LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

IN THE MATTER OF HARRY ALEXANDER Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CourtCode: AP, CourtName: NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS, State: NEW YORK, UniqueCaseRef: NE>AP>083_0148, Agreement, Cohens, Estate, Decedent, Constructive Trust, Surviving, Wills, Party, Revoke, Legatees, Ny2d, Revocation, Executing, Appellate Division, Parties, Petitioner, Surviving Spouse, Enforce, Portion, Imposition, Lost, Overcome, Presumption, Majority, Equity, Certified Question, Separate, Judge, Administration , ContentID: 120250577

Case Documents
1 1994-02-17 OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 124486
4 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 4 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COHENS
ESTATE
DECEDENT
CONSTRUCTIVE TRUST
SURVIVING
WILLS
PARTY
REVOKE
LEGATEES
NY2D
REVOCATION
EXECUTING
APPELLATE DIVISION
PARTIES
PETITIONER
COURT
SURVIVING SPOUSE
ENFORCE
PORTION
IMPOSITION
LOST
OVERCOME
PRESUMPTION
MAJORITY
EQUITY
CERTIFIED QUESTION
SEPARATE
JUDGE
ADMINISTRATION


  IN THE MATTER OF HARRY ALEXANDER COHEN,

    83 N.Y.2d 148, 629 N.E.2d 1356, 608 N.Y.S.2d 398 (1994).
    February 17, 1994

   2 No. 13 (1994 NY Int. 016)
   Decided February 17, 1994
     _________________________________________________________________

   This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication
   in the New York Reports.

   LEVINE, J.:

   The decedent, Harry Alexander Cohen, and respondent Rae Cohen, an
   elderly, childless married couple, executed mutual wills on April 15,
   1982. Each will established a trust for the life of the surviving
   spouse consisting of that portion of the testator's estate "equal to
   the largest amount that can pass free of Federal estate tax by reason
   of the unified credit and the State death tax credit", with the corpus
   to be distributed upon the surviving spouse's death among named
   relatives of the decedent and Mrs. Cohen in specified percentages,
   resulting in an equal division of the trust property between the
   decedent's family and Mrs. Cohen's family. Each will devised the
   residue of the testator's estate to the surviving spouse, absolutely.

   At the time they executed their wills, the decedent and Mrs. Cohen
   also entered into a written agreement making each of their wills
   irrevocable except upon the consent of the other spouse. The agreement
   recited that the parties had simultaneously executed wills effectively
   bequeathing their respective estates one-half to the decedent's
   relatives and one- half to Mrs. Cohen's relatives, and that they
   intended the wills to be permanently reciprocal so that the will of
   the survivor could not be changed after the first of them died. The
   agreement specifically provided that neither party could revoke or
   alter that party's will without the written assent of the other and
   that any such unassented to (by both parties) revocation or alteration
   would not be effective as against the legatees named in that will. In
   another provision, the Cohens agreed that any inter vivos gift to a
   legatee by the surviving spouse was to be deemed an advancement on the
   legacy of that donee under the survivor's will and that "every legatee
   (named in their wills) is hereby made a third party beneficiary of
   this agreement".

   Decedent died in December 1986, survived by Mrs. Cohen. She applied
   for and was issued Letters of Administration, based upon her sworn
SNIPPETS:
  • Each will established a trust for the life of the surviving spouse consisting of that portion Cohen's family.
  • At the time they executed their wills, the decedent and Mrs. Cohen also entered into a
  • The agreement recited that the parties had simultaneously executed wills effectively
  • The agreement specifically provided that neither party could revoke or alter that party's
  • the Cohens agreed that any inter vivos gift to a legatee by the surviving spouse was to be
  • She applied for and was issued Letters of Administration, based upon her sworn statement that
  • Petitioner, a nephew of decedent and a legatee, co-executor and co-trustee under the
  • After trial of the outstanding factual issues, Surrogate's Court found that petitioner's
  • On Mrs. Cohen's appeal to the Appellate Division, the entire Court agreed with Surrogate's
  • A three-Justice majority upheld Surrogate's Court's determination that the contemporaneous
  • The Appellate Division granted leave to appeal to Mrs. Cohen and to petitioner on the
  • The surviving party to the agreement, however, reneged by later executing a new will or
  • Accordingly, the order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, the petition dismissed,
  • Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Bellacosa, Smith and Ciparick concur.
  •    |