LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

LUCK v FISK Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CourtCode: AP, CourtName: NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS, Plaintiff: LUCK, State: NEW YORK, UniqueCaseRef: NE>AP>090_0979, Appellant, Memorandum, Affirmance, Elections, Respondents, Appellate Division, Costs, Judge, York Reports, Thomas, Spargo, Michael, Lynch, Affirmance Implies, Election Law, Central Board, Inspectors, Discretion, Ballot Envelopes, Votes, Set Aside Period, Review, Submissions Pursuant, Chief Judge Kaye, Judges Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley Concur , ContentID: 120251378

Case Documents
1 1997-10-22 OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 125287
1 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 1 page.    CAUTION.    PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS IS A ONE PAGE CASE.
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
MEMORANDUM
AFFIRMANCE
ELECTIONS
RESPONDENTS
APPELLATE DIVISION
COSTS
JUDGE
YORK REPORTS
THOMAS
SPARGO
MICHAEL
LYNCH
AFFIRMANCE IMPLIES
ELECTION LAW
CENTRAL BOARD
INSPECTORS
DISCRETION
BALLOT ENVELOPES
VOTES
SET ASIDE PERIOD
REVIEW
SUBMISSIONS PURSUANT
CHIEF JUDGE KAYE
JUDGES TITONE
BELLACOSA
SMITH
LEVINE
CIPARICK
WESLEY CONCUR


  IN THE MATTER OF RICHARD W. LUCK, SR., AS CHAIRMAN OF THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY
  OF THE TOWN OF COEYMANS, APPELLANT, v. ROBERT H. FISK, JR., ET AL., AND
  ALBANY COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, ET AL., RESPONDENTS.

    90 N.Y.2d 979, 688 N.E.2d 1035, 665 N.Y.S.2d 953 (1997).
    October 22, 1997

   3 No. 265 SSM 19

    (97 NY Int. 0169)
   Decided October 22, 1997
     _________________________________________________________________

   This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication
   in the New York Reports.
     _________________________________________________________________

   Submitted by Thomas J. Spargo, for appellant.
   Submitted by Michael C. Lynch, for respondent Board.

    MEMORANDUM:


   The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed without costs
   for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division. We
   note, however, that nothing in this Court's affirmance implies that,
   under Election Law § 9 209(2)(d), the central board of inspectors
   has the discretion not to open the ballot envelopes and count the
   votes after the three day set aside period.

    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

   On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules, order
   affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum. Chief Judge Kaye and Judges
   Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick and Wesley concur.


   Decided October 22, 1997

SNIPPETS:
  • ALBANY COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
  • This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York
  • Submitted by Thomas J. Spargo, for appellant.
  • Submitted by Michael C. Lynch,
  • The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed without costs for the reasons stated
  • We note, however, that nothing in this Court's affirmance implies that, under Election Law §
  • On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules, order affirmed, without
  • Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick and Wesley concur.
  •    |