LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

PEOPLE v SHAW Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CourtCode: AP, CourtName: NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS, Plaintiff: PEOPLE, State: NEW YORK, UniqueCaseRef: NE>AP>090_0879, Appellant, Memorandum, Judge, Respondent, Judgement, George Shaw, Int, Publication, York Reports, Kimberlianne Podlas, Richard Nahas, Appellate Division, Conviction, Guilty Plea, Imposition, Since-amended Cpl, Extant Penal Law, Discretion, Failure, Nisi Prius, Chief Judge Kaye, Judges Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley Concur , ContentID: 120251470

Case Documents
1 1997-07-02 OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 125379
1 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 1 page.    CAUTION.    PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS IS A ONE PAGE CASE.
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
MEMORANDUM
COURT
JUDGE
RESPONDENT
JUDGEMENT
GEORGE SHAW
INT
PUBLICATION
YORK REPORTS
KIMBERLIANNE PODLAS
RICHARD NAHAS
APPELLATE DIVISION
CONVICTION
GUILTY PLEA
IMPOSITION
SINCE-AMENDED CPL
EXTANT PENAL LAW
DISCRETION
FAILURE
NISI PRIUS
CHIEF JUDGE KAYE
JUDGES TITONE
BELLACOSA
SMITH
LEVINE
CIPARICK
WESLEY CONCUR


  THE PEOPLE &C., RESPONDENT, v. GEORGE SHAW, APPELLANT.

    90 N.Y.2d 879, 684 N.E.2d 273, 661 N.Y.S.2d 824 (1997).
    July 2, 1997

   1 No. 145 (1997 NY Int. 141)
   Decided July 2, 1997
     _________________________________________________________________

   This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before
   publication in the New York Reports.
   Kimberlianne Podlas, for appellant.
   Richard Nahas, for respondent.

   MEMORANDUM:

   The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

   That court affirmed a judgment of conviction on a guilty plea and a
   Judge of this Court granted leave to appeal. The only issue relates to
   the imposition, expressly, in the judgment of the statutory surcharge
   applicable under since-amended CPL 420.35(2) and still extant Penal
   Law §60.35(1). The record demonstrates that defendant's argument, that
   the trial court failed or even improperly exercised any discretion it
   may have had, is unpreserved for failure to be raised at nisi prius.

   * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

   Order affirmed, in a memorandum. Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Titone,
   Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick and Wesley concur.

   Decided July 2, 1997
SNIPPETS:
  • THE PEOPLE &C., RESPONDENT, v. GEORGE SHAW, APPELLANT.
  • No. 145 (1997 NY Int.
  • This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York
  • Kimberlianne Podlas, for appellant.
  • Richard Nahas, for respondent.
  • The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
  • That court affirmed a judgment of conviction on a guilty plea and a Judge of this Court
  • The only issue relates to the imposition, expressly, in the judgment of the statutory
  • The record demonstrates that defendant's argument, that the trial court failed or even
  • Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick and Wesley concur.
  •    |