IN THE MATTER OF MARGARET HAMBURG, AS ACTING COMMISSIONER OF THE NEW YORK
CITY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, ET AL. v. LORNA MCBARNETTE, AS ACTING COMMISSIONER
OF THE NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, ET AL.,
83 N.Y.2d 726, 635 N.E.2d 1225, 613 N.Y.S.2d 355 (1994).
June 14, 1994
1 No. 104 (1994 NY Int. 101)
Decided June 14, 1994
_________________________________________________________________
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication
in the New York Reports.
SMITH, J.:
The issue in this case is whether the determination of the State
Department of Health (State DOH), denying State aid reimbursement to
the New York City Department of Health (City DOH) for certain public
health services that were contracted-out to other City agencies, was
arbitrary and capricious.
In 1986, the Legislature enacted, effective January 1, 1988, a new
article VI of the Public Health Law (L 1986, ch 901) "to increase
State assistance for public health and to encourage enhanced local
public health activities" (Governor's Mem approving L 1986, ch 901,
1986 NY Legis Ann, at 367). The new legislation was designed to assist
localities in providing specific health care needs. The legislation
was designed to support and increase the level of funding and
oversight for such programs but not to supplant such funding.
The new article VI governs State reimbursement for local public health
services and establishes new procedures for State review of those
services to determine eligibility for reimbursement. A municipality is
required, among other things, to submit to the State DOH an
application for State aid, a municipal public health services plan and
a detailed report of all expenditures on public health services funded
by the State (see, Public Health Law § 600). The municipality is also
required to employ a Commissioner of Health to supervise the provision
of public health services (see, id.; § 604). The application for State
aid must include an organizational chart of the municipal health
agency, a detailed budget of proposed expenditures, a description of
proposed program activities, a copy of the municipal public health
services plan and a certification from a governing body of the
municipality that the proposed expenditures are consistent with the
plan (see, id., § 601).
SNIPPETS:
IN THE MATTER OF MARGARET HAMBURG, AS ACTING COMMISSIONER OF THE NEW YORK
CITY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, ET AL. v. LORNA MCBARNETTE, AS ACTING COMMISSIONER
The issue in this case is whether the determination of the State Department of Health (State
The new legislation was designed to assist localities in providing specific health care needs.
The new article VI governs State reimbursement for local public health services and
A municipality is required, among other things, to submit to the State DOH an application for
The State DOH is authorized to promulgate rules and regulations that define the activities
In addition, the State DOH may withhold State aid reimbursement if the municipality does not
Effective January 1, 1988, the State DOH promulgated regulations implementing the new
However, the cost of programs or services for which municipalities have been given legal
The plan included certain public health services that were provided through contracts with
Pursuant to the contracts, the City DOH required the City agencies to submit detailed
The State DOH argues that the interpretation of the statutory provisions at issue here
The City DOH contends that the interpretation afforded by the State DOH is irrational because
Public Health Law § 604 requires a municipality to "employ a full-time local commissioner of
We agree with the Appellate Division that although the City agencies involved are authorized
|