LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

CITY SCH. DIST. OF NEWBURGH v HUGH STUBBINS & ASSOCS., INC Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CourtCode: AP, CourtName: NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS, Plaintiff: CITY SCH. DIST. OF NEWBURGH, State: NEW YORK, UniqueCaseRef: NE>AP>085_0535, Construction, Contract, Damage, Ny2d, Respondent, Design, Negligence, School, Appellant, Pipe, Accrues, Sears, Roebuck, Liability, Contractual Relationship, Parties, Contends, City, Newburgh, Hugh Stubbins, Solart Builders, Chief Judge, Defective Construction, Udc, Architect, Statute, Limitations, Appellate Division , ContentID: 120250767

Case Documents
1 1995-05-02 OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 124676
3 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 3 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
CONTRACT
PLAINTIFF
DAMAGE
NY2D
RESPONDENT
DESIGN
NEGLIGENCE
SCHOOL
APPELLANT
PIPE
ACCRUES
DEFENDANTS
SEARS
ROEBUCK
LIABILITY
CONTRACTUAL RELATIONSHIP
PARTIES
CONTENDS
CITY
NEWBURGH
HUGH STUBBINS
SOLART BUILDERS
CHIEF JUDGE
DEFECTIVE CONSTRUCTION
UDC
ARCHITECT
STATUTE
LIMITATIONS
APPELLATE DIVISION


  CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT OF CITY OF NEWBURGH, APPELLANT, v. HUGH STUBBINS &
  ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL., RESPONDENTS.

    85 N.Y.2d 535, 650 N.E.2d 399, 626 N.Y.S.2d 741 (1995).
    May 2, 1995

   2 No. 78 (1995 NY Int. 096)
   Decided May 2, 1995
     _________________________________________________________________

   This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication
   in the New York Reports.

   John R. Casey, for Appellant.
   Thomas J. Graham, for Respondent Hugh Stubbins &c.
   Harold J. Bauman, for Respondent Solart Builders, Inc.
   Anthony P. Colavita, for Respondent Van Zelm, Heywood &c.
   Submitted by David L. Wong, for Respondents Silverman, et al.

   KAYE, CHIEF JUDGE:

   When a defectively assembled pipe fitting bursts, damaging a library's
   book collection, can the library sue those responsible for design and
   construction of the building some fifteen years earlier? Because the
   rule is settled that an owner's cause of action accrues against a
   builder upon completion of construction, and we perceive no basis to
   apply a different rule where a cause of action rests on damage to
   personal rather than real property, we conclude that plaintiff's cause
   of action was time-barred.

   In 1972 or 1973, the Urban Development Corporation agreed to assist
   the Newburgh School District in the design, financing and construction
   of a library. The City of Newburgh Urban Renewal Agency transferred
   title to a parcel of property to the UDC, which entered into contracts
   to construct the building with defendants Solart Builders, Inc. as
   general contractor, Hugh Stubbins & Associates, Inc. as architect, and
   Van Zelm, Heywood & Shadford as mechanical and electrical engineers.
   Upon completion of construction in late 1975, UDC sold the building to
   plaintiff.

   Within the structure of the building was a copper pipe fitted with a
   steel plug, which began a gradual chemical corrosion of the integrity
   of the pipe. Fifteen years later, on October 13, 1990, a water pipe in
   the library burst, causing plaintiff to suffer $1,500,000 damage to
   personal property-- including books, bookshelves, and office supplies
   and furnishings--and $500,000 damage to its real property. When
SNIPPETS:
  • CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT OF CITY OF NEWBURGH, APPELLANT, v. HUGH STUBBINS &
  • Thomas J. Graham, for Respondent Hugh Stubbins &c. Harold J. Bauman, for Respondent Solart
  • Because the rule is settled that an owner's cause of action accrues against a builder upon
  • In 1972 or 1973, the Urban Development Corporation agreed to assist the Newburgh School
  • The City of Newburgh Urban Renewal Agency transferred title to a parcel of property to the
  • Upon completion of construction in late 1975, UDC sold the building to plaintiff.
  • Within the structure of the building was a copper pipe fitted with a steel plug, which began
  • When plaintiff brought suit against defendants alleging five causes of action rooted in
  • In cases against architects or contractors, the accrual date for Statute of Limitations
  • We made clear in Sears, Roebuck v Enco Associates that no matter how a claim is characterized
  • Plaintiff recognizes that any claim for damage to the building itself would normally be
  • Here it was UDC--not plaintiff--that entered into a contract with defendants to build the
  • the order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed with costs.
  • Opinion by Chief Judge Kaye.
  •    |