 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
SUMMARY JUDGMENT ORDER
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DEFENDANTS LICENSING MOTION SUMMARY JUDGMENT COURT PATENT GILLETTE RULING BASIS OPINION RESPONSE PARTY EVIDENCE LITIGATION WITHHOLD CONSENT POWER SYNDIA LMERF ALLEGEDLY UNLAWFUL LICENSING RIGHTS SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION REMAINDER PRIOR PLEADINGS GENUINE MATERIAL FACT MATTER NONMOVANT ANDERSON |
party plaintiff, and (b) state briefly the
(1) q Filed motion of [ use listing in "Motion" box above.]
(7-l q Brief in support of motion due ,-;.+L@?ilMfs~
-'
(3) 0 Answer brief to motion due __., Reply tq,:~~~_briefdue-.
(4) 0 Ruling/Hearing on - set for ~`t~".`!-wy`y
(5) 0 Status hearing[held/continued to] [set for/ws
(6) 0 Pretrial conference[held/continued to] [set for/re+Stfor] on __
(7) 0 Trial[set for/wset for] on -at-.
(8) 0 [Bench/July trial] [Hearing] heldkontinyed to
_i .
(9) 0 This case is dismissed [with/with&t] prejudice &%%hout
0 FRCP4(m) 0 General Rule 21 Cl FRC,
,,.:"
is;iraiikd, ,& case
(10) n [Other docket entry] Defendants' supple$
is dismissed in its entirety. All pending motions are moot.
No notices required.
Notices mailed by judge's staff.
Notified counsel by telephone.
Docketing 10 mail "OliCCS.
Mail A0 450 form.
99 C `8241
On February 14,2001, this court granted summary judgment to defendants Lemelson
& Research Foundation, L.P. ("LMERF"), 6 &`s on plaintiffs' claims relating to
licensing of plaintiffs Syndia Corporation, &. &. patent rights to Gillette and
court addressed and decided in favor of defendants regarding several issues which affect
defendants' alleged unlawful licensing to,other companies; as well. Defendants have now
motion for summary judgment as to the remainder of plaintiffs' claims on the basis of
Opinion. Plaintiffs responded to this motion largely by m-hashing arguments this court
SNIPPETS:
|
|
2
.
SUMMARY JUDGMENT ORDER
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS LEMELSON SYNDIA PATENTS LICENSE WARNER-LAMBERT GILLETTE COURT AGREEMENT RIGHTS HICKEY LMERF JEROME LEMELSON THIRD PARTIES SUMMARY JUDGMENT UNITED STATES LICENSING AGREEMENT EXCLUSIVE LICENSE MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT FIRST-AMENDED COMPLAINT THIRD-PARTY LICENSES INFRINGEMENT DOROTHY LEMELSON LITIGATION LETTER AGREEMENT GRANT LICENSES STAND-ALONE LICENSE PLAINTIFFS ARGUE SUB-LICENSE |
6 +Lo!-&i Fmt (O&9197,
6 United States District Court, Northern District of
-'
Name of&signed Judge
or James F. Holderman
Magistrate Judge
CASE NUMBER 99 C 8241
2/14/2001
CASE SYNDIA CORP et al vs. LEMELSON MEDICAL, EDUCATION,
TITLE
[In the following box (a) indicate the party
patty plaintiff, and (b) state briefly the
nature ofthe motion being presented.]
MOTION:
DOCKET ENTRY:
3) 0 Filed motion of [ use listing in "Motion" box above.]
7.1 0 Brief in support of motion due L
:3) 0 Answer brief to motion due L Reply to
:4) 0 Ruling/Hearing on -setfor at
:5) 0 Stams hearing[held/continued to] [set for/wset for] on -
:6) 0 Pretrial conference[held/continued to] [set for/w-set for] on
at
:7) q Trial[set forlre-set for] on at .
3) 0 [BencWJwy trial] [Hearing] held/continued to
3 0 This cake is dismissed [with/without] prejudice and without
0 FRCP4(m) 0 General Rule 21 0 FRCP4l(a)(l)
[lo) w [Other docket entry] Pursuant to Memorandum Opinion
motion for summary judgment as to Gillette and Warner-Lambert on Counts
amended complaint is denied. Defendants' cross-motion for summary
Warner-Lambert on Counts I through IV is granted. Defendants' motion
Count V is granted. Count V is dismissed in its entirety. Status
9:OOam.
111`) w lFor further detail see order attached to the oriainal minute
\ ,
4 Notices mailed by judge's staff.
Notified counsel by telephone.
Docketing to mail notices.
Mail A0 450 form.
Copy to judge/magistrate judge.
SNIPPETS:
|
|
3
.
COMPLAINT
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
LEMELSON SYNDIA HICKEY CONLEY LICENSING AGREEMENT PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS LICENSING PROGRAM BUSINESS ESTATE PATENT PORTFOLIO NEVADA PATENT PROSECUTION LICENSE SYNTHETIC DIAMOND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP TECHNOLOGY ENTREPRENEURS UNITED STATES OPTION AGREEMENT LETTER AGREEMENT MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT PARAGRAPHS LITIGATION PRINCIPALS OBLIGATIONS REPRESENTATIVES PROPERTY BUSINESS VENTURES |
IS THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT- .y
FOR THE NORTHERK DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
E.4STERS Dl\`lSION
SYXD1.4 CORPOR4TION~ an Illinois
C01pxati011,
ROGER P. HICKEY and JAMES G. COXLEY,
Plaintiffs,
1-s.
THE ESTATE OF JERO>lE H. LE\,IELSON,
LEMELSON MEDICAL, EDCCATION &
RESEARCH FOUNDATION, LIMITED
PARTh'ERSHIP, a Nevada Limited Pamcrship.
LEMELSOX EDUCATIONAL &
RESE,4RCH CORPORATION, a Yevada
Corporation, and DOES l- 10,
Defendants.
CO\IPI,.AIST
Plaintiffs Syndia Corporation. Roger P. Hikey and James G. Conley,
through their attonqs, Winston S: Strawn, complairl of Defendants The Estate of Jerome
Lemelson, Lemelson Medical Education `PL Reszarch Foundation, Limited Partnership, I.CnlCkOn
Educational & Research Corporation, and Does 1 -I 0 and state as hollows:
INTRODUCTION AND NATURE OF ACTION
1. This an action seeking illjunctiw relief and damayes for breach
and breach of contract. among other causes of action. Plaintiffs seek relief in this
diversity jtlrisdiction.
Edison's Lemelson vigorously and aggl-essi\~cly pwsued his patent riyhts against a
cornpanics. In the process. he obtained inkin~cmwt se;:lemcnts and licensing agreements
SNIPPETS:
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
