LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

OVERTON v CITY OF NEW YORK Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CourtCode: AP, CourtName: NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS, Plaintiff: OVERTON, State: NEW YORK, UniqueCaseRef: NE>AP>089_0850, York, Appellant, Memorandum, Respondents, City, Costs, Judge, Elizabeth, Natrella, Howard, Sherman, Appellate Division, Pool, Lifeguards, York City Health, Violation, Provisions, Proximate, Infant, Fatal Accident, Review, Submissions Pursuant, Chief Judge Kaye, Judges Simons, Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick Concur , ContentID: 120251158

Case Documents
1 1996-11-21 OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 125067
1 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 1 page.    CAUTION.    PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS IS A ONE PAGE CASE.
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
APPELLANT
MEMORANDUM
RESPONDENTS
CITY
COSTS
JUDGE
ELIZABETH
NATRELLA
HOWARD
SHERMAN
APPELLATE DIVISION
POOL
DEFENDANT
LIFEGUARDS
YORK CITY HEALTH
VIOLATION
PROVISIONS
PROXIMATE
INFANT
FATAL ACCIDENT
REVIEW
SUBMISSIONS PURSUANT
CHIEF JUDGE KAYE
JUDGES SIMONS
TITONE
BELLACOSA
SMITH
LEVINE
CIPARICK CONCUR


  VANESSA OVERTON, & C., RESPONDENTS, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, APPELLANT.

    89 N.Y.2d 850, 675 N.E.2d 1225, 653 N.Y.S.2d 273 (1996).
    November 21, 1996

   1 No. 292 SSM 28 (1996 NY Int. 229)
   Decided November 21, 1996
     _________________________________________________________________

   This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before
   publication in the New York Reports.

   Submitted by Elizabeth S. Natrella, for Appellant.
   Submitted by Howard B. Sherman, for Respondent.

   MEMORANDUM:

   The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed with costs and
   the complaint dismissed.

   Even though it is uncontroverted that on the day decedent drowned in a
   pool owned and operated by defendant there were fewer lifeguards than
   required by New York State Sanitary Code § 6-1.23 and New York City
   Health Code § 165.21(f), plaintiff failed to establish that the
   violation of these provisions was a proximate cause of her infant
   son's fatal accident.

   * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

   On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules, order
   reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, in a memorandum. Chief
   Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine and
   Ciparick concur.

   Decided November 21, 1996
SNIPPETS:
  • VANESSA OVERTON, & C., RESPONDENTS, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, APPELLANT.
  • This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York
  • Submitted by Elizabeth S. Natrella, for Appellant.
  • Submitted by Howard B. Sherman,
  • The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed with costs and the complaint dismissed.
  • Even though it is uncontroverted that on the day decedent drowned in a pool owned and
  • On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules, order reversed, with costs,
  • Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine and Ciparick concur.
  •    |