LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

MICHAELS v CITY OF BUFFALO Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CourtCode: AP, CourtName: NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS, Plaintiff: MICHAELS, State: NEW YORK, UniqueCaseRef: NE>AP>085_0754, Accident, Policy, Insurance, Ambulance, Insurer, Casualty, Delay, Damages, Defend, Appellantv, Auto, Injury, Mechanical Failure, Property Damage, Duty, Coverage, Construe, Matter, Judge, Respondent, Third-party, Decedent, Unfortunate, Vehicle, Death, Pay, Emphasis, Indemnify , ContentID: 120250842

Case Documents
1 1995-06-08 OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 124751
4 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 4 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
POLICY
INSURANCE
AMBULANCE
INSURER
CASUALTY
DELAY
BUSINESS
DAMAGES
DEFEND
APPELLANTV
AUTO
INJURY
MECHANICAL FAILURE
PROPERTY DAMAGE
DUTY
COVERAGE
COURT
CONSTRUE
MATTER
JUDGE
RESPONDENT
THIRD-PARTY
DECEDENT
UNFORTUNATE
VEHICLE
DEATH
PAY
EMPHASIS
INDEMNIFY


  ROBERT P. MICHAELS & C., APPELLANTv CITY OF BUFFALO, RESPONDANT
  MEMORIAL AMBULANCE SERVICE ,INC. THIRD PARTY APPELLANTv. LUMBERMAEN"S MUTUAL
  CASUALTY CO.,THIRD PARTY RESPONDENT

    85 N.Y.2d 754, 85 N.Y.2d 754, 651 N.E.2d 1272, 628 N.Y.S.2d 253 (1995).

    June 8, 1995

   4 No. 126 (1995 NY Int. 137)
   Decided June 8, 1995
     _________________________________________________________________

   This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before
   publication in the New York Reports.

    Diane F. Bosse, for third-party Appellant.
   Dan D. Kohane, for third-party Respondent.

    LEVINE, J.:

    On January 12, 1986, an ambulance was called to assist plaintiff's
   decedent, John Michaels, who was having trouble breathing. After he
   was attended to, he was placed inside the ambulance. Unfortunately,
   the ambulance could not be restarted. A new ambulance was summoned and
   arrived on the scene minutes later. Decedent was then transported by
   the second ambulance to a hospital where he died about twenty minutes
   later.

    Decedent's estate brought suit alleging, among other things, that the
   failure of the first ambulance to start was due to negligent
   maintenance of the vehicle and that the delay caused or contributed to
   the death. Memorial, the ambulance company, holds a "business auto
   policy" which provides that the insurer will "pay all sums the insured
   legally must pay as damages because of bodily injury or property
   damage to which this insurance applies, caused by an accident and
   resulting from the ownership, maintenance or use of a covered auto"
   (emphasis added). The insurance policy also provides that the
   insurance carrier has the right and duty to defend any suit asking for
   these damages.

    The insurer was given timely notice of the claim against its insured,
   but disclaimed coverage and a duty to defend on the ground that the
   loss was not "caused by an accident" as the term was used in the
   policy. Memorial then commenced a third-party action against the
   insurance company alleging that the policy required it to defend and
   indemnify the insured. The insurer brought a motion for summary
SNIPPETS:
  • ROBERT P. MICHAELS & C., APPELLANTv CITY OF BUFFALO, RESPONDANT MEMORIAL AMBULANCE
  • Diane F. Bosse, for third-party Appellant.
  • Dan D. Kohane, for third-party Respondent.
  • On January 12, 1986, an ambulance was called to assist plaintiff's decedent, John Michaels,
  • Decedent's estate brought suit alleging, among other things, that the failure of the first
  • Memorial, the ambulance company, holds a "business auto policy" which provides that the
  • The insurer was given timely notice of the claim against its insured, but disclaimed coverage
  • Memorial then commenced a third-party action against the insurance company alleging that the
  • Supreme Court found for Memorial, reasoning that the term "accident" as used in the policy
  • The Appellate Division reversed and granted the insurer's motion on the ground that delay
  • When interpreting the multifaceted term "accident" in an insurance policy, "we must construe
  • Thus in Miller, we held that a death caused by an apparently inadvertent heroin overdose was
  • In other cases, we have focused on whether the casualty, although unexpected, was
  • In sum, the stalling and resulting delay of the covered vehicle was merely a series of
  • Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Bellacosa, Smith and Ciparick concur.
  •    |