LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

WHITE v CITY OF NEW YORK Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CourtCode: AP, CourtName: NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS, Plaintiff: WHITE, State: NEW YORK, UniqueCaseRef: NE>AP>081_0955, Nycha, Housing, Police, Incident, Empire, Police Officer, Housing Authority, Report, York, Appellate Division, Ny2d, City, Coverage, Security, Reasonableness, Excuse, Liability, Delay, Enga White, Third-party, Insurance, Memorandum, Affirm, Requiring, Employees, Superiors, Carrier, Forwarding, Police Department, Impute , ContentID: 120250525

Case Documents
1 1993-04-29 OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 124434
3 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 3 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
HOUSING
POLICE
INCIDENT
EMPIRE
POLICE OFFICER
HOUSING AUTHORITY
REPORT
YORK
APPELLATE DIVISION
NY2D
CITY
COVERAGE
SECURITY
REASONABLENESS
EXCUSE
LIABILITY
DELAY
ENGA WHITE
THIRD-PARTY
INSURANCE
MEMORANDUM
AFFIRM
REQUIRING
EMPLOYEES
SUPERIORS
CARRIER
FORWARDING
POLICE DEPARTMENT
IMPUTE


  ENGA WHITE, &C., ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK ET AL.,
  DEFENDANTS. / NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY, THIRD-PARTY APPELLANT, v. ALL
  CITY INSURANCE COMPANY, &C., THIRD-PARTY RESPONDENT, ET AL., THIRD-PARTY
  DEFENDANTS.

    81 N.Y.2d 955, 615 N.E.2d 216, 598 N.Y.S.2d 759 (1993).
    April 29, 1993

   1 No. 88 (1993 N.Y. Int. 90)
   Decided April 29, 1993
     _________________________________________________________________

   This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before
   publication in the New York Reports.

   Bruce M. Young, for Appellant.
   Alyne I. Diamond, for Respondent.
     _________________________________________________________________

   MEMORANDUM:

   The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

   On September 2, 1975, four-year-old Enga White fell from a slide at a
   playground in project housing owned and maintained by the New York
   City Housing Authority (NYCHA), fracturing her skull and requiring six
   days hospitalization. The only witnesses to the accident were Enga's
   three brothers, ages 9, 13 and 14. A Housing Authority Police Officer
   was called to the scene, filled out an incident report in triplicate,
   filed one copy with his precinct command, and sent two copies to his
   superiors. No other Housing Authority personnel were aware of the
   incident at that time.

   Ten years later, on September 11, 1985, Enga's mother moved for--and
   was granted--permission to file a late notice of claim against NYCHA
   after Enga began to have seizures allegedly attributable to the
   playground incident. On October 22, 1985, NYCHA gave notice of the
   claim to Empire, its insurance carrier. Empire disclaimed coverage on
   the grounds that the notice was not given "as soon as practicable" as
   required by the policy. NYCHA commenced this third party action
   against Empire for a declaratory judgment that there was coverage.

   At a hearing held solely on this issue, testimony revealed that NYCHA
   generally gave notice to Empire by either filling out a special
   insurance report form or by forwarding a notice of claim; the form
   filled out by the Housing Police Officer had three copies--one of
SNIPPETS:
  • THE CITY OF NEW YORK ET AL.,
  • / NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY, THIRD-PARTY APPELLANT, v.
  • This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York
  • The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed,
  • On September 2, 1975, four-year-old Enga White fell from a slide at a playground in project
  • A Housing Authority Police Officer was called to the scene, filled out an incident report in
  • On October 22, 1985, NYCHA gave notice of the claim to Empire, its insurance carrier.
  • Empire disclaimed coverage on the grounds that the notice was not given "as soon as
  • At a hearing held solely on this issue, testimony revealed that NYCHA generally gave notice to NYCHA, and there was no procedure established for NYCHA to receive such forms; and NYCHA did not
  • Supreme Court refused to impute the knowledge of the Housing Police to the NYCHA.
  • We now affirm the Appellate Division.
  • The requirement that an insured notify its liability carrier of a potential claim "as soon as
  • There may be circumstances, such as lack of knowledge that an accident has occurred or a
  • NYCHA seeks to excuse its ten-year delay in notifying Empire by explaining that its employees
  •    |