THE PEOPLE &C., RESPONDENT, v. JOHN A. CERESOLI, APPELLANT.
88 N.Y.2d 925, 669 N.E.2d 1111, 646 N.Y.S.2d 789 (1996).
June 28, 1996
4 No. 209 (1996 NY Int. 151)
Decided June 28, 1996
_________________________________________________________________
This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before
publication in the New York Reports.
Frank Policelli, for Appellant.
Timothy P. Fitzgerald, for Respondent.
MEMORANDUM:
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Defendant was charged with criminal possession of a forged instrument
and with the theft of $3,500 from the Toccolana Club, a private social
club in Rome, New York. After his conviction for grand larceny in the
fourth degree (Penal Law § 155.30), defendant moved pursuant to CPL
330.30 to set aside the verdict on the ground of juror misconduct
involving a single seated juror. During voir dire, the juror, a
resident of Rome, was asked whether he was "familiar with members of
the Toccolano Club." The juror responded: "I just know where it is,
not really, no." It was subsequently established that the juror had
decades earlier himself been a nominal member of the club, and two of
his relatives were or had been members.
After a hearing on defendant's motion, the trial court found there
was no improper conduct on the part of the juror, and further that the
juror's conduct had not "affected a substantial right of defendant"
(CPL 330.30(2)). The Appellate Division affirmed. The trial court's
undisturbed factual finding has support in the record and, like the
alleged excessiveness of defendant's sentence, is beyond the scope of
our review.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Order affirmed, in a memorandum. Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons,
Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine and Ciparick concur.
SNIPPETS:
This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York
Frank Policelli, for Appellant.
Timothy P. Fitzgerald, for Respondent.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Defendant was charged with criminal possession of a forged instrument and with the theft of
After his conviction for grand larceny in the fourth degree, defendant moved pursuant to CPL
"I just know where it is, not really, no." It was subsequently established that the juror had
After a hearing on defendant's motion, the trial court found there was no improper conduct on
The trial court's undisturbed factual finding has support in the record and, like the alleged
Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine and Ciparick concur.
|