LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

CARVAN ASSOCS. v AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE CORP Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CourtCode: AP, CourtName: NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS, Plaintiff: CARVAN ASSOCS., State: NEW YORK, UniqueCaseRef: NE>AP>084_0927, Appellant, American, Dismissing, Complaint, Memorandum, Appellate Division, Supreme Court, Judge, Respondents, American Home Assurance, Third-party, Delro Industries, Northberry Concrete, Litton Systems, Costs, Certified Question, Ad2d, Prior Action, Willful, Obey Court-ordered Disclosure, Cplr, Chief Judge Kaye, Judges Simons, Titone, Bellacosa, Levine, Ciparick Concur, Judge Smith , ContentID: 120250542

Case Documents
1 1994-11-29 OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 124451
1 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 1 page.    CAUTION.    PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS IS A ONE PAGE CASE.
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
AMERICAN
DISMISSING
PLAINTIFFS
COMPLAINT
DEFENDANT
MEMORANDUM
APPELLATE DIVISION
SUPREME COURT
JUDGE
RESPONDENTS
AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE
THIRD-PARTY
DELRO INDUSTRIES
NORTHBERRY CONCRETE
LITTON SYSTEMS
COSTS
CERTIFIED QUESTION
AD2D
PRIOR ACTION
WILLFUL
OBEY COURT-ORDERED DISCLOSURE
CPLR
CHIEF JUDGE KAYE
JUDGES SIMONS
TITONE
BELLACOSA
LEVINE
CIPARICK CONCUR
JUDGE SMITH


  Carven Associates a/k/a Carvan Associates, et al., Respondents, v. American
  Home Assurance Corp., Appellant. v. American Pecco Corporation, et al.,
  Third-Party Defendants, and Delro Industries, Inc., Charles V. Castaldo
  Construction Corp., Northberry Concrete Corp., and Litton Systems, Inc.,
  Third-Party Appellants.

    84 N.Y.2d 927, 644 N.E.2d 1368, 620 N.Y.S.2d 812 (1994).
    November 29, 1994

   1 No. 213 (1994 NY Int. 187) Decided November 29, 1994
     _________________________________________________________________

   This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before
   publication in the New York Reports.

   Andrew C. Jacobson, for appellant American Home Assurance.
   David B. Hamm, for appellant Delro Industries.
   Donald D. Brown, Jr., for appellant Litton Systems.
   Edward J. Guardaro, for appellant Northberry Concrete.
   Dennis T. D'Antonio, for respondent.

   MEMORANDUM:

   The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, without costs,
   and the order of Supreme Court dismissing plaintiffs' complaint
   reinstated. The certified question should be answered in the negative.

   In the singular circumstances presented by this appeal we conclude
   that Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion to dismiss the
   complaint and the third party complaint, even after its previous
   denial of defendant American Home's motion had been affirmed by the
   Appellate Division, First Department (173 AD2d 369). A subsequent
   order of the Appellate Division, Second Department (175 AD2d 790),
   determined that a prior action by plaintiffs based upon the same
   events as the present action had been dismissed for their willful and
   repeated refusal to obey court-ordered disclosure and accordingly,
   plaintiffs were not entitled to reinstitute their action against
   defendant (see, CPLR 205(a)).

   * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

   Order reversed, without costs, order of Supreme Court dismissing
   plaintiffs' complaint reinstated and certified question answered in
   the negative, in a memorandum. Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons,
   Titone, Bellacosa, Levine and Ciparick concur. Judge Smith took no
   part.
SNIPPETS:
  • Carven Associates a/k/a Carvan Associates, et al., Respondents, v. American Home Assurance
  • American Pecco Corporation, et al., Third-Party Defendants, and Delro Industries, Inc.,
  • This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York
  • for appellant American Home Assurance.
  • David B. Hamm, for appellant Delro Industries.
  • Donald D. Brown, Jr., for appellant Litton Systems.
  • Edward J. Guardaro, for appellant Northberry Concrete.
  • In the singular circumstances presented by this appeal we conclude that Supreme Court
  • A subsequent order of the Appellate Division, Second Department, determined that a prior
  • Order reversed, without costs, order of Supreme Court dismissing plaintiffs' complaint
  • Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Bellacosa, Levine and Ciparick concur.
  • Judge Smith took no part.
  •    |