LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

PEOPLE v FUNCHES Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CourtCode: AP, CourtName: NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS, Plaintiff: PEOPLE, State: NEW YORK, UniqueCaseRef: NE>AP>089_1005, Fire Escape, Calderin, Apartment, Window, Officer, Second Floor, Report, Dispute, Drugs, Appellant, Memorandum, Radio Report, Scene, Handgun, Reasonable Suspicion, Discovery, Loaded Handgun, Judge, Respondent, Occupants, Descent, Landing, Uncurtained Window, Plain, Mirror, Vials, Photographs, Contraband, Drug Paraphernalia , ContentID: 120251440

Case Documents
1 1997-03-27 OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 125349
2 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 2 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
CALDERIN
APARTMENT
WINDOW
OFFICER
DEFENDANT
SECOND FLOOR
REPORT
DISPUTE
DRUGS
APPELLANT
MEMORANDUM
RADIO REPORT
SCENE
HANDGUN
REASONABLE SUSPICION
DISCOVERY
LOADED HANDGUN
JUDGE
RESPONDENT
OCCUPANTS
DESCENT
LANDING
UNCURTAINED WINDOW
PLAIN
MIRROR
VIALS
PHOTOGRAPHS
CONTRABAND
DRUG PARAPHERNALIA


  PEOPLE, & C., RESPONDENT, v. TREVIS FUCHES, A/K/A ERIC WILLIAMS, APPELLANT.

    89 N.Y.2d 1005, 679 N.E.2d 635, 657 N.Y.S.2d 396 (1997).
    March 27, 1997

   1 No. 51 (1997 NY Int. 48)
   Decided March 27, 1997
     _________________________________________________________________

   This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before
   publication in the New York Reports.

   Pamela Peters, for Appellant.
   Tami J. Aisenson, for Respondent.

   MEMORANDUM:

   The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

   On March 25, 1990, Officer Calderin and his partner received a radio
   transmission that two males were involved in a dispute, possibly about
   drugs, in a second floor apartment at 174 West 141st Street in
   Manhattan. As Calderin arrived at the specified building, he observed
   defendant, whom he recognized as a resident from prior encounters,
   climb out of a second story window and onto the fire escape. Calderin
   then heard a metallic noise of an object hitting the fire escape just
   before defendant began climbing up.

   Calderin informed the other officers at the scene of what he had seen
   and then obtained permission to access the fire escape from the
   occupants of the third floor apartment situated above the window from
   which defendant had emerged. When Calderin descended to the second
   floor landing of the fire escape, he observed a .22 caliber handgun
   outside a window of the second floor apartment. The gun contained six
   rounds of live ammunition.

   Calderin then looked through the open, uncurtained window and
   observed, in plain view, a white powder-like substance, later
   identified as cocaine, on a mirror, in plastic bags and in vials. He
   also observed empty vials and two scales. Accompanied by another
   officer, Calderin entered the apartment through the open window to
   search for armed individuals since at least two disputants had been
   reported. As the officers moved through the premises, they noted that
   the television and the videocassette recorder were on, signaling
   potential occupants, and Calderin noticed photographs of the defendant
   and his girlfriend taped to a mirror. The photographs, contraband and
SNIPPETS:
  • This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York
  • Pamela Peters, for Appellant.
  • Tami J. Aisenson, for Respondent.
  • On March 25, 1990, Officer Calderin and his partner received a radio transmission that two
  • As Calderin arrived at the specified building, he observed defendant, whom he recognized as a
  • Calderin informed the other officers at the scene of what he had seen and then obtained
  • When Calderin descended to the second floor landing of the fire escape, he observed a .22
  • He also observed empty vials and two scales.
  • As the officers moved through the premises, they noted that the television and the
  • The record supports the finding of the trial court that Officer Calderin had reasonable
  • Given defendant's lack of exclusive control over the use of the fire escape and the trial
  • The record further supports the finding that the officer had reason to make an investigation
  • Given the discovery of the loaded handgun and the radio report of two men involved in a
  • Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick and Wesley concur.
  •    |