LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

PHOENIX ACQUISITION CORP. v CAMPCORE, INC Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CourtCode: AP, CourtName: NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS, Plaintiff: PHOENIX ACQUISITION CORP., State: NEW YORK, UniqueCaseRef: NE>AP>081_0138, Guaranty, Payment, Wickwire, Marine, Obligation, Limitations, Acceleration, Statute, Indebtedness, Debtor, Campcore, Appellate Division, Installment, Acceleration Option, Loan, Debt, Bank, Creditor, Exercise, Pay, Provision, Liability, Supreme Court, Reversing, Immediate, Term Loan, Accrues, Demand, Contrast, Amount , ContentID: 120250492

Case Documents
1 1993-03-30 OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 124401
5 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 5 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
PAYMENT
WICKWIRE
MARINE
OBLIGATION
LIMITATIONS
ACCELERATION
STATUTE
INDEBTEDNESS
DEBTOR
CAMPCORE
APPELLATE DIVISION
INSTALLMENT
ACCELERATION OPTION
LOAN
DEBT
BANK
CREDITOR
EXERCISE
PAY
PROVISION
LIABILITY
SUPREME COURT
REVERSING
IMMEDIATE
TERM LOAN
ACCRUES
DEMAND
CONTRAST
AMOUNT


  PHOENIX ACQUISITION CORPORATION ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, v. CAMPCORE, INC., ET
  AL., DEFENDANTS, CHESTER WICKWIRE, F/N/U DYGERT, RESPONDENT, MARINE MIDLAND
  BANK, N.A., APPELLANT.

    81 N.Y.2d 138, 612 N.E.2d 1219, 596 N.Y.S.2d 752 (1993).
    March 30, 1993

   4 No. 52 (1993 N.Y. Int. 55)
   Decided March 30, 1993
     _________________________________________________________________

   This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication
   in the New York Reports.

   Thomas C. Buckel, Jr., for Appellant.
   Theodore Fenstermacher, for Respondent.
     _________________________________________________________________

   BELLACOSA, J.:

   We granted leave in this case to decide whether defendant-debtor
   Campcore, Inc.'s default on one installment payment under its
   promissory note triggered the Statute of Limitations accrual against
   the entire debt. Upon that initial default in the installment payment,
   the creditor, Marine Midland Bank, chose not to exercise its option to
   accelerate the balance of the indebtedness. At issue is Marine's
   attempt to recover against a guarantor, Chester Wickwire ("Wickwire"),
   on otherwise timely portions of Campcore's debt. Supreme Court and the
   Appellate Division ruled that the Statute of Limitations blocked
   Marine's reach against guarantor-Wickwire, because Wickwire became
   obligated to pay the whole debt upon the initial default in a payment
   by Campcore. On the grant of leave to appeal to Marine, we now reverse
   the order of the Appellate Division.

   I.

   In July 1978, appellant-creditor Marine loaned Campcore $500,000,
   secured by a promissory note providing, in part, that "(t)he holder
   hereof shall have the option to declare the balance due and owing
   hereunder at any time to be immediately due and payable * * * upon the
   happening of * * * . Non-payment of any sum of principal or interest
   on the date which the same shall become due * * * *" The term loan
   agreement between the debtor and creditor contained a corresponding
   acceleration option exercisable unilaterally by the creditor bank.
   Marine later acquired a mortgage from Phoenix Acquisition Corp. and
   Dome Corp. as security for the loan.
SNIPPETS:
  • We granted leave in this case to decide whether defendant-debtor Campcore, Inc.'s default on
  • Upon that initial default in the installment payment, the creditor, Marine Midland Bank,
  • At issue is Marine's attempt to recover against a guarantor, Chester Wickwire, on otherwise
  • Supreme Court and the Appellate Division ruled that the Statute of Limitations blocked
  • Non-payment of any sum of principal or interest on the date which the same shall become due *
  • This guaranty also contained a provision that Marine would notify Wickwire of default in
  • The contractual language fixes the boundaries of the legal obligation of the guarantor.
  • Wickwire acknowledges that the extent of the debtor's liability following a single, skipped
  • However, he would contrast the debtor's limited obligation on a default in a single payment
  • Wickwire finds support for this view in particular language of the guaranty, which stipulates
  • That case holds that where a guaranty is one of payment, liability under a guaranty attaches
  • The Statute of Limitations affecting a note payable upon demand, without doubt, begins to run
  • Inasmuch as we are reversing the order of the Appellate Division and denying Wickwire's
  •    |