LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

REUTERS LTD. v TAX APPEALS TRIBUNAL Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CourtCode: AP, CourtName: NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS, Plaintiff: REUTERS LTD., State: NEW YORK, UniqueCaseRef: NE>AP>081_0112, Tax, Income, Reuters, York, Enterprise, Apportionment, Worldwide, United States, Treaty, Net Income, Franchise Tax, Clause, Taxation, Appellate Division, Foreign, United Kingdom, Apportionment Formula, Foreign Commerce, Deficiency, Branch Office, Nondiscrimination Clause, Discrimination, Operating, Determination, Commissioner, Judge, Unitary Business, Supreme Court , ContentID: 120250499

Case Documents
1 1993-10-12 OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 124408
6 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 6 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
INCOME
REUTERS
YORK
BUSINESS
ENTERPRISE
APPORTIONMENT
WORLDWIDE
UNITED STATES
TREATY
NET INCOME
FRANCHISE TAX
CLAUSE
TAXATION
APPELLATE DIVISION
COURT
FOREIGN
UNITED KINGDOM
APPORTIONMENT FORMULA
FOREIGN COMMERCE
DEFICIENCY
BRANCH OFFICE
NONDISCRIMINATION CLAUSE
DISCRIMINATION
OPERATING
DETERMINATION
COMMISSIONER
JUDGE
UNITARY BUSINESS
SUPREME COURT


  IN THE MATTER OF REUTERS LIMITED, APPELLANT, v. TAX APPEALS TRIBUNAL ET AL.,
  RESPONDENTS.

    82 N.Y.2d 112, 623 N.E.2d 1145, 603 N.Y.S.2d 795 (1993).
    October 12, 1993

   3 No. 186 (1993 NY Int. 185)
   Decided October 12, 1993
     _________________________________________________________________

   This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication
   in the New York Reports.

   Steven Alan Reiss, for Appellant.
   Daniel Smirlock, for Respondents.
     _________________________________________________________________

   BELLACOSA, J.:

   In this article 78 proceeding, petitioner-appellant Reuters Limited
   challenges a corporate franchise tax deficiency assessment. At issue
   is whether New York State's calculation of petitioner's franchise tax
   on the basis of the worldwide net income apportionment method violates
   the nondiscrimination clause of the United States-United Kingdom Tax
   Treaty (Convention Between United States and United Kingdom for
   Avoidance of Double Taxation, Dec. 31, 1975, 31 UST 5668). We agree
   with the conclusion of the Appellate Division that application of New
   York's apportionment formula to the worldwide net income of a single
   multijurisdictional business enterprise, operating internationally,
   does not violate the Treaty's nondiscrimination clause. The Appellate
   Division judgment, confirming the determination of the Tax Appeals
   Tribunal and the Commissioner of Taxation and Finance, should be
   affirmed.

   Reuters Limited, a corporation organized in the United Kingdom, does
   business in approximately 80 countries. During taxable years 1977
   through 1979, it maintained a branch office in New York City, which
   served as its principal United States office. Although Reuters earned
   profits abroad during the tax years in question, its New York branch
   incurred losses. Reuters computed its corporate franchise taxes for
   the tax years 1977 through 1979 on the basis of United States income
   only, and paid no franchise tax for those years because it also
   claimed losses on its United States operations. In 1983, the
   Department of Taxation and Finance performed an audit using the
   worldwide net income apportionment method and issued notices of
   deficiency totalling $1,280,000 for the tax years 1977 through 1979.
SNIPPETS:
  • petitioner-appellant Reuters Limited challenges a corporate franchise tax deficiency
  • At issue is whether New York State's calculation of petitioner's franchise tax on the basis
  • We agree with the conclusion of the Appellate Division that application of New York's
  • The Appellate Division judgment, confirming the determination of the Tax Appeals Tribunal and
  • In 1983, the Department of Taxation and Finance performed an audit using the worldwide net
  • An Administrative Law Judge sustained the notices of deficiency.
  • After this Court dismissed an appeal taken as of right on the ground that no substantial
  • it is unclear whether the truncated phrase "carrying on the same activities" requires that
  • As the Appellate Division aptly noted, a branch office "has no corporate or jural identity
  • Reuters' contention that Treaty article 24requires that its New York business activities be
  • The United States Supreme Court, however, has upheld and described that principle as "the
  • In a separate argument, Reuters claims that New York's use of worldwide net income
  •    |