![]() |
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
OPINION
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
MEMORANDUM RESPONDENT JUDGE DONALD CALLENDAR INT PUBLICATION YORK REPORTS SETH LIEBERMAN ANDREA HIRSCH APPELLATE DIVISION SOLE PREJUDICE STANDARD ERROR RULE CPL MOTIONS WILLIAM MACHADO RAISE HEARING COURT REVIEW CHIEF JUDGE KAYE JUDGES TITONE BELLACOSA SMITH LEVINE CIPARICK WESLEY CONCUR |
PEOPLE & C., APPELLANT, v. DONALD CALLENDAR, RESPONDENT.
90 N.Y.2d 831, 683 N.E.2d 332, 660 N.Y.S.2d 710 (1997).
June 10, 1997
2 No. 116 (1997 NY Int. 103)
Decided June 10, 1997
_________________________________________________________________
This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before
publication in the New York Reports.
Seth M. Lieberman, for appellant.
Andrea G. Hirsch, for respondent.
MEMORANDUM:
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
The People's sole argument is that a prejudice standard, rather than
the per se error rule, should apply to Rosario violations raised by
CPL 440.10 motions made before defendant's direct appeal is concluded
(see also, People v William Machado, No. 117 (decided today)).
Having failed to raise this specific issue before the hearing court,
the People have not preserved their claim for our review.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Order affirmed, in a memorandum. Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Titone,
Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick and Wesley concur.
Decided June 10, 1997
SNIPPETS:
|
| | | |