![]() |
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
OPINION
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COHENS ESTATE DECEDENT CONSTRUCTIVE TRUST SURVIVING WILLS PARTY REVOKE LEGATEES NY2D REVOCATION EXECUTING APPELLATE DIVISION PARTIES PETITIONER COURT SURVIVING SPOUSE ENFORCE PORTION IMPOSITION LOST OVERCOME PRESUMPTION MAJORITY EQUITY CERTIFIED QUESTION SEPARATE JUDGE ADMINISTRATION |
IN THE MATTER OF HARRY ALEXANDER COHEN,
83 N.Y.2d 148, 629 N.E.2d 1356, 608 N.Y.S.2d 398 (1994).
February 17, 1994
2 No. 13 (1994 NY Int. 016)
Decided February 17, 1994
_________________________________________________________________
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication
in the New York Reports.
LEVINE, J.:
The decedent, Harry Alexander Cohen, and respondent Rae Cohen, an
elderly, childless married couple, executed mutual wills on April 15,
1982. Each will established a trust for the life of the surviving
spouse consisting of that portion of the testator's estate "equal to
the largest amount that can pass free of Federal estate tax by reason
of the unified credit and the State death tax credit", with the corpus
to be distributed upon the surviving spouse's death among named
relatives of the decedent and Mrs. Cohen in specified percentages,
resulting in an equal division of the trust property between the
decedent's family and Mrs. Cohen's family. Each will devised the
residue of the testator's estate to the surviving spouse, absolutely.
At the time they executed their wills, the decedent and Mrs. Cohen
also entered into a written agreement making each of their wills
irrevocable except upon the consent of the other spouse. The agreement
recited that the parties had simultaneously executed wills effectively
bequeathing their respective estates one-half to the decedent's
relatives and one- half to Mrs. Cohen's relatives, and that they
intended the wills to be permanently reciprocal so that the will of
the survivor could not be changed after the first of them died. The
agreement specifically provided that neither party could revoke or
alter that party's will without the written assent of the other and
that any such unassented to (by both parties) revocation or alteration
would not be effective as against the legatees named in that will. In
another provision, the Cohens agreed that any inter vivos gift to a
legatee by the surviving spouse was to be deemed an advancement on the
legacy of that donee under the survivor's will and that "every legatee
(named in their wills) is hereby made a third party beneficiary of
this agreement".
Decedent died in December 1986, survived by Mrs. Cohen. She applied
for and was issued Letters of Administration, based upon her sworn
SNIPPETS:
|
| | | |