LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

PEOPLE v KELLAR Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CourtCode: AP, CourtName: NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS, Plaintiff: PEOPLE, State: NEW YORK, UniqueCaseRef: NE>AP>089_0948, Appeals, Appellate Division, Cpl, Dismiss, Memorandum, Judge, Respondent, County, Casey, Bruce, Knoll, Order Denying, Motion Pursuant, Legislature Enacted Cpl, Provision, Orders Emanating, Applications, Relief, Prescribed Authorizations, Division Order Lies, Third Department, Directions, Chief Judge Kaye, Judges Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Ciparick, Wesley Concur, Judge Levine , ContentID: 120251446

Case Documents
1 1997-02-06 OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 125355
1 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 1 page.    CAUTION.    PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS IS A ONE PAGE CASE.
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
APPELLATE DIVISION
CPL
DISMISS
COURT
MEMORANDUM
JUDGE
RESPONDENT
COUNTY
CASEY
BRUCE
KNOLL
ORDER DENYING
MOTION PURSUANT
LEGISLATURE ENACTED CPL
PROVISION
ORDERS EMANATING
APPLICATIONS
RELIEF
PRESCRIBED AUTHORIZATIONS
DIVISION ORDER LIES
THIRD DEPARTMENT
DIRECTIONS
CHIEF JUDGE KAYE
JUDGES TITONE
BELLACOSA
SMITH
CIPARICK
WESLEY CONCUR
JUDGE LEVINE


  THE PEOPLE & C., RESPONDENT, v. RAE T. KELLAR, APPELLANT.

    89 N.Y.2d 948, 678 N.E.2d 464, 655 N.Y.S.2d 852 (1997).
    February 6, 1997

   3 No. 5 (1997 NY Int. 7)
   Decided February 6, 1997
     _________________________________________________________________

   This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before
   publication in the New York Reports.

    John T. Casey, Jr., for Appellant.
   Bruce E. Knoll, for Respondent.

   MEMORANDUM:

   Defendant's appeal should be dismissed, and the matter remitted to the
   Appellate Division for dismissal of defendant's appeal to that court.

   County Court's order denying defendant's motion pursuant to CPL
   440.30(1-a) is not appealable to the Appellate Division as of right
   (see, CPL 450.10), and an appeal of such an order to the Appellate
   Division is not available under CPL 450.15. When the Legislature
   enacted CPL 440.30(1-a) in 1994, it made no provision for appeal of
   orders emanating from applications for relief under that remedial
   section, nor did it add to the list of prescribed authorizations for
   appeals under CPL 450.10 or 450.15. Because the County Court order is
   not appealable to the Appellate Division, no appeal from the Appellate
   Division order lies in this Court (see, CPL 450.90).

   * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

   Appeal dismissed and case remitted to the Appellate Division, Third
   Department, with directions to dismiss the appeal to that court, in a
   memorandum. Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Titone, Bellacosa, Smith,
   Ciparick and Wesley concur. Judge Levine took no part.

   Decided February 6, 1997
SNIPPETS:
  • This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York
  • John T. Casey, Jr., for Appellant.
  • Bruce E. Knoll, for Respondent.
  • County Court's order denying defendant's motion pursuant to CPL 440.30is not appealable to
  • When the Legislature enacted CPL 440.30in 1994, it made no provision for appeal of orders
  • Because the County Court order is not appealable to the Appellate Division, no appeal from
  • Appeal dismissed and case remitted to the Appellate Division, Third Department, with
  • Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Ciparick and Wesley concur.
  • Judge Levine took no part.
  •    |