LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

HAMBURG v MCBARNETTE Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CourtCode: AP, CourtName: NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS, Plaintiff: HAMBURG, State: NEW YORK, UniqueCaseRef: NE>AP>083_0726, Health, City, Public Health, Doh, Reimbursement, Municipality, City Agencies, Plan, State Aid, Contracts, Commissioner, Regulations, Public Health Law, Care, Supervise, Provisions, Statutory, Responsibility, Cost, York, Legislature, City Department, Reports, Local Public Health, Expenditures, Authorizing, Pursuant, Nycrr, Legal Responsibility, Interpretation , ContentID: 120250567

Case Documents
1 1994-06-14 OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 124476
5 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 5 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
CITY
PUBLIC HEALTH
DOH
REIMBURSEMENT
MUNICIPALITY
CITY AGENCIES
PLAN
STATE AID
CONTRACTS
COMMISSIONER
REGULATIONS
PUBLIC HEALTH LAW
CARE
SUPERVISE
PROVISIONS
STATUTORY
RESPONSIBILITY
COST
YORK
LEGISLATURE
CITY DEPARTMENT
REPORTS
LOCAL PUBLIC HEALTH
EXPENDITURES
AUTHORIZING
PURSUANT
NYCRR
LEGAL RESPONSIBILITY
INTERPRETATION


  IN THE MATTER OF MARGARET HAMBURG, AS ACTING COMMISSIONER OF THE NEW YORK
  CITY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, ET AL. v. LORNA MCBARNETTE, AS ACTING COMMISSIONER
  OF THE NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, ET AL.,

    83 N.Y.2d 726, 635 N.E.2d 1225, 613 N.Y.S.2d 355 (1994).
    June 14, 1994

   1 No. 104 (1994 NY Int. 101)
   Decided June 14, 1994
     _________________________________________________________________

   This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication
   in the New York Reports.

   SMITH, J.:

   The issue in this case is whether the determination of the State
   Department of Health (State DOH), denying State aid reimbursement to
   the New York City Department of Health (City DOH) for certain public
   health services that were contracted-out to other City agencies, was
   arbitrary and capricious.

   In 1986, the Legislature enacted, effective January 1, 1988, a new
   article VI of the Public Health Law (L 1986, ch 901) "to increase
   State assistance for public health and to encourage enhanced local
   public health activities" (Governor's Mem approving L 1986, ch 901,
   1986 NY Legis Ann, at 367). The new legislation was designed to assist
   localities in providing specific health care needs. The legislation
   was designed to support and increase the level of funding and
   oversight for such programs but not to supplant such funding.

   The new article VI governs State reimbursement for local public health
   services and establishes new procedures for State review of those
   services to determine eligibility for reimbursement. A municipality is
   required, among other things, to submit to the State DOH an
   application for State aid, a municipal public health services plan and
   a detailed report of all expenditures on public health services funded
   by the State (see, Public Health Law § 600). The municipality is also
   required to employ a Commissioner of Health to supervise the provision
   of public health services (see, id.; § 604). The application for State
   aid must include an organizational chart of the municipal health
   agency, a detailed budget of proposed expenditures, a description of
   proposed program activities, a copy of the municipal public health
   services plan and a certification from a governing body of the
   municipality that the proposed expenditures are consistent with the
   plan (see, id., § 601).
SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE MATTER OF MARGARET HAMBURG, AS ACTING COMMISSIONER OF THE NEW YORK
  • CITY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, ET AL. v. LORNA MCBARNETTE, AS ACTING COMMISSIONER
  • The issue in this case is whether the determination of the State Department of Health (State
  • The new legislation was designed to assist localities in providing specific health care needs.
  • The new article VI governs State reimbursement for local public health services and
  • A municipality is required, among other things, to submit to the State DOH an application for
  • The State DOH is authorized to promulgate rules and regulations that define the activities
  • In addition, the State DOH may withhold State aid reimbursement if the municipality does not
  • Effective January 1, 1988, the State DOH promulgated regulations implementing the new
  • However, the cost of programs or services for which municipalities have been given legal
  • The plan included certain public health services that were provided through contracts with
  • Pursuant to the contracts, the City DOH required the City agencies to submit detailed
  • The State DOH argues that the interpretation of the statutory provisions at issue here
  • The City DOH contends that the interpretation afforded by the State DOH is irrational because
  • Public Health Law § 604 requires a municipality to "employ a full-time local commissioner of
  • We agree with the Appellate Division that although the City agencies involved are authorized
  •    |