LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

COUNTY OF COLUMBIA v CONTINENTAL INS. CO Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CourtCode: AP, CourtName: NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS, Plaintiff: COUNTY OF COLUMBIA, State: NEW YORK, UniqueCaseRef: NE>AP>083_0618, Injury, County, Coverage, Personal Injury, Endorsement, Policies, Insurers, Property Damage, Pollution, Waste, Bodily Injury, Liability, Pollution Exclusion, Underlying Action, Complaint, Policy, Insurance, Allege, Solid Waste, Obligates, Wrongful Entry, Invasion, Eviction, Duty, Solid Waste Management, Waste Management Facility, Hks, Provisions , ContentID: 120250549

Case Documents
1   OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 124458
6 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 6 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DEFENDANTS
COUNTY
COVERAGE
PERSONAL INJURY
ENDORSEMENT
POLICIES
INSURERS
PROPERTY DAMAGE
POLLUTION
WASTE
BODILY INJURY
LIABILITY
POLLUTION EXCLUSION
UNDERLYING ACTION
COMPLAINT
POLICY
INSURANCE
ALLEGE
SOLID WASTE
OBLIGATES
WRONGFUL ENTRY
INVASION
PLAINTIFF
EVICTION
DUTY
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
HKS
PROVISIONS


  COUNTY OF COLUMBIA v. CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL.,

    83 N.Y.2d 618, 634 N.E.2d 946, 612 N.Y.S.2d 345 (1994).
    May 12, 1994

   3 No. 59 (1994 NY Int. 087)
   Decided May 12, 1994
     _________________________________________________________________

   This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication
   in the New York Reports.

   SMITH, J.:

   This is a declaratory judgment action in which plaintiff seeks an
   order that defendants are required to provide legal representation and
   coverage for an action brought against it. Specifically, the issue is
   whether "personal injury" endorsements in policies issued to plaintiff
   by defendants require representation and coverage for liability
   arising from alleged property damage resulting from the leaching of
   toxic chemicals.

   I

   Each of the defendants insured plaintiff under comprehensive general
   liability policies during the period in question. (n 1) All of the
   policies contained a personal injury and advertising injury liability
   endorsement, under which the insurers agreed to "pay on behalf of the
   insured all sums which the insured shall become legally obligated to
   pay as damages because of personal injury * * * to which this
   insurance applies sustained by any person or organization and arising
   out of the conduct of the named insured's business." Personal injury
   was defined to include injury arising out of "wrongful entry or
   eviction or other invasion of the right of private occupancy." (n
   2)

   The subject policies also provided coverage, with certain exceptions,
   for property damage, bodily injury and personal injury liability. The
   sections of the policies providing coverage for bodily injury and
   property damage stated that the insurers would "pay on behalf of the
   insured all sums which the insured shall become legally obligated to
   pay as damages because of bodily injury (n 3) or property damage
   (n 4) to which this insurance applies caused by an occurrence," and
   that the insurers had a duty to defend any suit against the insured
   seeking damages on account of such bodily injury or property damage.

SNIPPETS:
  • This is a declaratory judgment action in which plaintiff seeks an order that defendants are
  • the issue is whether "personal injury" endorsements in policies issued to plaintiff by
  • All of the policies contained a personal injury and advertising injury liability endorsement,
  • The sections of the policies providing coverage for bodily injury and property damage stated
  • The facts giving rise to the underlying action, as well as to this action, are as follows.
  • In 1981, the County agreed to develop a solid waste management disposal system in the Town of
  • A penalty of $1,000, assessed against the Town, was suspended provided the Town closed the
  • In January 1989, HKS Hunt Club, Inc., a corporation that owns property adjacent to the
  • The complaint incorporated the allegations in the Town's complaint against the County and
  • asserting that pollution exclusion clauses in the subject policies relieved them of any duty
  • Supreme Court granted defendants' motion and cross motion for summary judgment and denied the invasion of the right of private occupancy," and the County's willful violation of a penal statute
  • The majority concluded that defendants are not obligated to defend the County in the ising Injury Liability endorsement.
  • It is plaintiff's contention that the personal injury endorsement obligates defendants to
  • Moreover, it is settled that in construing an endorsement to an insurance policy, the
  •    |