LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

LONG ISLAND POWER AUTH. v SHOREHAM-WADING RIVER CENT. SCH. DIST Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CourtCode: AP, CourtName: NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS, Plaintiff: LONG ISLAND POWER AUTH., State: NEW YORK, UniqueCaseRef: NE>AP>088_0503, Pilots, Lipa, Taxes, Lilco, Act, Payments, Public Authorities Law, Shoreham Plant, Tax, Taxing Jurisdictions, Lieu, Obligation, Island Power Authority, Assessments, Provisions, Assessed Valuations, Acquisition, Island Lighting Company, Respondents-appellants, School Districts, Nonoperative State, Suffolk County Tax, Tax Rolls, Legislative History, Construction, Real Property, Tax Liability, Statutory , ContentID: 120251116

Case Documents
1 1996-06-13 OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 125025
10 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 10 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
LIPA
TAXES
LILCO
ACT
PAYMENTS
PUBLIC AUTHORITIES LAW
SHOREHAM PLANT
TAX
TAXING JURISDICTIONS
LIEU
DEFENDANTS
OBLIGATION
ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY
ASSESSMENTS
PLAINTIFFS
PROVISIONS
ASSESSED VALUATIONS
ACQUISITION
ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY
RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS
SCHOOL DISTRICTS
NONOPERATIVE STATE
SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX
TAX ROLLS
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY
CONSTRUCTION
REAL PROPERTY
TAX LIABILITY
STATUTORY


  LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY AND LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY,
  RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS, v. SHOREHAM- WADING RIVER CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET
  AL., APPELLANTS- RESPONDENTS.

    N.Y.2d 503, 670 N.E.2d 419, 647 N.Y.S.2d 135 (1996).
    June 13, 1996

   2 No. 107 (1996 NY Int. 145)
   Decided June 13, 1996
     _________________________________________________________________

   This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication
   in the New York Reports.

    Ernest T. Bartol, Richard C. Hamburger, and Lou Lewis, for
   Appellants- respondents.
   Arthur J. Kremer and Michael Lesch, for Respondents-appellants.

    LEVINE, J.:

    These cross appeals involve the construction of provisions of the
   Long Island Power Authority Act (Public Authorities Law §§ l020 to
   1020-hh, L l986, ch 5l7 (eff. January l5, l987)), dealing with the
   obligation of plaintiff Long Island Power Authority (LIPA) to make
   payments in lieu of taxes (PILOTs) to the defendant local governmental
   taxing jurisdictions which otherwise would have been due from
   intervenor plaintiff Long Island Lighting Company (LILCO) except for
   LIPA's acquisition of LILCO's Shoreham Nuclear Power Plant. At issue
   are: (l) the effective date for substitution of LIPA's PILOT
   obligation for LILCO's real property tax liability on the Shoreham
   plant; (2) whether and at what level, if any, PILOTs on Shoreham are
   to continue in perpetuity; and (3) whether and to what extent LIPA may
   seek refunds on past PILOTs based upon court challenges to existing
   assessed valuations of the Shoreham plant.

    Enacted in l986, the LIPA Act created a public power authority having
   the prerogative to acquire all or part of LILCO's assets through a
   negotiated settlement, tender offer for LILCO's capital stock or the
   exercise of eminent domain (Public Authorities Law § l020-h). The Act
   further stipulated, however, that upon acquisition of the Shoreham
   plant, LIPA was to close and decommission the plant "forthwith"
   (Public Authorities Law § l020-h(9)).

    The LIPA Act gave LIPA tax exempt status, as a public authority,
   respecting any property it acquired from LILCO (Public Authorities Law
   § l020-p). In recognition of the potentially drastic fiscal impact of
SNIPPETS:
  • LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY AND LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY,
  • RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS, v. SHOREHAM- WADING RIVER CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET
  • These cross appeals involve the construction of provisions of the Long Island Power Authority
  • January l5, l987)), dealing with the obligation of plaintiff Long Island Power Authority to
  • the effective date for substitution of LIPA's PILOT obligation for LILCO's real property tax
  • The Act further stipulated, however, that upon acquisition of the Shoreham plant, LIPA was to
  • The LIPA Act gave LIPA tax exempt status, as a public authority, respecting any property it
  • In recognition of the potentially drastic fiscal impact of the loss of local property tax
  • Each year after property theretofore owned by LILCO is acquired by the authority by any means he in lieu of tax payments shall in the first year after the acquisition be equal to one hundred
  • In each succeeding year such in lieu of tax payments shall be decreased by ten percent until
  • Prior to the transfer of the Shoreham plant to LIPA on February 29, l992, LILCO had made a
  • Under tax legislation for Suffolk County, the tax year for real property taxes runs from
  • The defendants' answers asserted counterclaims seeking declarations that: LILCO was ompletely constructed and "nonoperative", and defendants could use all remedies provided by the
  • Plaintiffs and defendants cross appealed, and the Appellate Division affirmed.
  • We find no indication, either in the statutory language or legislative history, that the
  •    |