LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

PEOPLE v BOND Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CourtCode: AP, CourtName: NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS, Plaintiff: PEOPLE, State: NEW YORK, UniqueCaseRef: NE>AP>090_0877, Appellant, Respondent, Memorandum, Store, Defense, Justification, Second-degree, Murder, Weapon, Rifle, Standing, Pearsol, Instruction, Judge, Jury, Defendant Argues, Deadly Physical Force, Objection, Contention, Propriety, Consecutive Sentences, Meritless, Chief Judge Kaye, Judges Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley Concur , ContentID: 120251419

Case Documents
1 1997-07-02 OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 125328
1 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 1 page.    CAUTION.    PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS IS A ONE PAGE CASE.
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DEFENDANT
RESPONDENT
MEMORANDUM
STORE
DEFENSE
JUSTIFICATION
SECOND-DEGREE
MURDER
WEAPON
RIFLE
STANDING
PEARSOL
INSTRUCTION
JUDGE
JURY
DEFENDANT ARGUES
DEADLY PHYSICAL FORCE
OBJECTION
CONTENTION
PROPRIETY
CONSECUTIVE SENTENCES
MERITLESS
CHIEF JUDGE KAYE
JUDGES TITONE
BELLACOSA
SMITH
LEVINE
CIPARICK
WESLEY CONCUR


  THE PEOPLE &C., RESPONDENT, v. RICHARD BOND, APPELLANT.

    90 N.Y.2d 877, 684 N.E.2d 273, 661 N.Y.S.2d 824 (1997).
    July 2, 1997

   2 No. 144 (1997 NY Int. 140)
   Decided July 2, 1997
     _________________________________________________________________

   This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before
   publication in the New York Reports.
   Nancy E. Little, for appellant.
   Young C. Lee, for respondent.

   MEMORANDUM:

   The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

   Defendant was charged with second-degree murder, first-degree reckless
   endangerment and second-degree criminal possession of a weapon in
   connection with an incident in which he fired a volley of rifle shots
   at a group of people who were standing in front of a grocery store.
   The murder count arose out of the death of an innocent bystander,
   Lloyd Pearsol, who was fatally injured by a stray bullet while
   standing inside the store. Defendant claimed that he had fired his
   rifle when he saw several individuals in the group outside the store
   gesture as if to draw their own weapons. In response to a request from
   both sides, the court charged the jury on the defense of
   justification.

   On this appeal, defendant argues that the trial court's instruction
   was erroneous because it indicated that the justification defense was
   available only if defendant reasonably believed that Pearsol was about
   to use deadly physical force against him. However, defense counsel's
   brief objection at trial to the court's justification instruction was
   not sufficient to preserve defendant's present appellate claim. We
   have examined defendant's remaining contention about the propriety of
   his consecutive sentences and have found that claim to be meritless.

   * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

   Order affirmed, in a memorandum. Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Titone,
   Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick and Wesley concur.

   Decided July 2, 1997
SNIPPETS:
  • THE PEOPLE &C., RESPONDENT, v. RICHARD BOND, APPELLANT.
  • This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York
  • Defendant was charged with second-degree murder, first-degree reckless endangerment and
  • The murder count arose out of the death of an innocent bystander, Lloyd Pearsol, who was
  • In response to a request from both sides, the court charged the jury on the defense of
  • defendant argues that the trial court's instruction was erroneous because it indicated that
  • defense counsel's brief objection at trial to the court's justification instruction was not
  • We have examined defendant's remaining contention about the propriety of his consecutive
  • Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick and Wesley concur.
  •    |