LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

MATTER OF ARBITRATION BETWEEN PROFESSIONAL, CLERICAL, TECHNICAL EMPLOYEES ASSN and BUFFALO BD. OF E Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CourtCode: AP, CourtName: NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS, State: NEW YORK, UniqueCaseRef: NE>AP>090_0364, Public Policy, Civil Service, Matter, Agreement, Award, Civil Service Law, Unit Member, Appointing Authority, Discretion, Candidates, Arbitration, Employees, Collective Bargaining, Education, Ny2d, Buffalo Board, Parties, Employees Association, Respondent, Highest-scoring, Pctea, Cba, Civil Service Appointments, Arbitrator, City School, Teachers Assn, Competitive Examination, Employment, Probationary Term, Constitution , ContentID: 120251383

Case Documents
1 1997-05-08 OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 125292
9 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 9 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
CIVIL SERVICE
MATTER
AGREEMENT
AWARD
CIVIL SERVICE LAW
UNIT MEMBER
APPOINTING AUTHORITY
DISCRETION
CANDIDATES
ARBITRATION
EMPLOYEES
COLLECTIVE BARGAINING
EDUCATION
NY2D
BUFFALO BOARD
PARTIES
EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION
RESPONDENT
HIGHEST-SCORING
PCTEA
CBA
CIVIL SERVICE APPOINTMENTS
ARBITRATOR
CITY SCHOOL
TEACHERS ASSN
COMPETITIVE EXAMINATION
EMPLOYMENT
PROBATIONARY TERM
CONSTITUTION


  IN  THE MATTER OF THE ARBITRATION BETWEEN  PROFESSIONAL, CLERICAL, TECHNICAL
  EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION,   APPELLANT, AND BUFFALO BOARD OF EDUCATION,
  RESPONDENT. (Two Cases)

    90 N.Y.2d 364, 683 N.E.2d 733, 660 N.Y.S.2d 827 (1997).
    May 8, 1997

   4 No.64, 65 (1997 NY Int. 75)
   Decided May 8, 1997
     _________________________________________________________________

   This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication
   in the New York Reports.

   Nos. 64 and 65:
   Paul D. Weiss, for Appellant.
   James L. Jarvis, Jr., for Respondent.

   TITONE, J.:

   The issue presented in these two appeals is whether an arbitrator's
   award requiring defendant Buffalo Board of Education to promote the
   highest-scoring bargaining unit member on a civil service eligible
   list as required by the terms of the parties' collective bargaining
   agreement is void as violative of public policy in that it restricts
   the statutory discretion vested in the appointing authority under
   Civil Service Law § 61 to select one of the three highest-ranked
   candidates on an eligible list. We conclude that no strong public
   policy prohibits an appointing authority from agreeing through
   collective negotiations to give promotional preference to certain
   members of an eligible list where a probationary period precedes their
   permanent appointment.

   PCTEA I

   Respondent Board of Education for the Buffalo City School District and
   the Professional, Clerical, Technical Employees Association (PCTEA)1**
   are parties to a collective bargaining agreement (CBA) covering the
   terms and conditions of employment of unit members effective July 1,
   1991 through June 30, 1996. The CBA provides for the resolution of any
   "dispute which may arise between the parties involving the
   application, meaning or interpretation of the (CBA)" through a
   progressive grievance procedure which culminates in arbitration.

   On October 5, 1994, the Buffalo Municipal Service Commission adopted a
   list indicating the existence of three vacancies for the promotional
SNIPPETS:
  • James L. Jarvis, Jr., for Respondent.
  • The issue presented in these two appeals is whether an arbitrator's award requiring defendant ble list.
  • Respondent Board of Education for the Buffalo City School District and the Professional,
  • The CBA provides for the resolution of any "dispute which may arise between the parties
  • The highest-scoring candidate on the promotional eligible list for that position was Melvin
  • The matter proceeded to arbitration.
  • The Arbitrator ruled that the Board violated Article 22, § 1 and Article 36 of the CBA when
  • Citing Economico v Village of Pelham (50 NY2d 120, 129), the court ruled that a public
  • A motion to stay arbitration on public policy grounds would be appropriately sought "where
  • Turning to the merits of the Board's challenge to the arbitration award, we conclude that
  • Our State Constitution mandates that civil service appointments and promotions "shall be made
  • The competitive examination scheme "serves as the foundation of the merit system".
  • Thus, the probationary term provides the Board with "sufficient time to determine
  •    |