LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

STEVEN MCCLURE v JOHN D ASHCROFT Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: SMVJDA162173, Plaintiff: STEVEN MCCLURE, State: LA Louisiana, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>SMVJDA162173, CourtName: BEFORE THIS COURT COME THE ABOVE-NAMED PLAINTIFFS, ON THEIR OWN BEHALF AND ON BEHALF OF, Government, State Palace Theater, Rave, First Amendment, Pacifiers, Plea Agreement, Masks, United States, Orleans, Concert, Constitution, Electronic Music Events, Attendees, Glow, Smith, Confiscation, Cir, Behan, Performance Artists, Glowing Objects, Dance, Musical Concert, Rights, Injunctive Relief, Decl, Electronic Music Concerts, State Palace, Legal Items, Ban, Performers, Plaintiffs Steven Mcclure, Smith Decl, State Action, Requiring, Matter, Temporary Restraining, Declaration , ContentID: 120250227

Case Documents
1   MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 131115
43 pages
PDF
2   CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 124102
17 pages
PDF
3 2002-02-01 JUDGMENT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 131114
12 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 3 documents , 72 pages
Price: $ 29.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
PLAINTIFFS
GOVERNMENT
CIR
FIRST AMENDMENT
DANCE
PLEA AGREEMENT
RIGHTS
DECL
PACIFIERS
ELECTRONIC MUSIC CONCERTS
STATE PALACE
GLOW
BAN
STATE PALACE THEATER
ATTENDEES
UNITED STATES
SMITH DECL
CONSTITUTION
STATE ACTION
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING
ELECTRONIC MUSIC EVENTS
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
CONFISCATION
COORDINATED EFFORT
AUTHORITIES
INJUNCTIVE PROVISIONS
BOYD DECL
PERFORMERS
                                          UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                                  FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


STEVEN McCLURE, CLAYTON SMITH, and                                                ]    CASE DOCKET
MICHAEL BEHAN,                                                                    ]
                                                                                  ]    DIVISION:
                   Plaintiffs,                                                    ]
                                                                                  ]    SECTION:
             v.                                                                   ]
                                                                                  ]    JUDGE:
JOHN D. ASHCROFT, sued in his capacity as                                         ]
Attorney General of the United States,                                            ]
                                                                                  ]
                  Defendant.                                                      ]




                   PLAINTIFFS' MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES
                    IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING
                                    ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION


                                                      TABLE OF CONTENTS


Table of Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .


Table of Authorities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .


I.         INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .


II.        FACTUAL BACKGROUND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .


           A.         The Plea Agreement in United States v. Barbecue of New Orleans is the Result
                      Coordinated Effort to Eliminate Rave Culture. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .


           B.         Electronic Music Concerts Provide a Unique Venue for Expression. . . . . . .


III.       ARGUMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .


SNIPPETS:
  • PLAINTIFFS' MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES
  • IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING
  • Coordinated Effort to Eliminate Rave Culture
  • Confiscation
  • Rights Without Due Process of Law
  • American Civil Liberties Union v. Reno, 217 F.3d 162 (3rd Cir.

  • 2 . CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    PLAINTIFFS
    PACIFIERS
    MASKS
    ORLEANS
    ELECTRONIC MUSIC EVENTS
    GOVERNMENT
    SMITH
    CONCERT
    FIRST AMENDMENT
    CONSTITUTION
    BEHAN
    GLOW
    ATTENDEES
    UNITED STATES
    RAVE
    GLOWING OBJECTS
    CONFISCATION
    PLEA AGREEMENT
    PLAINTIFFS STEVEN MCCLURE
    PERFORMANCE ARTISTS
    MUSICAL CONCERT
    INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
    REQUIRING
    PERFORMERS
    VAPOR RUB PRODUCTS
    CLAYTON SMITH
    MICHAEL BEHAN
    DECLARATION
    FREE EXPRESSION
    
                                           UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                                  FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
    
    STEVEN McCLURE, CLAYTON SMITH, and                                                ] CASE DOCKET NO.
    MICHAEL BEHAN,                                                                    ]
                                                                                      ] DIVISION:
                       Plaintiffs,                                                    ]] SECTION:
                 v.                                                                   ]] JUDGE:
    JOHN D. ASHCROFT, sued in his capacity as                                         ]
    Attorney General of the United States,                                            ] CLASS ACTION
                                                                                      ] COMPLAINT
                      Defendant.                                                      ]
    
    
    
                       COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
    
                 Plaintiffs Steven McClure, Clayton Smith, and Michael Behan bring this class action on
    
    their own behalf and on behalf of a class of similarly situated performers and attendees of
    
    electronic music events at the State Palace Theater in New Orleans, Lousiana.  Plaintiffs, on
    
    information and belief, hereby allege:
    
                                                          I.  INTRODUCTION
    
                 1.  This action seeks a declaration that performance artists at a musical concert have
    
    right, protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, to be free of
    
                                                                         1
    
    
    
    governmental restrictions on their artistic use of legal items, including glowing objects and
    
    masks, during their public performances.  Further, this action seeks a declaration that attendees of
    
    a musical concert have the right, protected by the Fourth and Fifth Amendments to the United
    
    States Constitution, to be free of governmental measures requiring the seizure and confiscation of
    
    legally possessed items, including glowing objects, pacifiers, masks and massagers.  Finally,
    
    plaintiffs seek injunctive relief against the enforcement of the provisions of a plea agreement
    
    barring the use and possession at a musical concert of legally possessed items, including glowing
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
  • Plaintiffs Steven McClure, Clayton Smith, and Michael Behan bring this class action on
  • their own behalf and on behalf of a class of similarly situated performers and attendees of
  • electronic music events at the State Palace Theater in New Orleans,
  • This action seeks a declaration that performance artists at a musical concert have the
  • this action seeks a declaration that attendees of
  • a musical concert have the right, protected by the Fourth and Fifth Amendments to the United
  • States Constitution, to be free of governmental measures requiring the seizure and
  • legally possessed items, including glowing objects, pacifiers, masks and massagers.
  • The violation of plaintiffs' rights finds its source in a plea agreement entered into by
  • government's primary goals of eliminating many of the central elements of a rave.
  • None of these items are drug paraphernalia, as claimed by the government.
  • location to find glow sticks), a baby shower, a Mardi Gras parade
  • the government runs afoul of the First Amendment protection of free speech.
  • Attendees have suffered the seizure and confiscation of items like
  • will continue so long as defendant persists in requiring the State Palace Theater to prohibit
  • Plaintiff CLAYTON SMITH has been a member of the United States Air Force for the
  • routines using glow sticks for audiences of at least ten electronic music events at the State
  • pacifiers, objects that glow, masks, vapor rub products, massage tables and chill rooms from
  • Plaintiffs have a constitutional right to free expression through performance.

  • 3 . JUDGMENT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    COURT
    PLAINTIFFS
    PLEA AGREEMENT
    FIRST AMENDMENT
    UNITED STATES
    CONCERT
    ATTENDEES
    LEGAL ITEMS
    STATE PALACE THEATER
    CONSTITUTION
    MATTER
    PERFORMANCE ARTISTS
    SPEECH
    RAVES
    PROVISIONS
    DEFENDANT
    ENFORCEMENT
    INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
    CONFISCATION
    MUSICAL CONCERT
    SITUATED PLAINTIFFS
    SIMILARLY SITUATED PLAINTIFFS1
    ASHCROFT
    BANNED ITEMS
    VAPOR RUB
    PACIFIERS
    LEGALLY POSSESSED ITEMS
    DECLARATION
    DISTRICT
    
                                                UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                                              EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA.
    
    
    
    STEVEN MCCLURE, CLAYTON SMITH,                                                  CIVIL ACTION
    and MICHAEL BEHAN
    
    
    VERSUS
                                   NO.
                                                                                       01-2573
    
    
    JOHN D. ASHCROFT, sued in his capacity as
    Attorney General of the United States                                           SECTION "T" (5)
    
    
    
    Filed on February 1, 2002
    
    PORTEOUS, District J.
    
               Before this Court come the above-named Plaintiffs, on their own behalf and on behalf of
    
    all similarly situated plaintiffs1, who have requested: 1) a declaration that performance artists
    
    musical concert have the right, protected by the First Amendment to the United States
    
    Constitution, to be free of governmental restrictions on their artistic use of legal items during a
    
    public performance; 2) a declaration that attendees of a musical concert have the right, protected
    
    by the Fourth and Fifth Amendments to the United States Constitution, to be free of
    
    governmental measures requiring the seizure and confiscation of legally possessed items; 3)
    
    injunctive relief against the enforcement of the provisions of a plea agreement barring the use
    
    and possession at a musical concert of legally possessed items. The matter came for trial without
    
    a jury on December 17, 2001. The Court, having heard the testimony at trial and having
    
    considered the record, the evidence, the applicable law, and the memoranda submitted by the
    
    
                1 See Court Order of November 19, 2001, Granting Plaintiffs' Motion for Class
                Certification (Document No. 26).
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • musical concert have the right, protected by the First Amendment to the United States
  • Constitution, to be free of governmental restrictions on their artistic use of legal items
  • 2) a declaration that attendees of a musical concert have the right,
  • injunctive relief against the enforcement of the provisions of a plea agreement barring the
  • and possession at a musical concert of legally possessed items.
  • The Court, having heard the testimony at trial and having
  • See Court Order of November 19, 2001, Granting Plaintiffs' Motion for Class
  • the Drug Enforcement Agency began to
  • investigate alleged drug use at the State Palace Theater located at 1108 Canal Street in New
  • Theater during Raves, the United States Attorney brought charges against Barbeque of New
  • Inc. agreed to a plea agreement.
  • take all reasonable steps to prohibit the introduction of infant pacifiers or any
  • The named Plaintiffs are music, dance, and performance artists who use some
  • Amendment rights of free speech and expression were violated when the State Palace Theater,
  • by virtue of the plea agreement with the government, banned inherently legal items.
  • Injunction enjoining the Defendant, John D. Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States,
  • Vapor rub is smeared on masks to enhance the
  • The State Palace Theater did not have a set policy of how to deal with the banned items.
  • Both confiscation and allowing a return to a vehicle were methods used by the State
  • the defendant agrees that the subjects will take all reasonable steps to
  • memoranda both before and after the hearing on the law applicable to this matter.
  • by the government through a plea agreement with a criminal defendant, the third party
  • Littlefield v. Forney Independent School District,
  • The attendees of Raves go not just for the music,
  • finds that the actions of the named Plaintiffs and other similarly situated plaintiffs are
  •    |