ADULT ESTABLISHMENTS
TIMES SQUARE
TIMES SQUARE BUSINESS
INTERVENORS-RESPONDENTS
AMENDMENTS
ZONING
ADULT BUSINESSES
COURT
PLAINTIFFS
AMSTERDAM VIDEO
STATE CONSTITUTION
SUPRA
RESPONDENTS
SECONDARY EFFECTS
NY2D
SQUARE BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT
DCP
PLAYTIME THEATRES
CITY COUNCIL
DEFENDANTS
NEGATIVE SECONDARY EFFECTS
FREE EXPRESSION
CPC
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
AMENDED ZONING RESOLUTION
PROVISIONS


  STRINGFELLOW'S OF NEW YORK, LTD., APPELLANT, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK, ET AL.,
  RESPONDENTS, TIMES SQUARE BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, ET AL.,
  INTERVENORS-RESPONDENTS.

    91 N.Y.2d 382, 694 N.E.2d 407, 671 N.Y.S.2d 406 (1998).
    February 24, 1998

   1 No. 17

   (98 NY Int. 0014)
   Decided February 24, 1998
     _________________________________________________________________

  AMSTERDAM VIDEO INC., ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK, ET AL.,
  RESPONDENTS, TIMES SQUARE BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, ET AL.,
  INTERVENORS-RESPONDENTS.

    91 N.Y.2d 382, 694 N.E.2d 407, 671 N.Y.S.2d 406 (1998).
    February 24, 1998

   1 No. 18

   (98 NY Int. 0014)
   Decided February 24, 1998
     _________________________________________________________________

  RACHEL HICKERSON, ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK, ET AL.,
  RESPONDENTS, TIMES SQUARE BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, ET AL.,
  INTERVENORS-RESPONDENTS.

    91 N.Y.2d 382, 694 N.E.2d 407, 671 N.Y.S.2d 406 (1998).
    February 24, 1998

   1 No. 19

   (98 NY Int. 0014)
   Decided February 24, 1998
     _________________________________________________________________

   This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication
   in the New York Reports.
     _________________________________________________________________

   No. 17:
   Mark J. Alonso, for appellant Stringfellow's.
   Leonard Koerner, for City respondents.
SNIPPETS:
  • STRINGFELLOW'S OF NEW YORK, LTD., APPELLANT, v.
  • THE CITY OF NEW YORK, ET AL.,
  • RESPONDENTS, TIMES SQUARE BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, ET AL., INTERVENORS-RESPONDENTS.
  • for appellant Amsterdam Video.
  • This appeal concerns the validity of New York City's Amended Zoning Regulation governing the
  • We conclude that on this record the Supreme Court correctly granted summary judgment
  • By 1993, there were 177 adult establishments operating in New York City: 107 in Manhattan, 44
  • the Department of City Planning (DCP) undertook an evaluation of the impact of such property
  • The DCP found evidence in these reports that adult businesses often have such negative
  • The DCP also sought to identify the specific adverse secondary effects caused by adult
  • Among the other materials examined were a 1977 report by the City Planning Commission (CPC); e to City agencies.
  • Consequently, adult uses were permitted in most of the City's commercial and manufacturing
  • On March 21, 1995, the DCP and the City Council Land Use Committee jointly sought to amend
  • Over the next several months, the City's 59 community boards, five borough boards and borough
  • As adopted by the City Council, the amendments are applicable to any "adult establishment,"
  • Under provisions that pre date the Amendments, new commercial establishments, including new
  • Plaintiffs alleged that the Amended Zoning Resolution deprived them of their right to free
  • Defendants removed the case to the United States District Court for the Southern District of
  • Applying the test articulated by this Court in Matter of Town of Islip v Caviglia (73 NY2d
  • In this State, the proper balance between community needs and free expression under our
  • We concluded that the ordinance satisfied both federal constitutional standards (see, City of
  • Before enacting the Resolution, the City Council assembled an extensive legislative record
  •    |