LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

PEOPLE v CERESOLI Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CourtCode: AP, CourtName: NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS, Plaintiff: PEOPLE, State: NEW YORK, UniqueCaseRef: NE>AP>088_0925, Juror, Appellant, Club, Respondent, Memorandum, York, Appellate Division, Toccolana Club, Rome, Cpl, Judge, Nominal Member, Relatives, Motion, Trial Court, Improper, Undisturbed Factual Finding, Support, Alleged Excessiveness, Scope, Review, Chief Judge Kaye, Judges Simons, Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick Concur , ContentID: 120251174

Case Documents
1 1996-06-28 OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 125083
1 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 1 page.    CAUTION.    PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS IS A ONE PAGE CASE.
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
APPELLANT
CLUB
RESPONDENT
MEMORANDUM
DEFENDANT
MEMBERS
YORK
APPELLATE DIVISION
TOCCOLANA CLUB
ROME
CPL
JUDGE
NOMINAL MEMBER
RELATIVES
MOTION
TRIAL COURT
IMPROPER
UNDISTURBED FACTUAL FINDING
SUPPORT
ALLEGED EXCESSIVENESS
SCOPE
REVIEW
CHIEF JUDGE KAYE
JUDGES SIMONS
TITONE
BELLACOSA
SMITH
LEVINE
CIPARICK CONCUR


  THE PEOPLE &C., RESPONDENT, v. JOHN A. CERESOLI, APPELLANT.

    88 N.Y.2d 925, 669 N.E.2d 1111, 646 N.Y.S.2d 789 (1996).
    June 28, 1996

   4 No. 209 (1996 NY Int. 151)
   Decided June 28, 1996
     _________________________________________________________________

   This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before
   publication in the New York Reports.

    Frank Policelli, for Appellant.
   Timothy P. Fitzgerald, for Respondent.

    MEMORANDUM:

    The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

    Defendant was charged with criminal possession of a forged instrument
   and with the theft of $3,500 from the Toccolana Club, a private social
   club in Rome, New York. After his conviction for grand larceny in the
   fourth degree (Penal Law § 155.30), defendant moved pursuant to CPL
   330.30 to set aside the verdict on the ground of juror misconduct
   involving a single seated juror. During voir dire, the juror, a
   resident of Rome, was asked whether he was "familiar with members of
   the Toccolano Club." The juror responded: "I just know where it is,
   not really, no." It was subsequently established that the juror had
   decades earlier himself been a nominal member of the club, and two of
   his relatives were or had been members.

    After a hearing on defendant's motion, the trial court found there
   was no improper conduct on the part of the juror, and further that the
   juror's conduct had not "affected a substantial right of defendant"
   (CPL 330.30(2)). The Appellate Division affirmed. The trial court's
   undisturbed factual finding has support in the record and, like the
   alleged excessiveness of defendant's sentence, is beyond the scope of
   our review.

    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

    Order affirmed, in a memorandum. Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons,
   Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine and Ciparick concur.
SNIPPETS:
  • This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York
  • Frank Policelli, for Appellant.
  • Timothy P. Fitzgerald, for Respondent.
  • The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
  • Defendant was charged with criminal possession of a forged instrument and with the theft of
  • After his conviction for grand larceny in the fourth degree, defendant moved pursuant to CPL
  • "I just know where it is, not really, no." It was subsequently established that the juror had
  • After a hearing on defendant's motion, the trial court found there was no improper conduct on
  • The trial court's undisturbed factual finding has support in the record and, like the alleged
  • Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine and Ciparick concur.
  •    |