LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

PEOPLE v CALLENDAR Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CourtCode: AP, CourtName: NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS, Plaintiff: PEOPLE, State: NEW YORK, UniqueCaseRef: NE>AP>090_0831, Appellant, Memorandum, Respondent, Judge, Donald Callendar, Int, Publication, York Reports, Seth, Lieberman, Andrea, Hirsch, Appellate Division, Sole, Prejudice Standard, Error Rule, Cpl, Motions, William Machado, Raise, Hearing Court, Review, Chief Judge Kaye, Judges Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley Concur , ContentID: 120251424

Case Documents
1 1997-06-10 OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 125333
1 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 1 page.    CAUTION.    PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS IS A ONE PAGE CASE.
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
MEMORANDUM
RESPONDENT
JUDGE
DONALD CALLENDAR
INT
PUBLICATION
YORK REPORTS
SETH
LIEBERMAN
ANDREA
HIRSCH
APPELLATE DIVISION
SOLE
PREJUDICE STANDARD
ERROR RULE
CPL
MOTIONS
WILLIAM MACHADO
RAISE
HEARING COURT
REVIEW
CHIEF JUDGE KAYE
JUDGES TITONE
BELLACOSA
SMITH
LEVINE
CIPARICK
WESLEY CONCUR


  PEOPLE & C., APPELLANT, v. DONALD CALLENDAR, RESPONDENT.

    90 N.Y.2d 831, 683 N.E.2d 332, 660 N.Y.S.2d 710 (1997).
    June 10, 1997

   2 No. 116 (1997 NY Int. 103)
   Decided June 10, 1997
     _________________________________________________________________

   This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before
   publication in the New York Reports.
   Seth M. Lieberman, for appellant.
   Andrea G. Hirsch, for respondent.

   MEMORANDUM:

   The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

   The People's sole argument is that a prejudice standard, rather than
   the per se error rule, should apply to Rosario violations raised by
   CPL 440.10 motions made before defendant's direct appeal is concluded
   (see also, People v William Machado, No. 117 (decided today)).
   Having failed to raise this specific issue before the hearing court,
   the People have not preserved their claim for our review.

   * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

   Order affirmed, in a memorandum. Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Titone,
   Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick and Wesley concur.

   Decided June 10, 1997

SNIPPETS:
  • PEOPLE & C., APPELLANT, v. DONALD CALLENDAR, RESPONDENT.
  • No. 116 (1997 NY Int.
  • This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York
  • Seth M. Lieberman, for appellant.
  • Andrea G. Hirsch, for respondent.
  • The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
  • The People's sole argument is that a prejudice standard, rather than the per se error rule,
  • Having failed to raise this specific issue before the hearing court, the People have not
  • Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick and Wesley concur.
  •    |